+wrecklessweetie Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 ***I was bored tonight so I tried this out. Looks like after so many quotes in a post, you hit your limit of quotes?! I got all the way to the 2nd to last quote and it worked, but if I tried to add one more quote it wouldn't work.....I'm not an expert on it or anything.....just a thought*** if you leave a personal artifact in a public place, I don't think the law will protect you if someone picks it up Do you own a bike ? If you "pick up" things that belong to someone else you may be charged with theft. If you leave an empty can of pop in a park, and someone else picks it up, is that theft? That can has a real monetary value (5 cents deposit in Alberta), but I don't think anyone would charge that person with theft. When someone takes your cache they are stealing it. Property is protected under the laws of most countries. If I leave my bike sitting in the park unattended and you pick it up, you are stealing it. If you leave your bike in a non designated location, for 6 months, unattended (maybe you come by to visit every couple of months), and someone picks it up, to throw it out (or perhaps you've left your name on your bike, and they are going to return it to you), is that theft? I would say no. That is cleaning up the parks. The cache is never the property of anyone else other than the person who placed it. The caches you place are your property, they are your responsibility, they are yours, those who pick them up are stealing them. Private property is not a function of proximity, it is property. The cabin on Lake of the Woods that you visit for one week every two years is your property, you do not need to worry about being there to retain ownership, proximity has nothing to do with property. Yeah but you didn't leave your cabin on public lands did you? You presumably own the land around the cabin as well, so your analogy is hopelessly flawed. Now, if you owned the land your cache was on, I would agree with you. I believe, but don't know exactly where, that there are sections in the law about abandoned property. This is not an opinion, it is fact. You say this a lot, but are you a lawyer? I'm not. When the police stop you and you explain you were enroute to return my bike you will still be charged with theft. And when I tell them the bicycle has been there for 6 months, they'll charge you with littering. If what you say is true, then a whole lot of geocachers are guilty of 'theft' when they CITO. Most geocache owners understand this simple straightforward fact, people who steal geocaches may be called muggles but they are thieves. Or they see some box of junk that was left in the park, and decide to clean it up. Like I said, if they're a theif then so are most geocachers who've ever CITO'd an area. I saw a busted up vacuum cleaner in a park the other day, and thew away some of the pieces, does that make me a thief? How do I know the owner wasn't visiting the vacuum every day to see how it was doing? a private database of their own Do you understand FOIP ? Not really, do you? I'm assuming PC does though, so if any suggestions I make aren't compatible with FOIP, then I'm sure I'll hear about it. Do you intend to tell me that in this policy workgroup you are going to suggest that Parks Canada get an account on all the commercial listing services, and pay for it I presume, and then have a staff member from the Parks run PQ's and try to figure things out for themselves ? Do you think they should go to Terracaching.com and put in a sponsor request now ? Did I say that? I don't think I said that, but maybe it was one of my other personalities. My feeling is that if the whole anonymity thing is a problem, then before being allowed to place a cache in the parks, the cacher in question needs to go talk to a Parks person, and disclose to them their real name, and caching handle, and maybe sign a little thing that says "I will be good". This has the advantage that it is independent of any listing org, and is relatively low impact on the parks people. Link to comment
+ibycus Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 yeah, figured it out over in another thread. Think I'll mention this over in the gc website forum... Link to comment
+Oneyedjack Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 (edited) just a test, test Edited February 24, 2006 by Oneyedjack Link to comment
+Oneyedjack Posted February 24, 2006 Share Posted February 24, 2006 just a test, test Lets try again..... Link to comment
+lootsnoopers Posted February 25, 2006 Share Posted February 25, 2006 Just checking to see if it worked Link to comment
wwjd7 Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Lets see if it works this time... Link to comment
smacktight Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Yes, test test. it seems I made a post in another forum and mine didn't update. Link to comment
smacktight Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Nope, didn't work. Try try again. Link to comment
smacktight Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Yup, finially made the cross-over, from chump to geek. Link to comment
+Snoope Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 Last test I think can not get photo to come up!!! Link to comment
+CYBret Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 I am testing the new developmental version of Spellbound for Firefox bronzer. This is cool, it seems to work very well. :-) Bret P.S. Click HERE if you need it. Link to comment
+CYBret Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 Ummm...that of course should be browser. Bret Link to comment
wwjd7 Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 Lets see if it works this time... Yep'r Link to comment
smacktight Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 Yup, finially made the cross-over, from chump to geek. Alas, my tenth post, I should now be a cacher and changed my avitar at the same time. Woo Hoo Link to comment
+Faith the Aquariaqueen Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 do i have this right, yet? Link to comment
+Cryptid Posted February 28, 2006 Share Posted February 28, 2006 (edited) TEST Edited February 28, 2006 by Cruiserdude Link to comment
compost93 Posted March 1, 2006 Share Posted March 1, 2006 testing testing testingtesting!!! Do you read!! o0o this is so much fun! Link to comment
+mailman72432 Posted March 2, 2006 Share Posted March 2, 2006 (edited) did it change? why, yes, yes it did change. Edited March 2, 2006 by mailman72432 Link to comment
+Jimblonduk Posted March 3, 2006 Share Posted March 3, 2006 Just a ickle test.... again Link to comment
+Lakebum Posted March 4, 2006 Share Posted March 4, 2006 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.0"> <Placemark> <name>disney world</name> <open>1</open> <address>Disney World, USA</address> <styleUrl>root://styleMaps#default+nicon=0x304+hicon=0x314</styleUrl> <Point> <coordinates>-81.583699,28.410067,0</coordinates> </Point> </Placemark> </kml> Link to comment
+dorkfish Posted March 4, 2006 Share Posted March 4, 2006 this is a test. beeeeeeeeep Link to comment
+GOT GPS? Posted March 5, 2006 Share Posted March 5, 2006 (edited) This is a TABLE test [table 1 3 0] 1|2|test 16798789789797979799879797979|4|5|6|7 1^~right with colspan 2^333|=center with colspan 3^1|2|left with colspan 4^1|=center without colspan|3|4|5|6|7 5^1|blablabla|3|4|5 6^1|2|3|4|5|6|7 [/table] Looks like no tables Edited March 5, 2006 by GOT GPS? Link to comment
Recommended Posts