+Eckington Posted May 7, 2005 Share Posted May 7, 2005 No, I am afraid not . Refusal of permission to place a cache would not automatically result in a virtual being allowable. We would still have to follow the, now very tight , guidelines for virts which are set out by gc.com. However, as has been suggested elsewhere, perhaps there is a wind of change blowing through Groundspeak as far as a possible way to list virts is concerned............ Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.