+Castle Mischief Posted September 29, 2010 Share Posted September 29, 2010 Brian is looking for Nirvana with a window seat and in-flight meals and your method will never appeal to him because from his point of view the first step is a loss and any further steps to regain those losses is too time consuming. Nah, I'm just looking for a way to eliminate those caches placed just for the sake of numbers and without regard to aesthetics, without eliminating hundreds, or thousands of fine caches in the process. But since it is only your opinion that this is the reason for placing those caches, you are still heading at the problem from the wrong direction. Once you come to grips with the fact that you aren't a mind reader, perhaps you will come to the realization that the 'problem' lies within you, not other cachers and then embrace a system that is based on your preferences, not your guesses at the motivations of all other cachers. Until then, too bad so sad that you won't have fun finding those caches that you could have easily and peasily sorted out. (That and the fact that you continue to argue against the easy peasy method as if it started and ended at the first step. Of course, you don't actually believe this because the method has been explained directly to you so many times, but it sure does make it easier to argue against that way, doesn't it?) But give him this- he's asking for a descriptive icon that would give the hiders an opportunity to broadcast the intentions of their cache. If the CO is saying "just for the numbers, yo" then there's no mind reading required. The fact that you try to argue for the easy peasy with somebody that has such an ideological disconnect with your logic is... illogical. Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.