Jump to content

Bad hints...

BAIN!

By BAIN!
in General geocaching topics

Followers 6

Recommended Posts

Huntleigh

+Huntleigh

Posted
Posted

What are the worst hints you've seen given for a cache... I'm sure this has been done before but why not again for any new bad hints.

 

"Gurer vf ab uvag" always gets me going.

nonaeroterraqueous

nonaeroterraqueous

Posted
Posted

Znr jrfg (Mae West)

 

The cache was so obvious that every hiker who came by probably looked through it, so we didn't need the clue. It was on the East side of the trail, too. I have no idea how the clue related to the cache, and I'm quite familiar with Mae West, the actress.

Bon Echo

Bon Echo

Posted
Posted

How about this one:

 

Hints are for cheaters.... where would you hide it ? Likely where I hid it.

 

Well I looked in the places where I would hide it and didn't find anything. So it must be gone then?

SwineFlew

+SwineFlew

Posted
Posted

I see some bad hints that cause more damages than necessary. I saw a few liar hints out there and I will say this, it does do damage because people will attack what the hint is point at and keep right on searching.

 

I see some hints out there that doesnt make any senses at all until you find the cache itself. I dont find those very helpful.

 

A good hint is a hint that narrow the search down a bit.

Great Scott!

+Great Scott!

Posted
Posted

"BAWREE OF BGTILHRY CLOROED, SLIK FWOLRES!" ... unencrypted.

"ONJERR BS OTGVYUEL PYBEBRQ, FYVX SJBYERF!" ... encrypted.

 

Cheers,

PandA Inc

 

that was a double encrypted hint:

 

beware of brightly colored silk flowers

Panda Inc

+Panda Inc

Posted
Posted

"BAWREE OF BGTILHRY CLOROED, SLIK FWOLRES!" ... unencrypted.

"ONJERR BS OTGVYUEL PYBEBRQ, FYVX SJBYERF!" ... encrypted.

 

Cheers,

PandA Inc

I bet I know who's hint that is.

Whatever do you mean?! :rolleyes:

 

Hope all is well in the NW!!

 

Cheers,

PandA

Don_J

+Don_J

Posted
Posted

Do not click decrypt . . . Lbh'er na vqvbg

 

Maybe the locals thought that it was funny. I was visiting and thought that it was a bit immature.

Don_J

+Don_J

Posted
Posted

Bad hint: "Just like all the others that I hid today". The CO never considered that you could hike the trail from two different trail heads, so his last cache hid was the first one I was seeking.

 

"As you go down the trail, it's on your right". Same thing. As I go down the trail in which direction?

 

"Chin high". Who's chin?

 

"Where a dog would pee". It was!

niraD

+niraD

Posted
Posted

How about "ankle high" for a cache that lowered through an overhead opening? It was indeed at ankle height (given the length of the cable used to lower it), but you needed to search overhead to find it.

OZ2CPU

+OZ2CPU

Posted
Posted (edited)

French only hints drives me nuts, and even worse i see a spoiler picture, but Can offcourse not get data connection..

Edited by OZ2CPU
uxorious

+uxorious

Posted
Posted (edited)

Not many people have to decode the hint, in the rain, with a pencil these days. However, it does happen. I really wish everyone who encodes a stupid hint,(or non hint) will someday find themselves having to do so.

 

Non hints, and hints that cannot be used at GZ, are as rude as someone who would pass gas in a crowded elevator.

 

Edited to add that you don't need to leave anything in the hint. If you do not want people to have a hint, that is just fine, BUT LEAVE THAT PART BLANK THEN. :mad:<_<

Edited by uxorious
GeoTrekker26

+GeoTrekker26

Posted
Posted

One of the best hints, which some may consider one of the worst, is on an open campus. The hint is "under the tree." After some unproductive searching around the many exposed roots, while many muggles wandered by, I resorted to reading old logs. I finally figured out that I needed to go about 100 feet away from GZ, enter a building through a secondary door, go down the stairs, then follow the basement passage around a couple of bends until I was under the tree. Public access is allowed so it is a valid and fun hide.

Gitchee-Gummee

+Gitchee-Gummee

Posted
Posted

One of the best hints, which some may consider one of the worst, is on an open campus. The hint is "under the tree." After some unproductive searching around the many exposed roots, while many muggles wandered by, I resorted to reading old logs. I finally figured out that I needed to go about 100 feet away from GZ, enter a building through a secondary door, go down the stairs, then follow the basement passage around a couple of bends until I was under the tree. Public access is allowed so it is a valid and fun hide.

We sort of enjoy "cryptic" hints also. You know, some that just may have multiple meanings.

 

Far better than "none", "none needed", "not today" or like carp.

dprovan

+dprovan

Posted
Posted

Bad hint: "Just like all the others that I hid today". The CO never considered that you could hike the trail from two different trail heads, so his last cache hid was the first one I was seeking.

Yeah, and worse is "My standard hide" when it's the first cache I've ever looked for by this CO -- or the tenth, but I haven't recognized any standard -- and even worse is "JoeCool's standard hide" when I wouldn't know JoeCool from Adam. In general, hints that depend on local knowledge.

 

The ones I really hate are things like "Don't be stumped," which can mean either that it is in the stump or that it isn't in the stump.

ArtieD

+ArtieD

Posted
Posted (edited)

Okay...this person's hints aren't bad per se...many of them are quite good. The thing that is annoying to me is the way they are written. Here's a standard one, decrypted:

 

Edutignol dna edutital yletinifed tsom llits tub) tamrof dradnats eht ni eb ton lliw elzzup eht ni deniatbo setanidrooc eht.

 

Granted, most would see this one while solving a puzzle, but this format is used even when the hint deals with something you'd need in the field. If I were decrypting it by hand, I would be just a bit frustrated...

Edited by Arthur & Trillian
313JTG

+313JTG

Posted
Posted

How about caches with no hints and hundreds of potential hiding places at GZ?

 

I was at one like this about a week or two ago. It was a micro in a wooded area with fences and signs all around. No idea what the container was and didn't know if it was up high, down low, wired to a tree, under a fence cap, or on the ground.

 

To me, not putting a hint on a cache is worse than a lame hint :anitongue:

Gitchee-Gummee

+Gitchee-Gummee

Posted
Posted

I think the most problematic for me would be jargon which is difficult to translate from English into my language.

...or even American English vs Brit English. Sometimes is even difficult in the States, having "local" jargon and the like.

StarBrand

+StarBrand

Posted
Posted

One cacher I know in a nearby state never ever ever leaves any hints of any kind on any of his hides. Almost all are difficulty 2 to 3.5 and his coordinates are typical 20 to 30 feet off (poor equipment). That is frustrating to me.

SoonerCardsFan

+SoonerCardsFan

Posted
Posted

There was a local cache that had the clue "magnetic". It was out in the woods. The cache was a bison tube hidden in a piece of wood that had been cut in half, hollowed out and then held back together with magnets. Great hide, lousy clue.

 

A new cacher in the area puts "teehee" as a clue.

NYPaddleCacher

+NYPaddleCacher

Posted
Posted

One of the best hints, which some may consider one of the worst, is on an open campus. The hint is "under the tree." After some unproductive searching around the many exposed roots, while many muggles wandered by, I resorted to reading old logs. I finally figured out that I needed to go about 100 feet away from GZ, enter a building through a secondary door, go down the stairs, then follow the basement passage around a couple of bends until I was under the tree. Public access is allowed so it is a valid and fun hide.

 

One of the best hints I've seen was "think laterally". Without the hint there were lots of places where the cache could have been hidden but if one applied a little lateral thinking when reading the cache description it narrowed things down considerably.

Off Grid

+Off Grid

Posted
Posted

Bad hints

 

Keep looking its there

 

Look in the rocks when there's a hundred of them

 

Stump when there's about 27 of them I counted

 

Look in a tree well I'm in the forest what type of tree...

ByronForestPreserve

+ByronForestPreserve

Posted
Posted

In a pile of rocks: "Good luck!"

 

I find it annoying when someone puts superfluous info in the description as part of the cache info..."This dock was built in 1847 and blah blah dock blah blah just look at this dock" and the cache is 100' from the darn dock.

cerberus1

+cerberus1

Posted
Posted

I have a hide with what some call a lousey hint:

"You're kidding right? Okay if you're not kidding , look at the cache name again"

The name of the cache is "Black Rock".

It's a two foot wide flat rock I spray-painted black and pack-frame lugged the mile or so out to place.

It's covering a hole in an old field rock wall - and the only black rock there.

Panda Inc

+Panda Inc

Posted
Posted

"In a crack in a rock" ... when your looking for cracks in rocks, all you see are cracks in rocks and an occasional rock in a crack. That one was a DNF.

 

Then there's "It's not where you think" ... is that really a hint? So no matter what I think, it's wrong? I think I gave up on that one too, or maybe I'm wrong.

 

Cheers,

PandA Inc

ras_oscar

+ras_oscar

Posted
Posted

I had a chat with a cacher friend several years ago. He relayed the story of a cache that was in front of a bar near a british style pay phone. The hint said "for a hint dial XXX XX XXXX" after searching all throught the area, including on,in,and under the pay phone he dropped a quarter and punched in the phone number. A drawer popped open and revealed the cache.

sozzer1

+sozzer1

Posted
Posted

I am no horticulturist so hate it when people describe plants or the type of tree where you should look for the cache. We might not be able to recognise plant species and then at different times of the year the plant could well be either dead or leafless and so unrecognisable. Very frustrating :blink:

Off Grid

+Off Grid

Posted
Posted

I am no horticulturist so hate it when people describe plants or the type of tree where you should look for the cache. We might not be able to recognise plant species and then at different times of the year the plant could well be either dead or leafless and so unrecognisable. Very frustrating :blink:

NeverSummer

+NeverSummer

Posted
Posted

I am no horticulturist so hate it when people describe plants or the type of tree where you should look for the cache. We might not be able to recognise plant species and then at different times of the year the plant could well be either dead or leafless and so unrecognisable. Very frustrating :blink:

I would hope that most folks can identify the difference between coniferous and deciduous trees. From there, I would think it isn't too tough to know the difference between a birch, oak, fruit, cedar or spruce/pine/fir tree.

 

But that's just me... B)

niraD

+niraD

Posted
Posted
I would hope that most folks can identify the difference between coniferous and deciduous trees. From there, I would think it isn't too tough to know the difference between a birch, oak, fruit, cedar or spruce/pine/fir tree.
Yeah, but without the internet, I couldn't identify a Picea glauca or a Betula lenta if my life depended on it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
Followers 6
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...