+atascadero Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I ran across this portable tripod while looking for a good portable and small tripod for my geocaching jaunts. It's called the gorillapod. I was just wondering if anyone has used one or has heard how well they work? Also any suggestions on a small portable tripod are welcome. I'm thinking of something that will fit easily in a day pack. Thanks ahead of time. Quote Link to comment
+Packanack Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I cache alone and use an UltrapodII for those self portraits my family thinks are another example of my lack of sanity (as if geocaching weren't enough). Sometimes I find myself in a place where I want a picture with me in it. The Ultrapod can be strapped to a tree. Small fits easily in backpack. Quote Link to comment
Dosido Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I too use an UltrapodII - pretty sweet small tripod that easily fits into the pack, and velcro wraps around small trees. However, this gorillapod thing looks sweet. You don't need a flat surface, or the proper sized branch. Might have to pick one of these up! Thanks for the link! Quote Link to comment
+briansnat Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 (edited) The Gorillapod looks pretty cool but a bit on the large side. I've used an Ultrapod and Ultrapod II for years with good results. I like that they can be used like a regular tripod, or fastened to tree branches or poles. The regular Ultrapod fits in the palm of your hand and the Ultrapod II isn't much bigger. I think I might check out that Gorillapod though. Edited April 12, 2006 by briansnat Quote Link to comment
+Mule Ears Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I have a folding mini-tripod that's very similar to the Ultrapods, but lacks the swivel head. I see that REI.com has the Ultrapod I for 10.00 and the II for 15.00. When my 'pod gets lost or broken, I'll snag one of these as a replacement--they look great! The Gorillapod (20.00 REI) looks clever, but I wonder if it isn't a solution in search of a problem. I haven't caught myself wishing that I could wrap my tripod around a tree branch; I've always been able to find some surface I could stand it on or velcro it to. Quote Link to comment
+4BOWS Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I too have an Ultrapod and love it, but that Gorillapod looks awfully interesting. Quote Link to comment
+Ed & Julie Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I have an el-cheapo tiny tripod that I got at Wal-mart for a buck. It's small enough to fit in my hand...works well enough for me. Ed Quote Link to comment
+Moose Mob Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 I too have an Ultrapod and love it, but that Gorillapod looks awfully interesting. I have a mini tripod and I have troble getting a level picture whil balancing it on a rock, tree stump, whichever. I think I will try the gorillapod to see if it can balance better in wierd positions and uneven surfaces. Quote Link to comment
+BigWhiteTruck Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Gimmick alert. Sorry folks, any tripod can stand on an uneven surface, that's why they have three legs. Three is the magic number because you can describe a plane using any three points in space. Quote Link to comment
+Team LaLonde Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 (edited) We used a Slik mini tripod - about 1' to 2.5' - for our trip to Nevada. It worked perfectly and was very convenient to carry even in the crowded city and casinos. Edited April 12, 2006 by Team LaLonde Quote Link to comment
+New England n00b Posted April 12, 2006 Share Posted April 12, 2006 Gimmick alert. Sorry folks, any tripod can stand on an uneven surface, that's why they have three legs. Three is the magic number because you can describe a plane using any three points in space. Seems like 'ease of leveling &stablizing' is the issue. Sure and three legged tripod can balance ya', but how easy is it to modify leg length to get level? Seems like this would be a lot easier than flipping a lock, trying to position it and relock it. Quote Link to comment
+atascadero Posted April 13, 2006 Author Share Posted April 13, 2006 Thanks for all the replys. I'll look in to several of your suggestions. I guess this just might be to new for many to have seen and used. I just might gamble on one since it seems like a great glove compartment option also but we shall see. Thanks again. Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted April 13, 2006 Share Posted April 13, 2006 I have one of those tripods similar to the one in briansnat's post. But, I also bought a Leki walking stick that converts to a monopod. It can be stuck in the ground to get a picture from a taller position. Both are very handy. Quote Link to comment
+gluteusmaximus92 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 If you want a super cheap, super-portable tripod that people will take notice of, build a soda bottle tripod. Directions at this link: http://www.jakeludington.com/project_studi...cap_tripod.html Quote Link to comment
+joinsmith97 Posted April 14, 2006 Share Posted April 14, 2006 You can always use the monster-pod Quote Link to comment
Dosido Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Gimmick alert. Sorry folks, any tripod can stand on an uneven surface, that's why they have three legs. Three is the magic number because you can describe a plane using any three points in space. Ah, theoretically correct, but in the real world, that doesn't mean much. It's very easy to flip a small tripod with a camera on it if the plane of the legs is not flat and/or the camera weight is not evenly distributed. The gorrila pod would allow easy manipulation of the legs to counteract this problem. Quote Link to comment
+wandererrob Posted April 17, 2006 Share Posted April 17, 2006 Gimmick alert. Sorry folks, any tripod can stand on an uneven surface, that's why they have three legs. Three is the magic number because you can describe a plane using any three points in space. True, but you can't easily attach a normal tripod to a tree limb. Personally, I kinda like the versatility ofthis thing. Might have to get me one. Quote Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 I saw the Gorillapod mentioned on another forum, and it received good reviews there. I plan to get one for an upcoming trip. Amazon has them for just over $20. I wonder if my G3 is over the weight limit though. It's kind of a big camera. Since this thread is a few months old... has anyone here got and tried a Gorillapod? Jamie Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 You can always use the monster-pod There's no way that I'm trusting that with my camera. Quote Link to comment
+nfa Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 I have owned and used a gorillapod since about a week after the OP last year...it is way better than any other tripod that I have owned/used/seen. It weighs a couple of ounces, takes up a negligible amount of space (perhaps a touch more then the one the briansnat showed), and can set up and support your camera on surfaces that simply would not work for an ordinary tripod...it is infinitely adjustable as regards levelling. The hidden bonus is that the legs are bendable enough, and rubberized enough, to grab onto vertical stuff like trees, vines, poles, etc....thus making picture possible in places where there aren't other things to rest an ordinary tripod on up off of the ground...the perspective makes lots of my shots look as though there is another person with me, taking the picture. All in all, a great geocaching accessory. Jamie - NFA Quote Link to comment
+Klatch Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 You can always use the monster-pod There's no way that I'm trusting that with my camera. One would think that after collecting sand, dust, leaf bits, little twigs and such, that it would lose its adhesiveness. Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 You can always use the monster-pod There's no way that I'm trusting that with my camera. One would think that after collecting sand, dust, leaf bits, little twigs and such, that it would lose its adhesiveness. Before you know it, your investment is smashing on the ground. Quote Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 I wonder if my G3 is over the weight limit though. It's kind of a big camera. My S3 is on the heavy side for the regular pod. They have a heftier version I'll be picking up as soon as I get a little extra. It's about twice as much as the regular. Quote Link to comment
+sbell111 Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) I wonder if my G3 is over the weight limit though. It's kind of a big camera.My S3 is on the heavy side for the regular pod. They have a heftier version I'll be picking up as soon as I get a little extra. It's about twice as much as the regular.If yours is on the heavy side, there is no way it could handle my 20d. Edited December 1, 2006 by sbell111 Quote Link to comment
+TotemLake Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) geez... another answer to a stale thread. Edited December 1, 2006 by TotemLake Quote Link to comment
+Jamie Z Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 My S3 is on the heavy side for the regular pod. They have a heftier version I'll be picking up as soon as I get a little extra. It's about twice as much as the regular. Nikon Coolpix S3? Fuji Finepix S3? Canon Powershot S3? Jamie Quote Link to comment
+Dgwphotos Posted December 1, 2006 Share Posted December 1, 2006 My S3 is on the heavy side for the regular pod. They have a heftier version I'll be picking up as soon as I get a little extra. It's about twice as much as the regular. Nikon Coolpix S3? Fuji Finepix S3? Canon Powershot S3? Jamie I suspect that they mean the Canon. The Fuji Finepix is way too heavy. According to the B&H catalog, it is 26 ounces. The Canon is 14.5 oz. The Nikon is small enough at 4.8 oz. The Gorillapod has a load capacity of 12.5 oz. Quote Link to comment
me_chris Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 There is an SLR gorilla pod that holds my Nikon D70s just fine (provided I don't try to extend it really far sideways) I also use an ultrapod II for hiking and such since it folds up nice and small (and flat!) - the gorilla pod is nice but bulky... for those long hikes to a cache site, try the ultrapod II Quote Link to comment
CoyoteRed Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 My S3 is on the heavy side for the regular pod. They have a heftier version I'll be picking up as soon as I get a little extra. It's about twice as much as the regular. Nikon Coolpix S3? Fuji Finepix S3? Canon Powershot S3? Jamie I didn't realize there was more than one. It is the Canon S3 IS. Looking at the GorillaPod site, I see they now have 3 versions. The largest will handle an SLR with a zoom lens. I will need the middle one for the Canon S3. My Canon A75 could use the smallest one. Quote Link to comment
+themeecer Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Run .. don't walk, to go buy this. I was fortunate that the store I was looking for a trekking pole/monopod in didn't have what I want. The salesperson suggested the gorillapod. I tried it on a chain they had as a divider and it worked perfectly. It takes up a little more room than the mini tripod I had been using but will work anywhere .. and I mean anywhere. Its legs have rubber all along its length so it is very grippy. I attached it to a fence, used it as a tripod on a rock, and even used it on my gear s***. This thing works! And it feels very solid. You will thank yourself for buying this. I do. Thank you Chris. Quote Link to comment
+Happy Humphrey Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I've used one for a couple of years. It works as suggested! Quote Link to comment
+CYBret Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Keep an eye on ihavetohavethat.com. Every now and then you'll find a smaller cheaper version of the gorilla pod on sale there...usually priced two for one. I've bought several and used them as give aways at events. They work great with small digital cameras. Quote Link to comment
+intolerable Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I'm with the 'go get one' crowd. I picked up one after seeing a could of folks I hike with use them. Mine works great, just wish I'd found one that wasn't pink/purple Quote Link to comment
+carleenp Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 The Gorillapod works fine for me with a small camera. We have used it for caching photos on a number of ocassions, and yes the ability to wrap it around a tree limb and such is quite nice. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.