+Ozarktroutbum Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 107 When GPSr's are outlawed, only Outlaws will have GPSr's. Quote
+Marky Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 1751 is the count for the 100 mile radius from home (zip 95118). 1954 is the count from work (zip 94588). --Marky "All of us get lost in the darkness, dreamers learn to steer with a backlit GPSr" Quote
+maleki Posted February 14, 2003 Author Posted February 14, 2003 Now I understand why website is basically under siege. WoW! Seems way too many new caches introduced just in the last few months(many questionable caches IMO). Easy to see why the sytem administrators, approvers, and the website itself is overloaded. Perhaps time to limit new caches in some way in certain areas? I see users placing new caches and not maintaining ones placed previously. Quality not quantity!!!! NO MORE DRIVE UP CACHES!!!!!!!! Quote
+Jeepster Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 Washington, Illinois 61571 329 caches ... but, you'll not hear me complain. Last summer we found that North Dakota had less then 20 caches ... and that's for the whole state. Jeepster - We did not inherit the land from our parents; we are borrowing it from our children. Quote
+SherwoodForest Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 365 as of today... september 2002 was probably around 300, i think... of course, more than half of that is at the 100 mile distance (north side of columbus, east side of toledo, southeast side of detroit, northwest side of the 'Burgh, and southeast side of Erie Cache well, and see ya round the bend... Quote
+texcaver Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 Ok, 79414, Lubbock Tx. 36 But I'll Help that a little soon. The next two on my list, are 48, and 59 miles away, and not in the same direction. After that, the next "real" caches, are at least 75 miles away. Quote
mortonfox Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 1408... so I'm still about 100 finds behind my 100-mile radius, after all these months. Quote
+sherk Posted February 14, 2003 Posted February 14, 2003 1187 in 92107 My radius is half ocean but I plan to fill it with moving sea lion and buoy caches so I can get the numbers up. Quote
+Scout Master Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 814 Northern Utah I have heard it is the Highest PER CAPATA in the nation Scout Master Quote
cheese Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 400. ok so it isn't that big, but it's still getting off the ground around here. "There are two different kinds of people in this world: those who finish what they start, and" - Brad Ramsey Quote
+bigeddy Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 quote:Originally posted by maleki:Quality not quantity!!!! NO MORE DRIVE UP CACHES!!!!!!!! Quality, yes, but don't confuse difficulty with quality. Drive-up caches have their place. As far as quantity goes in Central Oregon: In Sept. 2001, 25 caches in 50-mi radius. Today, 241 caches in 50-mi radius; 448 in 100-mi radius. That last number is explained by the fact that east of here the population density is less than a person per square mile in many places, and west of here is the Cascades. If I lived in Winnemucca, Nevada there would be 27 caches in a 100-mi radius. Quote
+Treasure Hunters Inc. Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 At present time 341 around 43025 $1000 Bill geocaching is living in a 30 foot circle Quote
+GeoSharks Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 2,016 within 100 miles. 494 within 50 miles. Quote
+geoark1 Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 72023 has at present 94 within 100 Miles a year ago we had approx 25. Things are looking up. Team GEOARK1 Searching for the next CACHE Quote
The Face Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 Zip code 54304- 298 caches' a THIRD across Lake Michigan!(300 mi les away) Quote
+Team Boogidy Posted February 15, 2003 Posted February 15, 2003 On Sept 14 ,2002 it was 856. Today it is 1330. We've been busy in 93063! ...Running over the same old ground, what have we found?... Quote
+MaxEntropy Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 I'm so fortunate to have 1902 within 100 miles of 94560. There would be more, but the San Francisco Bay and a big chunk of the Pacific Ocean are within 100 miles. I remember it being 1109 on September 11th the last time that this question was asked. That means that the cache count nearly doubled in five months! Mickey Max Entropy More than just a name, a lifestyle. Quote
+PDOP's Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 28 in total of which 3 are mine. Still have to find 11 of these Quote
95yj Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 615 as of this morning. If they keep turning rural America into suburbia around here, we won't have anyplace to hide them! Seems it was a better place to live when most of the residents walked on four legs instead of two. Dennis "The Menace" Mitchell Quote
+smillersmiller Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 Wow, I'm absolutely amazed at the figures represented here. I see 168 within 100 miles of 50265 (West Des Moines, IA), but I see 25 caches within 10 miles. I could hit the road on my bike and visit 10 caches in an afternoon. A search from a more "remote" part of Iowa (from a Geocaching point of view at least) - Cumberland, IA 50843 - produces 243 caches within 100 miles, but zero within 10 miles and only one within 25 miles. (I'm assuming everyone is including the disabled caches that show up in the searches.) ICQ: 5563417 Quote
+Beagle Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 734 within 100 miles of 60119, Beautiful Cozy Elburn, Illinois! Quote
+Frolickin Posted February 16, 2003 Posted February 16, 2003 Not bad considering I can't go too far east or south b4 I hit the ocean. Fro. ________________________________________ Geocaching . . . hiking with a purpose Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.