Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3
Cacheism 500

Challenge cache ideas that seem good but don't get past the reviewer

Recommended Posts

On 11/25/2020 at 2:09 AM, Isonzo Karst said:

 

I'd be curious as to what the reviewer told  you about, "why it was not allowed". "Knocked back 6 times", means that there was a fair amount of back and forth.

If there are 2 similar within 5km of your house, then that's reason enough. But I'm guessing that's not it.

 

 

One of the reasons was that it was stacked towards the finders in the eastern states as there are more counties in the east than the west so it made it unfair.

Share this post


Link to post
On 11/25/2020 at 5:04 AM, Lynx Humble said:

Well GC702W4 requires 95 counties. Too similar in my opinion.

 

 

Mine was for NSW not in the ACT like the others. Also the proposed cache was more than 130km from GC702W4

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 3

×
×
  • Create New...