+Sol seaker Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I just submitted a cache for review last night. Right after I submitted it I posted a note for a coin drop. That was at 7:15. At 7:38 I got a note that my cache was published. Not much more than 15 minutes!!! (YOU GO ROCK RABBIT!!! YOU ROCK!!!) My geopartner submitted one recently and was fretting about it. He kept checking back again and again to see if it had been published. I told him sometimes these things take time and to be patient. Some may take up to two days I hear. He said, "OK I've waited long enough!" And just then my phone beeped. New cache. His. One hour publish time. Big thanks to all these hard working reviewers!!! The unsung heros of geocaching!!!! Quote Link to comment
+Arrow42 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 My first cache took 30+ hours. My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. Quote Link to comment
+Col. Flagg Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. Did some FTF finders think that you were first to the cache when in reality you were just placing it? Quote Link to comment
+WRASTRO Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 If I remember correctly I had a cache published within a couple of minutes. Timing is everything! Quote Link to comment
+WRITE SHOP ROBERT Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 My first cache took 30+ hours. My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. Haha, but you checked the box that said it was ready to go...There's no telling how fast a Cache might be approved. I guess the quickest ever might be only one or two minutes. Quote Link to comment
+Team Cotati Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I had one published in about 4 minutes one time. To my knowledge that still stands as the world record. Quote Link to comment
+Okiebryan Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I've had them published while I was still editing the HTML on the cache page. Quote Link to comment
+Team Cotati Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 That world record didn't last very long. Quote Link to comment
+Okiebryan Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 That world record didn't last very long. Sorry, man. What can I say? We have a great reviewer. Quote Link to comment
GOF and Bacall Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 While obviously not as fast as they get published in OK I had one that I submitted and by the time I shelled my next peanut I had the published notice. Quote Link to comment
+Team Cotati Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 That world record didn't last very long. Sorry, man. What can I say? We have a great reviewer. The world's best. Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Fastest of mine was a shade under 4 minutes. Caught him at his desk I guess. Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 (edited) My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. ???????????? .... Edited November 2, 2009 by keehotee Quote Link to comment
+Arrow42 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. ???????????? .... I had checked the coords the night before and then again that morning but I didn't have the container compleatly ready yet. I brought it to work with me, thinking I could finish the cache page, and then have time to go drop the cache off at lunch. My first cache took a while and I had just read some posts on the forum whining about 70+ hour waits so I thought there was no rush. I won't make that mistake again. I immediately disabled the cache, made a note to the reviewer and headed out to the site to drop off the container. Only took 15 min to hide the container... by the time I got back the cache had already been retracted (5 min or so) with a scolding note about having the cache ready. heh... I re-activated the cache and it was published within 30 min AGAIN! That's what I call speedy service and a learning experience. Quote Link to comment
bradly22 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 So far I've only hidden 2 caches. The first one took about 18 hours, however the second one took 9 days! Quote Link to comment
+Harry Dolphin Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 My second cache took around 10-15 min. It caught me off guard - the cache was still sitting in my car. ???????????? .... I had checked the coords the night before and then again that morning but I didn't have the container compleatly ready yet. I brought it to work with me, thinking I could finish the cache page, and then have time to go drop the cache off at lunch. My first cache took a while and I had just read some posts on the forum whining about 70+ hour waits so I thought there was no rush. That's what I call speedy service and a learning experience. Yeah. I learned that lesson. Around here, it used to be that caches got published on Thusdays. I never unchecked the 'cache is ready box.' I was helping my sister, in another state, with her cache page, when she got an e-mail from the reviewer that the coords were in the middle of the ocean! My fastest publication was last week at 45 minutes. Quote Link to comment
+NYPaddleCacher Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 It seems to me that the fastest way a cache could get published is if the reviewer knew exactly when it was going to be submitted. That would occur if a reviewer had placed a cache, submitted it for review, the reviewed their own cache. While reviewers might not use the same handle for geocaching as they do for geocaching I would find it hard to believe that many of them did not spend a fair amount of times as geocachers as well, and have hidden (and reviewed) their own caches. Quote Link to comment
+Skyjuggler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Our local reviewer in South Africa is awesome. Averaging about 20minutes to publish. But the most amazing thing is, it doesn't seem to matter WHEN you submit it. 02:00am, by 02:20am it's out. Always super helpful too. Big thanks to ALL the reviewers out there... Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 It seems to me that the fastest way a cache could get published is if the reviewer knew exactly when it was going to be submitted. That would occur if a reviewer had placed a cache, submitted it for review, the reviewed their own cache. While reviewers might not use the same handle for geocaching as they do for geocaching I would find it hard to believe that many of them did not spend a fair amount of times as geocachers as well, and have hidden (and reviewed) their own caches. For me, this would only be true if there were no other similar caches awaiting review. If there were fifteen traditional caches submitted in my territory earlier in the day, I would review those caches first before publishing one that I had hidden. Quote Link to comment
+Wooden Cyclist Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 How about the fastest from the hide to the FTF? I hid my first cache. Drove home and submitted it. The reviewer published it. The FTF was logged by someone who happened to be in the area. Total time 45 minutes. Quote Link to comment
+palmetto Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 it doesn't seem to matter WHEN you submit it. 02:00am, by 02:20am it's out. You think he enjoys the thought of phones ringing at 2am.... ? As a reviewer I'm not real concerned about the speed of publication of my own caches. Indeed, it's really more fun to put my cache out for some other reviewer to publish - they might offer harassment helpful remarks, add weird pics of dancing hamsters, or Alaskan wolves proofread my spelling, generally mess with my cache, generally do their helpful best to get that listing out right and proper. Keystone himself was once kind enough to suggest, that while my cache wasn't quite suitable for Geocaching.com, I could certainly try an alternate listing service, I believe it was www.yourcachesucks.com Quote Link to comment
+TheAlabamaRambler Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I've had 48 listings published. 3 which were submitted in the normal manner were published in less than 5 minutes; the fastest were published immediately... maybe a minute for me to log out of my account and he into his, since I was sitting under a tree in a campground with the Reviewer and listed them on his laptop! The longest was around 12 hours. 3 have been held up needing corrections. 30 minutes publication-to-FTF for urban caches is not uncommon in my area... few last 4 hours. Rural caches 40 miles from the city rarely last a full day. Quote Link to comment
+jhauser42 Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 How about the fastest from the hide to the FTF? I hid my first cache. Drove home and submitted it. The reviewer published it. The FTF was logged by someone who happened to be in the area. Total time 45 minutes. My latest hide was published about 4pm local time Friday afternoon. It was found about 10 minutes later.... Quote Link to comment
Sandy Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 It is great to have this positive feedback about our Reviewers. As you know, they are a team of dedicated volunteers, and we are forever grateful for their efforts. Quote Link to comment
+DarkZen Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 I've had on published in about two minutes (maybe less). I went back in to edit it after I submitted it and found it published already! I once had a cache published and found in 28 minutes from the time of enabling. Quote Link to comment
+iwikepie Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I entered one at 8:11 one night and it was published at 8:13. Two -maybe one and a half minutes. Quote Link to comment
+TheAlabamaRambler Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 It is great to have this positive feedback about our Reviewers. As you know, they are a team of dedicated volunteers, and we are forever grateful for their efforts. Must be a new sock puppet for Mtn-Man. Quote Link to comment
GOF and Bacall Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I was of the understanding that everyone on these forums not myself are either Mountain Man or Flask. Obviously they have a LOT of socks. Perhaps that is what happens to those socks when the drier get 'em. Quote Link to comment
+Sol seaker Posted November 3, 2009 Author Share Posted November 3, 2009 Keystone himself was once kind enough to suggest, that while my cache wasn't quite suitable for Geocaching.com, I could certainly try an alternate listing service, I believe it was www.yourcachesucks.com This was great!!! Made me really laugh. This is why I read the forums. thanks! (ps, glad to have the URL for future reference in case I need it) Quote Link to comment
+Wooden Cyclist Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 How about the fastest from the hide to the FTF? I hid my first cache. Drove home and submitted it. The reviewer published it. The FTF was logged by someone who happened to be in the area. Total time 45 minutes. My latest hide was published about 4pm local time Friday afternoon. It was found about 10 minutes later.... How long from the time you hid it to the time it was found? Quote Link to comment
+jhauser42 Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 How about the fastest from the hide to the FTF? I hid my first cache. Drove home and submitted it. The reviewer published it. The FTF was logged by someone who happened to be in the area. Total time 45 minutes. My latest hide was published about 4pm local time Friday afternoon. It was found about 10 minutes later.... How long from the time you hid it to the time it was found? Final cache submission (after a requested modification) was about 3:45. 15 minutes to publish, another 10 to FTF. Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted November 3, 2009 Share Posted November 3, 2009 I've had caches published while I was still typing up the page. Normally I post the coords the basics and submit, then go back and add the text and a few of them were published while I was still working on the -page. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.