+Keith Watson Posted December 24, 2006 Share Posted December 24, 2006 1) Geese - Gaggle - uskerrich2000 2) Frogs - Army - JDandDD 3) Ferrets - Business - JDandDD 4) Humming Birds - Charm - JDandDD 5) Trout - Hover - VO2WW 6) Bears - Sleuth - Luc & Sweety 7) Crows - Murder - Yorkshire 8) Squirreles - Dray - Geofellas 9) Kittens - Kindle - northernpenguin 10) Bees - Grist Geofellas JDandDD is the winner with three correct. Quote Link to comment
+DocMagoo Posted December 25, 2006 Share Posted December 25, 2006 ...and Juicepig had post #1000 in the thread! Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 26, 2006 Share Posted December 26, 2006 Just back online after Christmas. Guess its up to me to do the next one. Will work on a question and get it up soon. Sorry about the delay. JD of JDandDD Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 Ok, after a little research, here's a question about a weather phenomenon that affects geocachers every year at this time, windchill. In 2001, Canada and the United States agreed to use a new, improved windchill formula. Here is the two part question: Who created the original windchill formula and what is considered the major problem that caused the original formula inaccurate? JDandDD Quote Link to comment
+VO2WW Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 As I understood it in my USAF days, Wind Chill used to be based on time it took for water to freeze outside tops of weather stations. It was changed to measure effect on exposed skin at ground level in more recent years. No idea who invented it except to guess Weather Service guys????? Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 That's part way there. JD Quote Link to comment
+northernpenguin Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 (edited) That's part way there. JD Pretty sure it was this guy! Edited December 27, 2006 by northernpenguin Quote Link to comment
+ElectroQTed Posted December 27, 2006 Share Posted December 27, 2006 Or maybe this guy: Quote Link to comment
+Couparangus Posted December 28, 2006 Author Share Posted December 28, 2006 In 2001, Canada and the United States agreed to use a new, improved windchill formula. Here is the two part question: Who created the original windchill formula and what is considered the major problem that caused the original formula inaccurate? I have no idea to whom we should credit the "new" wind chill measurement. I'm guessing the original one didn't factor in humidity or perhaps the cooling affect on actual bare skin. Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 Didn't expect this one to be so difficult!! VO2WW is on the right track about the reason. And its not the Weather guys. JD Quote Link to comment
+lordfishman Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 I did some research and found this The original wind chill formula was derived from experiments conducted in 1939 by Antarctic explorers, Paul Siple and Charles Passel. They appartenly figured out how long it took for water to freeze in a small plastic cylinder when it was placed outside in the wind. However there are differences between a human body and a plastic jug filled with water, most notably the fact that people produce body heat. As well, the wind speed used in the formula is measured ten metres above the ground, usually at airport weather stations. At this height, the winds are faster than those at 1.5 metres, the height of an average person. As a result, the method produced a colder wind chill than people actually experienced. http://www.restena.lu/meteo_lcd/papers/win...wwindchill.html Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 28, 2006 Share Posted December 28, 2006 That's it lordfishman . Over to you for the next question. JD Quote Link to comment
+lordfishman Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Here is something I came across last week when I was reading about strange christmas gifts of the past. I could not beleive they made this particular toy. Which current comic strip character (still going strong today) starred in a childrens comic book explaining splitting the atom. This comic had a forward written by a member of the manhattan project. and came out a few years after WWII. It came free with the childrens toy I read about (it would definately not pass safety standards today), for a bonus what was the name of that toy. Quote Link to comment
+JDandDD Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 By coincidence I know this one but I'll let someone else answer since I was making up a question just before this. Wanted to say that I actually saw one of these as a kid (nope didn't own, my friend did) and have to say I think we are all lucky to still be here, especially knowing my friend. Forgot all about it so thanks for the memory. JD Quote Link to comment
+northernpenguin Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Here is something I came across last week when I was reading about strange christmas gifts of the past. I could not beleive they made this particular toy. Which current comic strip character (still going strong today) starred in a childrens comic book explaining splitting the atom. This comic had a forward written by a member of the manhattan project. and came out a few years after WWII. It came free with the childrens toy I read about (it would definately not pass safety standards today), for a bonus what was the name of that toy. Brandishing the darts. I'm not sure just how many cartoon characters have been around that long. So I'm going to start with... SUPERMAN! (Did I even hit the dartboard? The wall the dartboard is on? The correct pub?) Quote Link to comment
+lordfishman Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 The character is actually a comic strip character and not a comic book character as far as I know. Quote Link to comment
+Juicepig Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 (Did I even hit the dartboard? The wall the dartboard is on? The correct pub?) Looks like you hit the big biker guy in the corner with your dart - he doesn't look to happy ok, How about Garfield, he seems like the advanced quantum physics type of character Quote Link to comment
+huskerrich2000 Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Well I not certain of the answer, but I'll fire my dart toward Dilbert though he seems to be more toward office politics than teaching the Manhattan Project. Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 Obviously, it must be Mary Worth. Her no-nonsense approach to telling it like it is would be just the thing the nation needed to protect against the Red Menace. (Speaking of which, maybe it was Dennis the Menace.) dave Quote Link to comment
+lordfishman Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 The comic strip recently celebrated a milestone for a large number of years in publication. Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 The comic strip recently celebrated a milestone for a large number of years in publication. Blondie. dave Quote Link to comment
+lordfishman Posted December 29, 2006 Share Posted December 29, 2006 (edited) Yes that was the comic strip! And blondie was one of the characters the "splitting the atom" comic Check it out... http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/atomictoys/dagwood.htm Now can anyone get the bonus of what toy bundled that comic with it? Edited December 29, 2006 by lordfishman Quote Link to comment
+Couparangus Posted December 31, 2006 Author Share Posted December 31, 2006 I trust everyone had a great holiday, like I did, and is looking forward to a rewarding new year, just as I am! I'd like to first thank everyone for making this discussion so successful and look forward to learning even more from our learned Geocompatriots! I think I need to re-post the general guidelines for the Canadian Geopub Quiz, just to keep things on track. Particularly with respect to protocol & topics. A person must answer a question correctly before they may post a question of their own. If in doubt, the person whom asked the question will determine which person did indeed answer it correctly. If there's still confusion at this point, let me know and I'll solve the problem for ya'. Let's keep it relevent to our common interests (Geocaching) and therefore within these loose categories: - Geocaching - Navigation - Weather - Wildlife - A funny thing happened on my way to the cache - Geomatics/graphy/physics etc - The Canadian hiking experience - Cycling, Canoeing, Kayaking or any other means of arriving at a cache. - Camping (I snuck a couple of new ones in there, hee hee) No cheating now, and no Googling or Wikipedia for the answers! Cheers! C-A Quote Link to comment
QuigleyJones Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 (I snuck a couple of new ones in there, hee hee) What ones would they be? Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Here's a super-easy one to start the new year right: Recently, my trusty Magellan started showing two "W" satellites: Why is it doing that now, and why wasn't it doing it before? dave Quote Link to comment
+Couparangus Posted January 2, 2007 Author Share Posted January 2, 2007 Hmmm....a firmware upgrade now allows it to see the WAAS satellites too? Quote Link to comment
+Keith Watson Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Those would be the WAAS satlitles. Wide Area Augmentation System. Wiki Link. I didn't have to look it up, but the link provides a greate description of what it is. Quote Link to comment
+northernpenguin Posted January 2, 2007 Share Posted January 2, 2007 Here's a super-easy one to start the new year right: Recently, my trusty Magellan started showing two "W" satellites: Why is it doing that now, and why wasn't it doing it before? dave You turned it on? Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 Those would be the WAAS satlitles. Wide Area Augmentation System. Wiki Link. I didn't have to look it up, but the link provides a greate description of what it is. You're partway there. What I want to know is why I recently started seeing two "W"s whereas previously I could only get one. dave Quote Link to comment
+AV Dezign Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 (edited) A new one went up not so long ago and the activation was pretty recent, some relocation occured with the old ones, and now they are two visible in your area. Edited January 3, 2007 by AV Dezign Quote Link to comment
CharlieZulu Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 A new one went up not so long ago and the activation was pretty recent, some relocation occured with the old ones, and now they are two visible in your area. What new bird has recently gone up that has the WAAS payload? Quote Link to comment
+Juicepig Posted January 3, 2007 Share Posted January 3, 2007 (edited) A new one went up not so long ago and the activation was pretty recent, some relocation occured with the old ones, and now they are two visible in your area. What new bird has recently gone up that has the WAAS payload? waasgull, as in "youu wascally waasgull!" Edited January 3, 2007 by Juicepig Quote Link to comment
+Fish Below The Ice Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 A new one went up not so long ago and the activation was pretty recent, some relocation occured with the old ones, and now they are two visible in your area. Good enough. Your question. dave Quote Link to comment
+AV Dezign Posted January 4, 2007 Share Posted January 4, 2007 A new one went up not so long ago and the activation was pretty recent, some relocation occured with the old ones, and now they are two visible in your area. What new bird has recently gone up that has the WAAS payload? I don't know the details, but I rememeber it being the topic of conversation at the time they dissapeared to be relocated, since at that time our accuracy here in Quebec went down by a magnitude for a few months while they sorted the whole thing out. As for the new question, I will leave it to the next one who wants it. Just say "Yo" if you want it... Quote Link to comment
+Couparangus Posted January 4, 2007 Author Share Posted January 4, 2007 Maybe we can get a question from someone whom hasn't yet posted one? My spidy senses tell me there are some lurkers here! Quote Link to comment
+H.F.Reign Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 I think it's sad that this thread has been sitting quiet for a bit so I will throw out a question...to be honest I don't even know the answer (yet) How much of the trans canada trail is now complete? (in km or m please)? as an aside, for the past few years we have been buying a metre of trail as "welcome baby gifts" for those new parents who are close to us. Quote Link to comment
CharlieZulu Posted January 6, 2007 Share Posted January 6, 2007 I think it's sad that this thread has been sitting quiet for a bit so I will throw out a question...to be honest I don't even know the answer (yet) How much of the trans canada trail is now complete? (in km or m please)? as an aside, for the past few years we have been buying a metre of trail as "welcome baby gifts" for those new parents who are close to us. OK, I'll go...... 2000km? Quote Link to comment
+northernpenguin Posted January 7, 2007 Share Posted January 7, 2007 I think it's sad that this thread has been sitting quiet for a bit so I will throw out a question...to be honest I don't even know the answer (yet) How much of the trans canada trail is now complete? (in km or m please)? as an aside, for the past few years we have been buying a metre of trail as "welcome baby gifts" for those new parents who are close to us. One dart, coming right up: 9973 km Quote Link to comment
+Couparangus Posted January 8, 2007 Author Share Posted January 8, 2007 How about 5,000km? Maybe someone should research this and give some "higher!" or "Lower!" direction. Quote Link to comment
+H.F.Reign Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 well, I have looked on the web site to no avail and I have already sent an email out to the folks who proposition us for money. I will wait another day or so as people are getting back from holidays and then will place a call. unless someone knows the current answer! Quote Link to comment
+H.F.Reign Posted January 8, 2007 Share Posted January 8, 2007 (edited) but um, a lot of it is complete and the total distance (last I looked) was to be 17 244km Edited January 8, 2007 by H.F.Reign Quote Link to comment
+ElectroQTed Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 but um, a lot of it is complete and the total distance (last I looked) was to be 17 244km Hmmm, that doesn't quite jive with the info on the Trans Canada Trail website. Maybe they've got old info. Quote Link to comment
danoshimano Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 How about 5,000km? Maybe someone should research this and give some "higher!" or "Lower!" direction. Higher Quote Link to comment
danoshimano Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 (edited) One dart, coming right up: 9973 km Lower Edit: Or... Edited January 9, 2007 by danoshimano Quote Link to comment
+shearzone Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 but um, a lot of it is complete and the total distance (last I looked) was to be 17 244km you asked a question without knowing the answer ? How would we know who's right ? Not specific to this question, but has anyone else playing this game noticed that there have been many 'guess the number of jellybeans in the jar'-type questions recenlty? Don't get me wrong, I don't mind that type of question once in a while, but I liked this game better when an answer can be given without blindly throwing darts and hoping to be the closest. If this is what the game has evolved into, it's become old to me. (end rant) Quote Link to comment
+2happy2gether Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 (edited) 9916.46 km? From http://www.planetranger.com/transcanada/ Edited January 9, 2007 by 2happy2gether Quote Link to comment
+H.F.Reign Posted January 9, 2007 Share Posted January 9, 2007 Giving it to 2happy2gether as he is closest to the most popular answer I have. It is hard to find an "official" answer for this question so I had contacted the transcanada trail people to get the latest "official" figure, which is not always the same as the latest posted figure. As far as throwing darts is concerned, who knows what odd bits of trivia etc people "out there" collect. Those of us bopping in and out don't always realize the big picture. Apologies. anyhow, on to you 2happy2gether!! Quote Link to comment
+2happy2gether Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 Since winter is now upon us - in Simcoe County anyways - and most of us will no doubt be out caching in the cold, I thought that a cold weather question would be a good, educational approach to this topic. This is a two parter: First part: what are 5 of the major symptoms of hypothermia? Second part: what causes most hypothermic deaths? And as a bonus, for anyone who has winter/arctic survival training, what extra measures should you be taking when physically exerting yourself in the cold? Ok, I guess that was 3 parts. Good luck. Quote Link to comment
+Geofellas Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 This thread has now passed the 15,000 views mark Quote Link to comment
+huskerrich2000 Posted January 10, 2007 Share Posted January 10, 2007 ok, let me see part one # shivering; # numbness; # impaired vision; # slow, weak and/or irregular pulse; # slower, shallower breathing; part two I would say exposure. part three ( prevention) layer your clothing avoid getting wet, especially your head (includes sweating) this should at least get us started huskerrich Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.