Strange!

[+Learned Gerbil]

Just had a mail for a cache that has been published (Plot) - but clicking on the cache link in the mail produces a blank "form" - laid out like a cache page, but no cache details. Clicking on the link to the log entry, I get a message that says I can't see logs in unapproved caches! What is going on?

[+Eckington]

I hit "GO" by mistake and immediately un-approved it and put it on hold for further information much sorrow

[+Moote]

I hit "GO" by mistake and immediately un-approved it and put it on hold for further information much sorrow

So will you add clumsy to the next description of yourself which you put out in these forums

 

Milton (aka moote)

[+kbootb]

I hit "GO" by mistake and immediately un-approved it and put it on hold for further information much sorrow

That'll be the red wine then?

[markandlynn]

Can you answer why i have this cache GCM1AY in my gsak database as well then please mr approver while your explaining things. TA

edit to remove comment as it seems to of caused inadvertent offence

Edited October 4, 2005 by markandlynn

[+Learned Gerbil]

Yellow text is impossible to read.

[+Learned Gerbil]

I hit "GO" by mistake and immediately un-approved it and put it on hold for further information much sorrow

I guessed it was something like that - just surprised I don't get a mail to tell me!

[+littlejim]

I hit "GO" by mistake

Buy the man a pint - he seems to be working night (and probably early morning) shift as well as the day job

[+Eckington]

ENOUGH! I'm going to bed

[+The Cache Hoppers]

Sheesh! I rinsed my contact lenses for that yellow print and still couldn't see it! Liane

[+Us 4 and Jess]

it says mr drunk

[+Bill D (wwh)]

The Cache Hoppers wrote:

I rinsed my contact lenses for that yellow print and still couldn't see it!

To read yellow text on a white background (or other unreadable colour combinations) just highlight the text with the cursor.

[+Eckington]

it says mr drunk

I was as jober as a sudge

[+Learned Gerbil]

The Cache Hoppers wrote:

I rinsed my contact lenses for that yellow print and still couldn't see it!

To read yellow text on a white background (or other unreadable colour combinations) just highlight the text with the cursor.

So what exactly is the point?

[+mongoose39uk]

The Cache Hoppers wrote:

I rinsed my contact lenses for that yellow print and still couldn't see it!

To read yellow text on a white background (or other unreadable colour combinations) just highlight the text with the cursor.

So what exactly is the point?

It's called fun

[markandlynn]

Sheesh i couldn't find the strikethrough button.

The question about the cache is valid though as i have it in a GPX file despite it not being approved ????

[Deego]

There isnt a strikethrough button

Edited October 4, 2005 by Deego

[markandlynn]

There isnt a strikethrough button

Ahh thats how you do it you can see it if you quote it

[+steviep]

There isnt a strikethrough button

Ahh thats how you do it you can see it if you quote it

I learn something every day thanks!

[+Eckington]

Sheesh i couldn't find the strikethrough button.

The question about the cache is valid though as i have it in a GPX file despite it not being approved ????

I have already appologised for my error, the cache was in fact approved, for about 20 seconds, the time it took me to realise my error, change page views and unapprove it. What gc.com magic happened in those few seconds I do not know and I am afraid I cannot control. Again I offer my appologies for the inconvenience and concern my error has caused.

 

Eckington

[markandlynn]

Again I offer my appologies for the inconvenience and concern my error has caused.

 

Eckington

No need to appologise sorry i thought my link was to a completely different cache didn't realise they were the same cache

[+Eckington]

Again I offer my appologies for the inconvenience and concern my error has caused.

 

Eckington

No need to appologise sorry i thought my link was to a completely different cache didn't realise they were the same cache

Ah!

 

I have just scrolled up the page and found your original post . Its strange, you can follow the link and see the archived cache, yet if you go through "Hide and Seek" you get to the "This cache is archived" error message.

 

All I can think of is that the original setter submitted it for review and then archived it, a permission issue, before it got looked at by Lactodorum or myself. This combination of circumstances making it visible in some places and not in others.......