+Metaphor Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I would be willing to do Maryland. We've held a Cache Across MD for several years. It's a large undertaking but well worth it. The CAM hide has a few requirements that make it a fun adventure for all cachers. I think DaisyChain would be an excellent hider. Her caching area is also the second most beautiful part of Maryland... If two were needed in Maryland, I'd be willing to set one up here on Maryland's Eastern Shore. Link to comment
+Vinny & Sue Team Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Looking forward to this challenge!!! Thanks for the opportunity to be part of it! Here is my food for thought..... I still think that one cache per state should be the rule. I understand some states are HUGE....but anyone seriously taking on this challenge would know that travel is going to be the norm. If they want all the caches, where ever its located in a given state, they'll find a way to get there. Who knows, placing one cache just may inspire travel to a part of a state that sees few cachers. (Yes, Wisconsin has those areas). The only problem with having only one cache per state is that it keeps the person who owns that cache from finding all 50 of the caches. Now I don't have a problem with saying that you can just count the one you hid instead of having to find one in your state, but other people might not agree with that sentiment. I can imagine that some people might decide not to do all fifty because they refuse to count their own as one of the fifty. It does spoil the fun, just a smidgeon, for the cache owner. Also, if there were two caches in each state, it would help to assure that at least one of them would probably be available exactly when someone wanted to go to that state. In most such hunts and contests which have been run (i.e., at the regional level), the hider is automatically given credit for the caches which she/he hid, i.e., in this case, the cache hidden in their own state. I suggest that the same automatic credit for find be extended in this case as well. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 I would be willing to do Maryland. Added to the list! THANKS! Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 Looking forward to this challenge!!! Thanks for the opportunity to be part of it! Here is my food for thought..... I still think that one cache per state should be the rule. I understand some states are HUGE....but anyone seriously taking on this challenge would know that travel is going to be the norm. If they want all the caches, where ever its located in a given state, they'll find a way to get there. Who knows, placing one cache just may inspire travel to a part of a state that sees few cachers. (Yes, Wisconsin has those areas). The only problem with having only one cache per state is that it keeps the person who owns that cache from finding all 50 of the caches. Now I don't have a problem with saying that you can just count the one you hid instead of having to find one in your state, but other people might not agree with that sentiment. I can imagine that some people might decide not to do all fifty because they refuse to count their own as one of the fifty. It does spoil the fun, just a smidgeon, for the cache owner. Also, if there were two caches in each state, it would help to assure that at least one of them would probably be available exactly when someone wanted to go to that state. In most such hunts and contests which have been run (i.e., at the regional level), the hider is automatically given credit for the caches which she/he hid, i.e., in this case, the cache hidden in their own state. I suggest that the same automatic credit for find be extended in this case as well. I agree. If you have found 49 of the states and are hider on the 50th, I don't think there would be a question that you earned the final. In my book you are some kind of uber-cacher. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) I can't edit the list on page 2 anymore for some reason. Here is the current list: Alabama - wesleykey Alaska - AKStafford Arizona Arkansas California - Mystery Ink Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida - spot-trotter Georgia - Rebel Hawaii Idaho - Team Jsam Illinois - Beffums Indiana - sept1c_tank Iowa - The Northwood Goonies Kansas - k_statealan Kentucky - SG-MIN Louisiana - Team Gryarvold Maine - Haffy Maryland - DaisyChain Massachusetts - BlkSqrl413 & MrsBlksqrl Michigan - IAMTHATERO or Team MTJ Minnesota - Pto Mississippi Missouri - OzarksJim or Jhawk or smilingsteeles Montana Nebraska - StarBrand Nevada - BadAndy (can do Jackpot area) New Hampshire New Jersey - Rustysurfer22 New Mexico New York - wefindall North Carolina - erikwillke North Dakota - Codfish116 Ohio - oscar478 or Hillbilly-Rockstar Oklahoma -Kand Oregon - Riddlers Pennsylvania - jtd 18801 Rhode Island South Carolina - llatnek South Dakota - martinell Tennessee - salpal Texas - AMMOMAN Utah Vermont - Tharagleb Virginia - treasure hunter Washington - Fishiam West Virginia - oldnavy59 or Morgan's Marauders Wisconsin - AstroD-Team Wyoming - dblrngr Final cache - Center of US? Puzzle - Will use simple numeric addition. Edited June 18, 2006 by Blue Power Ranger Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) ...and the remaining openings: Arizona Arkansas Colorado Connecticut Delaware Hawaii Kansas Mississippi Montana Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico New York Rhode Island Tennessee Utah West Virginia Just 16 15 14 13 states to go!!! Edited June 18, 2006 by Blue Power Ranger Link to comment
+Velvet Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 If someone will be kind enough to volunteer to cover my moving costs, I will happily take Hawaii off your hands Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 I will do new york. Got it! Link to comment
+Morgan's Marauders Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 If we do not get a native West Virginian to take it, I live close enough to cover it. But I'm sure someone will show up eventually. I'll take it for now. Title suggestion: The AMERIcache! Link to comment
+Beffums Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Since I have Illinois, I'd vote for letting Sept1c_tank have Indiana, with me as a backup in the future if he needs cache maintenance, etc. I think the overall plan is great, and I think we basically have it set down. 1 cache per state (will revise if needed in the future) all hiders get auto-credit for their state (if need be, just make sure you have one other find in that state on *any* cache -- there, you cached in your state) all traditional hides - no multis no puzzles no mysteries (except the final) Final in DC area (have a hider for it and everything) Codes in each cache that add up to the final coords (hmm, anyone friends with a math person? where's fizzymagic when you need him/her). photo verification required for each cache no need to e-mail for the final coords, but maybe the only way to e-mail asking if you have the final coords correct is if you have photos uploaded for each of your 50 finds? And, on the final stage, a note that the series owners reserve the right to delete your find on the final cache if it is found that you did not personally complete each of the 50 legs? now to work out details. what's the name? do we have a max distance from a highway? (if so, US highway? interstate? state highway? just no 15 miles hikes from the closest road??) when are we hoping to start placing them? and is there an order of placement that BPR would like? (um, I'm sure there are plenty more details to be listed, but these are what I came up with so far) Link to comment
+salpal Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I am willing to do Tennessee. Link to comment
+SmartSapper Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Title suggestion: The AMERIcache! This gets my vote! Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 now to work out details. Been working on it but I need help. So far we have: 50 State Cache Guidelines 1. There will be one cache hidden per state for a total of 50 caches. 2. Each of these caches will be a standard cache 3. The cache size should be regular or large (ammo can preferred) 4. Terrain and Difficulty for these caches should not exceed 2.5. We want these to be accessible to the vast majority of cachers. 5. Caches should contain standard cache swag with a focus on quality (not expense) including a logbook. 6. The inside lid of each cache will be inscribed with a 5-digit code that will be used for the final puzzle cache. 7. Caches should be hidden in an area that is somehow representative of your state. 8. Cache descriptions (online) should contain an explanation of why that location represents your state. 9. Caches are available to all cachers whether pursuing the 50-State challenge or now. 10. If a cacher wishes to pursue the 50 state challenge, they should include a photo with their online log. If for whatever reason a photo is impossible. Please make alternate arrangements with the cache owner for verification of the find. 11. Since people will potentially be traveling great distances to these caches, they should be maintained regularly to insure they are in good condition and ready for finders. 12. The final cache will be located in _____? 13. Blue Power Ranger will maintain the master list of cache codes and will be responsible for insuring that there are active caches in all 50 states. For initial launch, I think we should do a test run with 5 states and see how that goes and then do a phased launch of remaining states. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 Title suggestion: The AMERIcache! This gets my vote! I like this too. How about "The great AMERIcache Challenge" Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 Since I have Illinois, I'd vote for letting Sept1c_tank have Indiana, with me as a backup in the future if he needs cache maintenance, etc. Done Link to comment
+Team Gryarvold Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Sounds like it is coming along nicely. What you have done up so far gets our vote. Just let us know when you want us to place the cache. Link to comment
+oldnavy59 Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I live in kenova WV and would like to do the WV cache I like this idea Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) I live in kenova WV and would like to do the WV cache I like this idea Since you are in WV - I will go ahead and add you as the primary there and keep Morgan's Marauders as backup. Thanks to both!!! Edited June 17, 2006 by Blue Power Ranger Link to comment
+BadAndy Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I'll take Nevada if no one else steps up. It's well within my maintenance range (45 miles to Jackpot) and I go there often. Link to comment
k_statealan Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) I can take Kansas. Live near I-70 (runs length of state from E-W). Might also be a good centralized location for the final cache. My brother, powercatjeffy, would probably also help out. My idea for a place puts it about halfway between our houses. Edited June 17, 2006 by k_statealan Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 I'll take Nevada if no one else steps up. It's well within my maintenance range (45 miles to Jackpot) and I go there often. Cool thanks. I have some interesting memories of a night in Jackpot. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) I can take Kansas. Live near I-70 (runs length of state from E-W). Might also be a good centralized location for the final cache. Thanks! Are you familiar with the geographic center of the USA in KS? Is there an area we can do a final there? Edited June 17, 2006 by Blue Power Ranger Link to comment
+SmartSapper Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 A logistical problem just occurred to me regarding placement of the final and placement of coordinates in the 50 primaries: The way I see it, the final has to be in place FIRST, and once the addition gets worked out, each State cache-owner gets his part of the code emailed to him, so they can place their caches. Am I missing something? Or can it be worked out differently? Link to comment
+Mary&Dave Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 10. If a cacher wishes to pursue the 50 state challenge, they should include a photo with their online log. If for whatever reason a photo is impossible. Please make alternate arrangements with the cache owner for verification of the find. Does this imply that the "final" cache would only be findable by someone who has found all 50 of the others? I think the chances of it being brute-forced/accidentally discovered would be a lot higher than someone completing the entire quest. Actually, I think it would be just as cool for cachers throughout the country to join forces, help each other find caches and solve the puzzle, and all get together to find the end (even though not every one of them has visited every single state cache). Another suggestion -- if you've volunteered for a state, take it back to your local caching forums and get input from the community there. You can probably get some great suggestions on what location really represents your state as a whole. Thanks for putting together this great idea, Blue Power Ranger. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 A logistical problem just occurred to me regarding placement of the final and placement of coordinates in the 50 primaries: The way I see it, the final has to be in place FIRST, and once the addition gets worked out, each State cache-owner gets his part of the code emailed to him, so they can place their caches. Am I missing something? Or can it be worked out differently? Initially, I think we can deploy some of the caches even before the final is worked out. The math can be adjusted with the final placed caches or possibly even in the the "given" starting numbers on the final. Am I wrong? Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) 10. If a cacher wishes to pursue the 50 state challenge, they should include a photo with their online log. If for whatever reason a photo is impossible. Please make alternate arrangements with the cache owner for verification of the find. Does this imply that the "final" cache would only be findable by someone who has found all 50 of the others? I think the chances of it being brute-forced/accidentally discovered would be a lot higher than someone completing the entire quest. Actually, I think it would be just as cool for cachers throughout the country to join forces, help each other find caches and solve the puzzle, and all get together to find the end (even though not every one of them has visited every single state cache). Another suggestion -- if you've volunteered for a state, take it back to your local caching forums and get input from the community there. You can probably get some great suggestions on what location really represents your state as a whole. Thanks for putting together this great idea, Blue Power Ranger. Yes, I think the final should only be for the finder of the whole thing, each and every state. With this many numbers involved in the equation, I think brute-forcing coordinates is unlikely. I want to avoid people simply being able to post the puzzle numbers for each state in a forum post and having the whole thing solved in a month and therefore let the air out of the balloon. The great preference would be if the final could be on somebody's private property near Lebannon, KS (near center of US). Therefore secure from the casual passerby. GREAT SUGGESTION to work within your local forums to select a location representative of your state. Edited June 17, 2006 by Blue Power Ranger Link to comment
GeoGilly Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 I'll see if I can put an HTML template together for you. I think this is a great idea, and sounds like a lot of fun. I would volunteer to place a cache, but I've not done that yet, and I'd be nervous about making something this serious my first one. However, if you don't get any volunteers for Arizona, I'll tentatively do so. Link to comment
GeoGilly Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Still need help with someone coming up with a cache page template. Anyone out there that can do this. I don't have the skills to come up with a cool look... Actually, what's wrong with this? The colors are a bit bright for me, but I like the numbered state thing. Link to comment
+oldnavy59 Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 can the hiders also be eligible????? Link to comment
+budd-rdc Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 10. If a cacher wishes to pursue the 50 state challenge, they should include a photo with their online log. If for whatever reason a photo is impossible. Please make alternate arrangements with the cache owner for verification of the find. Does this imply that the "final" cache would only be findable by someone who has found all 50 of the others? I think the chances of it being brute-forced/accidentally discovered would be a lot higher than someone completing the entire quest. Actually, I think it would be just as cool for cachers throughout the country to join forces, help each other find caches and solve the puzzle, and all get together to find the end (even though not every one of them has visited every single state cache). Another suggestion -- if you've volunteered for a state, take it back to your local caching forums and get input from the community there. You can probably get some great suggestions on what location really represents your state as a whole. Thanks for putting together this great idea, Blue Power Ranger. Yes, I think the final should only be for the finder of the whole thing, each and every state. With this many numbers involved in the equation, I think brute-forcing coordinates is unlikely. I want to avoid people simply being able to post the puzzle numbers for each state in a forum post and having the whole thing solved in a month and therefore let the air out of the balloon. The great preference would be if the final could be on somebody's private property near Lebannon, KS (near center of US). Therefore secure from the casual passerby. GREAT SUGGESTION to work within your local forums to select a location representative of your state. I think placing the final near the geographical center of the U.S. is a great idea. I ran across a few caches located on private property (with permission) while caching in Kansas recently, so I hope that works out. As for brute-forcers, you don't want to underestimate their abilities! (Once the general area is known, it's possible to come up with "likely solutions" without all the numbers - I've seen this done many times) However, it's unlikely they'll travel all the way to Kansas to take a shot. I suppose Kansas cachers have some advantage (for brute-forcing), but I don't recall any caching controversies from them, so I think we are OK there. Having said that, I would keep the puzzle for the final straightforward, since the point of doing this is the journey. With a good community participation on this project, I doubt we'll need to worry about cheating since the bad publicity can be quite severe around here. Link to comment
+Team Gryarvold Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 After all the work going into this with the hope that everyone gets to have a bit fun and travel, I would hate to think that someone will cheat and ruin it or nullify it completely. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 Still need help with someone coming up with a cache page template. Anyone out there that can do this. I don't have the skills to come up with a cool look... Actually, what's wrong with this? The colors are a bit bright for me, but I like the numbered state thing. I just know there are folks out there who could do so much better. I'd be happy to send you or anyone the html file if you wanted to take a crack at improvement. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 if you don't get any volunteers for Arizona, I'll tentatively do so. Thanks we'll keep you in mind then if nobody else in AZ steps up. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 I think placing the final near the geographical center of the U.S. is a great idea. I ran across a few caches located on private property (with permission) while caching in Kansas recently, so I hope that works out. If we don't hear something soon, we can post in regional forums for the area and see what pops up. Link to comment
+treasure_hunter Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Suggestion: Americache the Beautiful Series Link to comment
+DaisyChain Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 I would be willing to do Maryland. Added to the list! THANKS! Thank you, I'm honored. And aready receiving ideas from the gang @ Maryland Geocaching Society. Link to comment
+oscar478 Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 This is awesome... aside from a few varying opinions, this forum thread has found willing folks in what 35+ states now in exactly 72 hours... that's cool. I like Americache for the name. I think a note should be made by those organizing this, that each state cache should follow some sort of naming convention, so all the caches can be found and recognized, like "Americache - Ohio". I wonder what the estimated cost to complete this would be? On a dedicated route, it's probably at least what 6000 - 7000 miles at the low end? Plus tix to Hawaii, maybe to Alaska as well... That's about $1500 in travel alone... and how many AA batteries?? Link to comment
+NotNutts Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Cool idea! I'd volunteer for IL if I weren't a military gypsy. For a name, how about 'Cache Across America' or 'Cache Quest USA' I hope these will all be quality caches. 50 lampposts would be anti-climactic. However, wheelchair accessible might not be a bad plan. One idea might be a requirement to place it near a monument or historical area that represents the state. IE the Alamo for TX, a ski resort for CO etc. Link to comment
+NotNutts Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Oh yeah, about the center thing: - The geographical center of the lower 48 states lies outside of Lebanon, Kansas, in the middle of a hog farm. - The geographical center of all 50 states is located 17 miles west of Castle Rock, South Dakota. - The geodetic center of the U.S. is found approximately 42 miles south of Lebanon, Kansas. (Note: A geodetic survey makes corrections to account for the curvature of the Earth.) Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Since I have Illinois, I'd vote for letting Sept1c_tank have Indiana, with me as a backup in the future if he needs cache maintenance, etc. I think the overall plan is great, and I think we basically have it set down. 1 cache per state (will revise if needed in the future) all hiders get auto-credit for their state (if need be, just make sure you have one other find in that state on *any* cache -- there, you cached in your state) all traditional hides - no multis no puzzles no mysteries (except the final) Final in DC area (have a hider for it and everything) Codes in each cache that add up to the final coords (hmm, anyone friends with a math person? where's fizzymagic when you need him/her). photo verification required for each cache no need to e-mail for the final coords, but maybe the only way to e-mail asking if you have the final coords correct is if you have photos uploaded for each of your 50 finds? And, on the final stage, a note that the series owners reserve the right to delete your find on the final cache if it is found that you did not personally complete each of the 50 legs? now to work out details. what's the name? do we have a max distance from a highway? (if so, US highway? interstate? state highway? just no 15 miles hikes from the closest road??) when are we hoping to start placing them? and is there an order of placement that BPR would like? (um, I'm sure there are plenty more details to be listed, but these are what I came up with so far) I am a math person. Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 A logistical problem just occurred to me regarding placement of the final and placement of coordinates in the 50 primaries: The way I see it, the final has to be in place FIRST, and once the addition gets worked out, each State cache-owner gets his part of the code emailed to him, so they can place their caches. Am I missing something? Or can it be worked out differently? No, I can take 50 random numbers and use them to compute any coordinates desired, and make it so that nobody can short the multi. Link to comment
+Ltljon Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 I'd love to do Colorado but since I don't live anywhere near there I could help out (Eric?) with the western part of NC. Could place one within 1 mile of I-40. Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 18, 2006 Author Share Posted June 18, 2006 A logistical problem just occurred to me regarding placement of the final and placement of coordinates in the 50 primaries: The way I see it, the final has to be in place FIRST, and once the addition gets worked out, each State cache-owner gets his part of the code emailed to him, so they can place their caches. Am I missing something? Or can it be worked out differently? No, I can take 50 random numbers and use them to compute any coordinates desired, and make it so that nobody can short the multi. So... if I were to start distributing 5-digit codes now, you could work with whatever I gave out later? Link to comment
+Team JSAM Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 (edited) Just wondering if anybody has emailed a reviewer to see if this is even possible and if it will work/get approved. Just curious. <removed by poster> Edited June 18, 2006 by Team Jsam Link to comment
+Blue Power Ranger Posted June 18, 2006 Author Share Posted June 18, 2006 Just wondering if anybody has emailed a reviewer to see if this is even possible and if it will work/get approved. Just curious. <removed by poster> I emailed my local reviewer and received the following reply: I've skimmed your thread, before your email actually. There is even a discussion in the reviewer forum about it already. We are keeping an eye on the thread and will see what you guys come up with. Looks like they want to see a final plan first. I don't see anything we could possibly be doing falling outside guidelines. Link to comment
+Tharagleb Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 A logistical problem just occurred to me regarding placement of the final and placement of coordinates in the 50 primaries: The way I see it, the final has to be in place FIRST, and once the addition gets worked out, each State cache-owner gets his part of the code emailed to him, so they can place their caches. Am I missing something? Or can it be worked out differently? No, I can take 50 random numbers and use them to compute any coordinates desired, and make it so that nobody can short the multi. So... if I were to start distributing 5-digit codes now, you could work with whatever I gave out later? Yes, once we have the coords for the final I can arrange a way for the 50 numbers to go into a formula and have that produce the coords. Link to comment
k_statealan Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 I can take Kansas. Live near I-70 (runs length of state from E-W). Might also be a good centralized location for the final cache. Thanks! Are you familiar with the geographic center of the USA in KS? Is there an area we can do a final there? I've been near there a couple of times in my life but its a bit out of the way for me. Probably a 3 - 3 1/2 hr drive. Also, there is already a virtual at that location. http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_detai...7a-1f08abf8cd46 It is also probably a good 1 1/2 hour drive from interstate (either I-70 in Kansas or I-80 in Nebraska). I can think of several areas more accessible (for me and other cachers) that don't have any caches near them. Link to comment
+Team Gryarvold Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Can someone please explain to me in laymans terms about the coordinate math chatter that is going on for this plan? I am curious as to how that is going to help us in placing our cache in the area that we are supposed to choose to represent this series. I have a tentative location already in mind that would be great and need to know if I get to choose the location or the math cords do. Just really confused at this point, so please help. Also for alot of states placing a large cache in an area like say the Alamo, or at the state capitol building where there is alot of foot traffic, muggles and lack of cover for hiding is maybe not a great idea. There are chances that it be mistaken for a bomb or taken completely just the for heck of it. It seems to me that it would be better to place them in an area this is still representative of the state but not really in the main stream of things, or sort of off the beaten track some in smaller towns and still be accessible to the average joe or jane. Link to comment
GeoGilly Posted June 18, 2006 Share Posted June 18, 2006 Quick and dirty: Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 These will all adjust to fit into the space for descriptions on the cache page. Suggestions or other ideas? I can code just about anything, but coming up with ideas is the hard part Link to comment
Recommended Posts