+jpamusher Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 I was reviewing the geocache requirements prior to placing a new cache and came across this: "Geocaches are allowed in space, other planets and spacecraft." This is actually published in the official guidelines! I was just wondering why this is included as 1 the only way to place a geocache on say Mars would be via an unmanned probe and thus nobody could get there to find it 2 there are no gps satellites in orbit around Mars,so a gps wouldn`t work there anyway! Quote Link to comment
+Isonzo Karst Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 1) for the fun of it 2) because there is a cache on the International Space Station....really ;-) 1 Quote Link to comment
+jpamusher Posted February 27, 2011 Author Share Posted February 27, 2011 1) for the fun of it 2) because there is a cache on the International Space Station....really ;-) Quote Link to comment
+jpamusher Posted February 27, 2011 Author Share Posted February 27, 2011 That is really interesting,Isonzo Karst! I just wonder if a gps would work in orbit since the gps satellites pinpoint a location on the surface of the earth. I am going to try and look it up! Quote Link to comment
+DanOCan Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) quote name='jpamusher' timestamp='1298819853' post='4632192']I was just wondering why this is included as 1 the only way to place a geocache on say Mars would be via an unmanned probe and thus nobody could get there to find it 2 there are no gps satellites in orbit around Mars,so a gps wouldn`t work there anyway! The only way to place a geocache on say Mars today would be via an unmanned probe and thus nobody could get there to find it without a lot of effort and money. There are no gps satellites in orbit around Mars right now,so a gps wouldn`t work there yet. Nothing quite like future-proofing the guidelines. Seriously though, I think Post #2 pretty much hit it right on the money. Edited February 27, 2011 by DanOCan Quote Link to comment
+Walts Hunting Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 That is really interesting,Isonzo Karst! I just wonder if a gps would work in orbit since the gps satellites pinpoint a location on the surface of the earth. I am going to try and look it up! There's no reason it wouldn't. Each satellites signal is a sphere. Two spheres (satellites) intersect to create a circle. Add a third sphere to intersect with the circle and you have two points. One more and it is down to a single point in space. Our GPS's give us a location (inaccurately) with just three satellites by making an assumption that we are on the planet. The other point is in space somewhere. Quote Link to comment
+The Blorenges Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 You might like to read the Latitude 47 Blog - TB with 350 million miles to return to Earth. MrsB Quote Link to comment
+LukeTrocity Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though. Quote Link to comment
+narcissa Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 Platinum members get special rates on space flights. Quote Link to comment
4wheelin_fool Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) That is really interesting,Isonzo Karst! I just wonder if a gps would work in orbit since the gps satellites pinpoint a location on the surface of the earth. I am going to try and look it up! There's no reason it wouldn't. Each satellites signal is a sphere. Two spheres (satellites) intersect to create a circle. Add a third sphere to intersect with the circle and you have two points. One more and it is down to a single point in space. Our GPS's give us a location (inaccurately) with just three satellites by making an assumption that we are on the planet. The other point is in space somewhere. The satellites are too close to the earth in comparison to the distance of other planets. A typical commercial GPS receiver would show all of the satellites on top of each other. However, a modified military or scientific GPS unit with a "Kipkay" hack would be able to identify the specific planet once you were in space. After that, you would need to use the hint to locate it and a LOT of searching. Or you could find out the precise time that it was hidden and calculate the distance from the planet that the lightwaves have traveled, and see if there has been any images captured from the planet during the time frame that would show where it was being hidden, and then zoom in really close. If it was on Mars, the light would take about 4 minutes to arrive here, but on Uranus it would take about 2 and a half hours and from Neptune it would be over 4 hours. There is also the possibility of having the first stage on this planet with instructions on how to get to the second stage. Edited February 27, 2011 by 4wheelin_fool Quote Link to comment
+Sol seaker Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 That is really interesting,Isonzo Karst! I just wonder if a gps would work in orbit since the gps satellites pinpoint a location on the surface of the earth. I am going to try and look it up! There's no reason it wouldn't. Each satellites signal is a sphere. Two spheres (satellites) intersect to create a circle. Add a third sphere to intersect with the circle and you have two points. One more and it is down to a single point in space. Our GPS's give us a location (inaccurately) with just three satellites by making an assumption that we are on the planet. The other point is in space somewhere. But remember the other element to the GPS is that we have a grid on the planet saying where those points relate to on the earth. The satellites will know where we are, but there is no GPS grid in space (correct me if I'm wrong) so we wouldn't be able to put a reference to where the satellite was telling us we were. http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=611d0635-a1cf-41bc-a0cc-a6038ae288d5 There's a link to the space station cache. Please don't post notes on it. They've had a lot of trouble with people posting notes and cluttering up the pages. Also then everyone who has a watch on it writes in and complains because they're getting a ton of email, which in turn creates more mess. They've had to lock it periodically because of this. Post comments on these forums if you've got them, not the cache pages in this case. Quote Link to comment
GOF and Bacall Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 So, are the Marscache rules gonna be anything like the Earthcache rules? Oh, sorry, "guidelines". Quote Link to comment
user13371 Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 (edited) I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though.I'd save that one for a night-cache run. Too hot during the day. Edited February 27, 2011 by Portland Cyclist 1 Quote Link to comment
+Chrysalides Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 That is really interesting,Isonzo Karst! I just wonder if a gps would work in orbit since the gps satellites pinpoint a location on the surface of the earth. I am going to try and look it up! There's no reason it wouldn't. Each satellites signal is a sphere. Two spheres (satellites) intersect to create a circle. Add a third sphere to intersect with the circle and you have two points. One more and it is down to a single point in space. Our GPS's give us a location (inaccurately) with just three satellites by making an assumption that we are on the planet. The other point is in space somewhere. But remember the other element to the GPS is that we have a grid on the planet saying where those points relate to on the earth. The satellites will know where we are, but there is no GPS grid in space (correct me if I'm wrong) so we wouldn't be able to put a reference to where the satellite was telling us we were. I don't have personal experience with this - if anyone has $30 million to spare I'll be willing to check it out in person. But seeing that the ISS orbits at about 350 km above sea level, significantly below the GPS satellites (20,000 km), I believe that it is possible to get a reading with the right receiver. Civilian GPS receivers are artificially limited to not work above a certain elevation and velocity, to prevent it from being used in weapons. Link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Restrictions_on_civilian_use As for the grid, imagine the grid lines, projected out into space, with origin being the center of the Earth. Quote Link to comment
+Too Tall John Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 The satellites will know where we are...No, no they don't. Your receiver knows where it is in relation to the satellites, but only the Tinfoil Cap Club thinks the satellites know where you are. Quote Link to comment
4wheelin_fool Posted February 27, 2011 Share Posted February 27, 2011 I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though.I'd save that one for a night-cache run. Too hot during the day. So now that the final location is given away, I suppose that the firetacks on Mercury and Venus are unnecessary. Quote Link to comment
+lamoracke Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 I hope the first geocache on Mars is not a lamp post hide. Quote Link to comment
+CachinStrattons Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 I hope the first geocache on Mars is not a lamp post hide. Wrong. I, Personally, built the lamp post. I didn't want it to be dark for the FTF, after all! Quote Link to comment
+power69 Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 1) for the fun of it 2) because there is a cache on the International Space Station....really ;-) and for a mere twenty million dollars you can log it[if you can find it] Quote Link to comment
+Chrysalides Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 I hope the first geocache on Mars is not a lamp post hide. No, it'll just be like all those lunar hides. Under a suspicious pile of rocks. Quote Link to comment
+Gorak Posted February 28, 2011 Share Posted February 28, 2011 Very interesting... I would cross post my Martian and Venusian caches but your Terran coordinate system is not compatible with the galactic standards that are used throughout this, and neighbouring, galaxies. See my profile for more details... There is no dark side of the moon. It's all dark... Quote Link to comment
+Cryptosporidium-623 Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 (edited) Very interesting... I would cross post my Martian and Venusian caches but your Terran coordinate system is not compatible with the galactic standards that are used throughout this, and neighbouring, galaxies. See my profile for more details... There is no dark side of the moon. It's all dark... High-Four Gorak! Extraterrestrial caches rule! Silly Hoomans. Edited March 1, 2011 by daschpeeg Quote Link to comment
+Chief301 Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though. Whaddaya use for a container? You think keeping water out of a cache is tough.... Quote Link to comment
+power69 Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 I hope the first geocache on Mars is not a lamp post hide. No, it'll just be like all those lunar hides. Under a suspicious pile of rocks. rocks? nah! nothing but cheese on the moon! have fun finding that blinkie in one of those cheese holes. Quote Link to comment
+power69 Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though. Whaddaya use for a container? You think keeping water out of a cache is tough.... "couldn't sign log, it was wet" Quote Link to comment
+Mark+Karen Posted March 1, 2011 Share Posted March 1, 2011 The satellites will know where we are...No, no they don't. Your receiver knows where it is in relation to the satellites, but only the Tinfoil Cap Club thinks the satellites know where you are. One of the most misunderstood aspects of GPS. I remember trying to convince my Dad that the receiver didn't "send a signal to the satellite" and that the satellites won't become overloaded because too many people are trying to use GPS at the same time! Quote Link to comment
Steinninn Posted June 21, 2011 Share Posted June 21, 2011 Does anyone have a link the the ISS spacestation cache? Quote Link to comment
+grateful cacher Posted June 22, 2011 Share Posted June 22, 2011 But the guidelines also say you must be able to place and retrieve the cache......as well as do maintenance to it.... I was reviewing the geocache requirements prior to placing a new cache and came across this: "Geocaches are allowed in space, other planets and spacecraft." This is actually published in the official guidelines! I was just wondering why this is included as 1 the only way to place a geocache on say Mars would be via an unmanned probe and thus nobody could get there to find it 2 there are no gps satellites in orbit around Mars,so a gps wouldn`t work there anyway! Quote Link to comment
EinkeY Posted November 17, 2012 Share Posted November 17, 2012 Its doesn't seem right that a Geocache should be allowed to be placed on spacecraft or other planets, because its a Geocache! geo means earth right?? Quote Link to comment
+Beach_hut Posted November 17, 2012 Share Posted November 17, 2012 Knowing my luck, if I got to Mars and placed a cache there, I'd send it for submission and it'd come back it's within 0.1 miles of the final of a puzzle cache... Quote Link to comment
+Beach_hut Posted November 17, 2012 Share Posted November 17, 2012 Its doesn't seem right that a Geocache should be allowed to be placed on spacecraft or other planets, because its a Geocache! geo means earth right?? As a prefix: geo- is taken from the Greek word γη or γαια meaning "earth", usually in the sense of "ground or land". Open to interpretation... Quote Link to comment
+ow3n and friends Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Is their a cache on Mars? I know there is one on the ISS but what about the red planet? Quote Link to comment
+UMainah Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Is their a cache on Mars? I know there is one on the ISS but what about the red planet? Unless the Curiosity rover placed one recently and it just hasn't been published yet, then no, there is not a cache on Mars. Quote Link to comment
+Maconb Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 I put a cache on the sun. Have fun retrieving it though. FTF!!!!!! Log was burnt needs maintenance. TFTC!!! Quote Link to comment
knowschad Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Its doesn't seem right that a Geocache should be allowed to be placed on spacecraft or other planets, because its a Geocache! geo means earth right?? You'd better hurry up and register lunacache.com! Quote Link to comment
+geodarts Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 (edited) Is their a cache on Mars? I know there is one on the ISS but what about the red planet? Unless the Curiosity rover placed one recently and it just hasn't been published yet, then no, there is not a cache on Mars. I first suspected that the plastic beads found by Curiousity was a clever cache camo. But later I learned that Martian authorities do not permit physical caching on the planet because it would interfere with the black ops antigrav martian mining program. I heard that Aura Raines wanted to submit a cache on Mars, but it was a virtual of the Face (or was it the Monolith or Sneaker?) and could not be published on this site. She was going to make it a challenge, but . . . Edited December 5, 2012 by geodarts Quote Link to comment
+dprovan Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 Since you don't use a GPSr to navigate to the ISS cache, and there's no log, it's really just a very large travelbug. But if they put a stamp there, I think that would make it a legal letterbox hybrid. "At the posted coordinates, get on a spaceship..." Quote Link to comment
Andronicus Posted December 5, 2012 Share Posted December 5, 2012 I don't have personal experience with this - if anyone has $30 million to spare I'll be willing to check it out in person. But seeing that the ISS orbits at about 350 km above sea level, significantly below the GPS satellites (20,000 km), I believe that it is possible to get a reading with the right receiver. Civilian GPS receivers are artificially limited to not work above a certain elevation and velocity, to prevent it from being used in weapons. Link : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Positioning_System#Restrictions_on_civilian_use As for the grid, imagine the grid lines, projected out into space, with origin being the center of the Earth. Most GPS receivers have a maximum speed at wich they will operate. I suspect it is related to their calculation speed. The orbital speed of the ISS is way too high for any GPSr that we geocaches have, and maby for any GPSr. Also, the calculation engine within most GPSr assume the GPSr is within a few thousand meters of sea level. At 350 000 meters, the calculations would not work. Interesting information about the orbatal distances. I thougth GPS satellites were in low earth orbit, and the ISS would be outside of the contalation. I guess if the ISS could hold still for a few minutes, you could get a GPS lock. Of course that would result in free fall back to earth, with would induce its own speed issues. Quote Link to comment
+dprovan Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Most GPS receivers have a maximum speed at wich they will operate. I suspect it is related to their calculation speed. The orbital speed of the ISS is way too high for any GPSr that we geocaches have, and maby for any GPSr. Also, the calculation engine within most GPSr assume the GPSr is within a few thousand meters of sea level. At 350 000 meters, the calculations would not work. Interesting information about the orbatal distances. I thougth GPS satellites were in low earth orbit, and the ISS would be outside of the contalation. I guess if the ISS could hold still for a few minutes, you could get a GPS lock. Of course that would result in free fall back to earth, with would induce its own speed issues. The real problem isn't whether you can find your location when you're in the ISS. The problem is picking the coordinates to post in the description. Quote Link to comment
+Chrysalides Posted February 23, 2013 Share Posted February 23, 2013 The real problem isn't whether you can find your location when you're in the ISS. The problem is picking the coordinates to post in the description. I thought Groundspeak's (or was it Richard Garriott's) decision to use the coordinates for Baikonur Cosmodrome is a logical one since NASA does not give rides to paying customers (and of course now does not have the capability after retiring the shuttle fleet). It was amusing to note that they did screw up the longitude initially and it was listed in Nova Scotia. Of course, if Groundspeak wants to really get fancy about it, they can update the coordinates in near real time. One can argue that it should have been listed as a multistage instead of a traditional, but considering that it is unique, I think the whole argument is pointless. Quote Link to comment
+JKMonkey Posted February 24, 2013 Share Posted February 24, 2013 Honestly if I ever became an astronaut, I would be sure to place some sort of cache on whatever I visited before leaving. Quote Link to comment
+youkfish Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Is their a cache on Mars? I know there is one on the ISS but what about the red planet? I've had to go for a hike on Mars, check it out! Very fun and low cost: http://coord.info/GC1N4C3 Quote Link to comment
+JKMonkey Posted March 3, 2013 Share Posted March 3, 2013 Imagine if NASA dropped a cache on Mars when they visit, how awesome would that be!? Quote Link to comment
CheeseCakeCacher Posted April 8, 2013 Share Posted April 8, 2013 Actually in 2023 humans will be on Mars. Look up Mars One Quote Link to comment
+geofern Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 There is a cache on Saturn...... Check GC2QV55 18 finds.... Quote Link to comment
+Fridge01 Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 a couple observations for the mathematically inclined. 1. Planets moves relative to the placement of GPS satellites.So would'nt we have moving caches with no stable GPS coordinates? unless published in an different matrix. 2. GPS mesurements for geocaches are 2-dimensional with no coordinate for altitude. If another planet is at a particular spot in it's orbit, the cache could violate the saturation rule by being within 528 feet of a cache on Earth when measured in 2 dimensions. Quote Link to comment
GCEdo Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 Both Mars and Moon have their own coordinate systems similar to Earth one. So, we "only" need gps satellites around those planets and we can play our game there same as here on Earth. Quote Link to comment
+Ben0w Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 2. GPS mesurements for geocaches are 2-dimensional with no coordinate for altitude. If another planet is at a particular spot in it's orbit, the cache could violate the saturation rule by being within 528 feet of a cache on Earth when measured in 2 dimensions. You could get it published, if you give your reviewer evidence, that there is no direct path between them and so they are not likely to be confused with each other. Quote Link to comment
Carter43 Posted December 11, 2018 Share Posted December 11, 2018 On 12/5/2012 at 11:13 AM, Maconb said: FTF!!!!!! Log was burnt needs maintenance. TFTC!!! Hey I came in five minutes later and guess what you left the FTF geocoin Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.