+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Anyhoooo Double Peak hike on Saturday: Whoever wants to go meet us at Discovery Lake at 8AM. Well, I found the flaw in relying on uploading photos to GC.com - the resizing!! Here's a nice topo GE overlay of the area, which got shrunk when I uploaded it! Quote Link to comment
Tinfoil Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Hi TrailGators! Looks like we're both 99.9 percent good to go on Saturday. WooHoo! Would you happen to have an estimate to the length of time this will take round trip? Tinfoil Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 (edited) Anyhoooo Double Peak hike on Saturday: Whoever wants to go meet us at Discovery Lake at 8AM. Well, I found the flaw in relying on uploading photos to GC.com - the resizing!! Here's a nice topo GE overlay of the area, which got shrunk when I uploaded it! There is no flaw. GC.com will leave your original picture size alone if the file size is less than 125 KB. If it is a larger file size, it will shrink the picture down to 600 pixels wide and often mess it up in the process. If you want them to come out large and better looking, do all of the resizing/compression off line to get the file size below 125 KB and them upload them. Here is an example of a large one I uploaded: Shot of San G Edited December 8, 2005 by RocketMan Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Anyhoooo Double Peak hike on Saturday: Whoever wants to go meet us at Discovery Lake at 8AM. Well, I found the flaw in relying on uploading photos to GC.com - the resizing!! Here's a nice topo GE overlay of the area, which got shrunk when I uploaded it! Here's a piece of the topo I used as the overlay: And a slice of the overlay in GE: Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 (edited) Anyhoooo Double Peak hike on Saturday: Whoever wants to go meet us at Discovery Lake at 8AM. Well, I found the flaw in relying on uploading photos to GC.com - the resizing!! Here's a nice topo GE overlay of the area, which got shrunk when I uploaded it! There is no flaw. GC.com will leave your original picture size alone if the file size is less than 125 KB. If it is a larger file size, it will shrink the picture down to 600 pixels wide and often mess it up in the process. If you want them to come out large and better looking, do all of the resizing/compression off line to get the file size below 125 KB and them upload them. Here is an example of a large one I uploaded: Shot of San G BTW: If you have Photoshop, the Save For Web option on the File menu is the best way I have found to resize the photos. I set the JPEG compression to about 50% and then start lowering the width (keeping a constant aspect ratio) untill the displayed file size is less than 125KB. The Save For Web option is nice because it displays what the final file size will be without actually having to save it first. Edited December 8, 2005 by RocketMan Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 There is now flaw. GC.com will leave your original picture size alone if the file size is less than 125 KB. If it is a larger file size, it will shrink the picture down to 600 pixels wide and often mess it up in the process. If you want them to come out large and better looking, do all of the resizing/compression off line to get the file size below 125 KB and them upload them. That's what I thought, but the original image is only 118KB - so it seems that there's some correlation to the actual compression used in the jpg as well. I can email you the image and you'll see what I mean. Because of all the detail in the topo and GE images, I had to compress it to 75% to get it under 120KB. GC.com must be checking the image size uncompressed or something. Most of the images I've uploaded I compress to about 20% to get them under 120KB. Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 (edited) There is now flaw. GC.com will leave your original picture size alone if the file size is less than 125 KB. If it is a larger file size, it will shrink the picture down to 600 pixels wide and often mess it up in the process. If you want them to come out large and better looking, do all of the resizing/compression off line to get the file size below 125 KB and them upload them. That's what I thought, but the original image is only 118KB - so it seems that there's some correlation to the actual compression used in the jpg as well. I can email you the image and you'll see what I mean. Because of all the detail in the topo and GE images, I had to compress it to 75% to get it under 120KB. GC.com must be checking the image size uncompressed or something. Most of the images I've uploaded I compress to about 20% to get them under 120KB. That sounds strange. I have never seen GC.com do any tweaking to my photos that are under 125K no matter what I set the compression to. That would be good if you could send me the file that you are uploading so I can give it a shot. Please send it to igeocache@gmail.com. Where are you uploading the image to (Your Profile or a Cache Log). It used to be that you could only load images under 100K and there was no resizing. After Jeremy added the resizing for larger images, things were initially messed up where images uploaded to cache pages all got resized and ones on cache logs only got resized if over 125K. I wonder if something is messed up again. Edit: I did a quick search. Here is where I brought up the cache page resizing problem and here is where I describe the resizing method (this was from when the limit was still 100K). Edited December 8, 2005 by RocketMan Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Where are you uploading the image to (Your Profile or a Cache Log). It used to be that you could only load images under 100K and there was no resizing. After Jeremy added the resizing for larger images, things were initially messed up where images uploaded to cache pages all got resized and ones on cache logs only got resized if over 125K. I wonder if something is messed up again. I just emailed it to you - I've been uploading them to my cache itself - not a log or my profile. This is the first time I've had this happen as well. Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Where are you uploading the image to (Your Profile or a Cache Log). It used to be that you could only load images under 100K and there was no resizing. After Jeremy added the resizing for larger images, things were initially messed up where images uploaded to cache pages all got resized and ones on cache logs only got resized if over 125K. I wonder if something is messed up again. I just emailed it to you - I've been uploading them to my cache itself - not a log or my profile. This is the first time I've had this happen as well. Wow, it did the same thing to me when I uploaded it to the cache page and to the a log. Here is the image you sent me (uploaded somewhere else): and here is how GC changes it: Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Edit: I did a quick search. Here is where I brought up the cache page resizing problem and here is where I describe the resizing method (this was from when the limit was still 100K). Ahh, it looks like I've stumbled into an old bug somehow?! Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Hi TrailGators! Looks like we're both 99.9 percent good to go on Saturday. WooHoo! Would you happen to have an estimate to the length of time this will take round trip? Tinfoil Good to hear! Not sure but I would guess about 3 hours or so... Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Wow, it did the same thing to me when I uploaded it to the cache page and to the a log. Here is the image you sent me (uploaded somewhere else): Thanks for uploading it elsewhere! So it doesn't work on a log either - strange. Maybe there's an upper limit on the width (mine is 1075 vs yours 1000) and height that is undocumented. Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 (edited) Wow, it did the same thing to me when I uploaded it to the cache page and to the a log. Here is the image you sent me (uploaded somewhere else): Thanks for uploading it elsewhere! So it doesn't work on a log either - strange. Maybe there's an upper limit on the width (mine is 1075 vs yours 1000) and height that is undocumented. Something is strange with the way that the file size is reduced on your image. When I open it in Photoshop and do a Save For Web, it shows your same 70% compression that you have used and the same dimensions, but it says the resulting file size will be 176.6 KB which would cause resizing when uploaded. Edit: I did a couple of tests and it is the compression factor that is causing the resizing. The 70% compression on the Save For Web image above is actually 70% uncompressed. If I save the file with that number at 25% to get the equivalent 75% compression that you used and then upload the image, GC.com resizes it. There must be some limit on compression that GC.com allows. I learned something new. I always use 50% or less compression and it works fine. Crap, it's getting late. I'm going to bed. Night all. Edited December 8, 2005 by RocketMan Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 Something is strange with the way that the file size is reduced on your image. When I open it in Photoshop and do a Save For Web, it shows your same 70% compression that you have used and the same dimensions, but it says the resulting file size will be 176.6 KB which would cause resizing when uploaded. Got me! Mine looks like this: I'll play around and maybe figure out what the limits are using my software (Corel PHOTO PAINT). I'll probably continue this on the Banter thread once I have a better idea! Thanks again for getting the full sized version to show up here! Quote Link to comment
Tinfoil Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Hi TrailGators! Looks like we're both 99.9 percent good to go on Saturday. WooHoo! Would you happen to have an estimate to the length of time this will take round trip? Tinfoil Good to hear! Not sure but I would guess about 3 hours or so... Sounds good! Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Something is strange with the way that the file size is reduced on your image. When I open it in Photoshop and do a Save For Web, it shows your same 70% compression that you have used and the same dimensions, but it says the resulting file size will be 176.6 KB which would cause resizing when uploaded. Got me! Mine looks like this: I'll play around and maybe figure out what the limits are using my software (Corel PHOTO PAINT). I'll probably continue this on the Banter thread once I have a better idea! Thanks again for getting the full sized version to show up here! After sleeping on it and thinking about it this morning, I think that maybe there is a bug in the GC.com image handling routine. I will post something in the main forums later today and see what TPTB have to say about it. RM Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Good to hear! Not sure but I would guess about 3 hours or so... What are we going to do for the rest of the day? It looks like I am in the minority of needing to get the multi at the lake... Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 8, 2005 Author Share Posted December 8, 2005 It looks like I am in the minority of needing to get the multi at the lake... I need any/all caches in that area The rest of the day... I'll probably be in intensive care! Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Good to hear! Not sure but I would guess about 3 hours or so... What are we going to do for the rest of the day? It looks like I am in the minority of needing to get the multi at the lake... Why don't we all do Compromising Positions! There are a bunch in the area..... Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Why don't we all do Compromising Positions! that one is on my ignore list. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Why don't we all do Compromising Positions! that one is on my ignore list. Here my unfounds in that area.... Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Why don't we all do Compromising Positions! that one is on my ignore list. Here my unfounds in that area.... I actually have one there that you don't. Guess I should start looking at the area since I was originally thinking the area was much closer to the 5. I didn't know it was that close to the 15. Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 FYI, you can drive up a paved road to the icon at the bottom of this photo - that's the end of the pavement - a dirt road continues NE beyond that (with no gates) but I didn't have time to see where it went. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) FYI, you can drive up a paved road to the icon at the bottom of this photo - that's the end of the pavement - a dirt road continues NE beyond that (with no gates) but I didn't have time to see where it went. [snip] I figured we'd hit "On the Road to Double Peak" on the way up from Discovery Lake. That way we'd be doing the hike the way Tuna laid out back in early 2001. I thought it would be cool to do it that way! Why not add some nostalgia! As it turns this hike should be easier (800 feet up) than Iron Mountain (1000 feet). I didn't think Iron Mountain was too bad (at my easy pace)! Also there is a parking lot at Discovery Lake that which is a better spot for the 6-7 vehicles that are showing up..... It is interesting to note that the Double Peak cache is almost five years old (as of 1/13/06)! It is the oldest active cache in San Diego! Edited December 9, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 I figured we'd hit "On the Road to Double Peak" on the way up from Discovery Lake. That way we'd be doing the hike the way Tuna laid out back in early 2001. I thought it would be cool to do it that way! Why not add some nostalgia! As it turns this hike should be easier (800 feet up) than Iron Mountain (1000 feet). I didn't think Iron Mountain was too bad (at my easy pace)! Also there is a parking lot at Discovery Lake that which is a better spot for the 6-7 vehicles that are showing up..... I'm all for nostalgia! I happened to be on the ugly side of the mountain and was checking it out - UGLY!! Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) I just did an estimate of the distance from my house to the trailhead for the "TrailGators 1000th-Cache Event" and it is more than 50 miles from my house . . . Does anyone who is driving up live in the Rancho San Diego/La Mesa/El Cajon/Santee/Lakeside area? Although, I'm not sure I can get up early enough to make it to the 8:00 start time even if there is someone to carpool with . . . Edit . . . oops Edited December 9, 2005 by Miragee Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I just did an estimate of the distance from my house to the trailhead for the "TrailGators 100th-Cache Event" and it is more than 50 miles from my house . . . Does anyone who is driving up live in the Rancho San Diego/La Mesa/El Cajon/Santee/Lakeside area? Although, I'm not sure I can get up early enough to make it to the 8:00 start time even if there is someone to carpool with . . . I will probably be coming south to Poway Road since it is an easier road to drive when I am half asleep. I can pick you up on either freeway (67 or 15) of it if you can't find anyone farther south. (will only save you the last few miles though) Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 What time will you be at Poway Road and 67? By the way, P.T. and I got caught in the traffic jam from that location south last evening because of the fatal accident that occurred at Slaughterhouse Canyon Rd. and 67. It took us 45 minutes to cover that distance. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) I just did an estimate of the distance from my house to the trailhead for the "TrailGators 100th-Cache Event" and it is more than 50 miles from my house . . . I had my 100th cache event over a year and half ago.... Hey Miragee, I drove all the way down to your neck of the woods the last two weeks and I was driving my gas guzzler truck! Edited December 9, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 Hey Miragee, I drove all the way down to your neck of the woods the last two weeks and I was driving my gas guzzler truck! And didn't we even meet at 7am for one of them?!?! Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I had my 100th cache event over a year and half ago.... Hey Miragee, I drove all the way down to your neck of the woods the last two weeks and I was driving my gas guzzler truck! Sorry about that. Of course I meant 1000th-Cache Event! I won't go into details, but I think you can afford the gas more than I can . . . Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 OK slight change of course...I couldn't resist going after John&Jess's new puzzle cache in Escondido tonight. So we are going to skip GCMRY0 on the way up and hit it on the way back because I only need 3 more caches now!!! So we'll hit GC81B, GCMMCQ and then.....GC140! This saves us a little extra walking too! Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) I won't go into details, but . . . I was only joking! Edited December 9, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 What time will you be at Poway Road and 67? By the way, P.T. and I got caught in the traffic jam from that location south last evening because of the fatal accident that occurred at Slaughterhouse Canyon Rd. and 67. It took us 45 minutes to cover that distance. I was thinking about 7:20am since I figure it would take about a half hour to get there. I would recommend a good jacket since I don't have a heater. Rogue got caught going south in that accident on the way to class. Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I was just reminiscing about my trip up Double Peak with fkrexcal over 3 years ago. We met MissMarbles for the first time on that trip. Anyone heard from her lately? Here are a few pics: fkrexcal, RM, MissMarbles and Her Son fkrexcal on the Trail A Skinny RM holding a Travel Bug Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) I was just reminiscing about my trip up Double Peak with fkrexcal over 3 years ago. We met MissMarbles for the first time on that trip. Anyone heard from her lately? [snip] I noticed that you took the Andy Griffith CD. Isn't that still one of your favs? But seriously thanks for posting the photos! Saturday should be fun! Edited December 9, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+RocketMan Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I was just reminiscing about my trip up Double Peak with fkrexcal over 3 years ago. We met MissMarbles for the first time on that trip. Anyone heard from her lately? [snip] I noticed that you took the Andy Griffith CD. Isn't that still one of your favs? But seriously thanks for posting the photos! Saturday should be fun! I thought it might be cool, but it sucked! Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 I was just reminiscing about my trip up Double Peak with fkrexcal over 3 years ago. We met MissMarbles for the first time on that trip. Anyone heard from her lately? [snip] I noticed that you took the Andy Griffith CD. Isn't that still one of your favs? But seriously thanks for posting the photos! Saturday should be fun! I thought it might be cool, but it sucked! No Gomer or Goober songs? Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 OK slight change of course...I couldn't resist going after John&Jess's new puzzle cache in Escondido tonight. I finally figured that one out tonight so I will need to swing by on Saturday if I get a chance. Still hitting myself in the head for making that one harder than it should have been. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 (edited) OK slight change of course...I couldn't resist going after John&Jess's new puzzle cache in Escondido tonight. I finally figured that one out tonight so I will need to swing by on Saturday if I get a chance. Still hitting myself in the head for making that one harder than it should have been. It's an easy one to grab! Edited December 9, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+Toby's Gang Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Is there still a group meeting at Discovery Lake tomorrow morning at 8? Can you use one more person? Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 (edited) Is there still a group meeting at Discovery Lake tomorrow morning at 8? Can you use one more person? Yes we are! The more the merrier! These are the geocachers and geodogs that said they are coming (so far): Tinfoil and Wall-Eyed Nutbag, Duganrm and Kaida, Miragee, Ahimsa, Jess and Becca, Toby's Gang and me. Hopefully, I didn't inadvertantly leave out somebody or somebody's dog....... Edited December 10, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Is there still a group meeting at Discovery Lake tomorrow morning at 8? Can you use one more person? Yes we are! The more the merrier! These are the geocachers and geodogs that said they are coming (so far): Tinfoil and Wall-Eyed Nutbag, Duganrm and Kaida, Miragee, Ahimsa, Jess and Becca, Toby's Gang and me. Hopefully, I didn't inadvertantly leave out somebody or somebody's dog....... at this point it looks like Miragee won't make it. She let me know so I don't sit at Poway Road waiting for her. Quote Link to comment
+fisnjack Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Looks like I will be be attempting to find you guys as well. Finally got the query to run so I now have the caches. Is it best to approach from Escondido or Oceanside? Comming from the border I have a choice. Jack Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Looks like I will be be attempting to find you guys as well. Finally got the query to run so I now have the caches. Is it best to approach from Escondido or Oceanside? Comming from the border I have a choice. Jack Good to hear! Either way but it's closer to 15.... Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Looks like I will be be attempting to find you guys as well. Finally got the query to run so I now have the caches. Is it best to approach from Escondido or Oceanside? Comming from the border I have a choice. Jack Escondido. Take the 15 to the 78. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 10, 2005 Share Posted December 10, 2005 Looks like I will be be attempting to find you guys as well. Finally got the query to run so I now have the caches. Is it best to approach from Escondido or Oceanside? Comming from the border I have a choice. Jack Escondido. Take the 15 to the 78. ...to Twin Oaks(s) to Craven(w) to Foxhall(s)....say don't we all have GPSs? Quote Link to comment
+TFTC Posted December 10, 2005 Author Share Posted December 10, 2005 But did they sign the log?!? Quote Link to comment
+duganrm Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 Somone from out of town posted a note on The Forbidden Forrest. Figured it would get it a litte more attention if I posted it here. I noticed that a lot of folks are watching this cache, so I decided to post an invitation. A friend and I will be trying for this cache on Monday, December 12, in the evening (time not set yet). Drop me an email if you are interested in joining us. FYI - My friend has completed this cache before, I have not. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted December 11, 2005 Share Posted December 11, 2005 (edited) But did they sign the log?!? No but Becca licked me right on the mouth when I was signing the log! Edited December 11, 2005 by TrailGators Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.