BRTango Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I just saw that Apple has released a version of Safari for Windows. I'm planning on checking it out when I get home tonight. In the meantime I was wondering if anyone else had already checked it out? How does GC.com work with it? Link to comment
+admo1972 Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I tried it briefly last night (I use a mac, but tried Safari in XP both in Parallels and Boot Camp). Seems fine. Link to comment
+SmartSapper Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Never heard of it, what's it do? Link to comment
BRTango Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 Never heard of it, what's it do? It's a web browser for the MAC. Apple just released a windows version. Supposed to be much faster than IE and Firefox. Now that I think about it, I probably should have posted this to the website forum. If a mod could slip this over that way, I'd appreciate it. Link to comment
+Stunod Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Now that I think about it, I probably should have posted this to the website forum. If a mod could slip this over that way, I'd appreciate it. Moving per request... Link to comment
+Miragee Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Sounds interesting, but I use the Opera browser, which is much faster than either IE or Firefox, so I don't think I'll need to check it out. Link to comment
BRTango Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 (edited) Sounds interesting, but I use the Opera browser, which is much faster than either IE or Firefox, so I don't think I'll need to check it out. I never had much luck with Opera... although I haven't tried it in a couple of years. It always seemed to have problems with many of the web pages I'd visit. Edited June 12, 2007 by BRTango Link to comment
+Miragee Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I've been using it for almost six years now and it works for the pages I visit . . . however, there are sites that are very poorly-coded and Opera is less-tolerant of those . . . Link to comment
BRTango Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 I've been using it for almost six years now and it works for the pages I visit . . . however, there are sites that are very poorly-coded and Opera is less-tolerant of those . . . It doesn't (well... didn't in the past) seem to work well with my online banking, so I dropped it pretty quick. Anyway... I'm curious about Safari, think I'll give it a try this evening. Maybe I'll pull the latest Opera as well. Link to comment
+carleenp Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 (edited) I never cared for Safari much on my Mac and used Firefox instead. Although Safari claimed to be faster, I found that Firefox worked better. I haven't tried in on my PC. Edited June 12, 2007 by carleenp Link to comment
+Bambography Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I don't use it on the Mac (Firefox rules the roost there) so I can't see me bothering on the PC. Link to comment
+sTeamTraen Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I'd heard that Safari was compatible with the "Acid2 Test" (which sees how compatible a browser is with the standards, notably for drawing things). The test is here: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ It's worth running on your browser. Firefox is pretty bad, IE is hilarious. Safari 3 public beta for Windows crashes Link to comment
+klossner Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 Safari for Windows was cracked on its first day. A security researcher wrote "I now have a fully functional command execution vulnerability, triggered without user interaction simply by visiting a website." Apple excels in a lot of area, but they have no experience writing safe code for the security hellhole that is Windows. Link to comment
BRTango Posted June 12, 2007 Author Share Posted June 12, 2007 I'd heard that Safari was compatible with the "Acid2 Test" (which sees how compatible a browser is with the standards, notably for drawing things). The test is here: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ It's worth running on your browser. Firefox is pretty bad, IE is hilarious. Safari 3 public beta for Windows crashes Hmmm... maybe I'll wait a bit before giving it a go. Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted June 12, 2007 Share Posted June 12, 2007 I'd heard that Safari was compatible with the "Acid2 Test" (which sees how compatible a browser is with the standards, notably for drawing things). The test is here: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ It's worth running on your browser. Firefox is pretty bad, IE is hilarious. Safari 3 public beta for Windows crashes The current Firefox nightly builds pass Acid2, as will the upcoming Firefox 3. Link to comment
+benh57 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Safari for Windows was cracked on its first day. A security researcher wrote "I now have a fully functional command execution vulnerability, triggered without user interaction simply by visiting a website." Apple excels in a lot of area, but they have no experience writing safe code for the security hellhole that is Windows. Sure they do, quicktime and itunes have been on windows for years. It's a beta. There will be bugs. U sing a beta web browser is not a good idea unless you know what you are doing. Link to comment
+The Bolas Heathens Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I use Safari all the time on my Mac (don't like Firefox as it's too slow and just does not look right) so tried it on Windows. Looks to be good apart from the GPX download from a cache page seems to be broken and ends up trying ot download the underlying .aspx page that generates the GPX file. Safari 2 passes the Acid 2 test on my Mac with no problems at all. Just off to try it with Safari 3... Link to comment
+The Bolas Heathens Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Just tried it Safari 3 on XP and it's spot on - does not crash and displays the image correctly. I'd heard that Safari was compatible with the "Acid2 Test" (which sees how compatible a browser is with the standards, notably for drawing things). The test is here: http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/ It's worth running on your browser. Firefox is pretty bad, IE is hilarious. Safari 3 public beta for Windows crashes Link to comment
+flask Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 i wouldn't bother with safari for windows, since i don't bother with windows. there is one little issue with regual safari, though: on my machine, at least, the Groundspeak forums (and only the Groundspeak forums) crash my browswer. it's a pain. Link to comment
+Nero Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I'm using a mac, but I've been using Firefox for months because safari was really unstable and would just quit for no reason, frequently. Apple just released Safari V3, its a beta and I'm back using safari and so far no problems (on my mac), it passed that acid test just fine, and seems stable. Link to comment
Edgemaster Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Of course Safari will pass the acid test, it's built off the Linux KHTML rendering engine, that successfully passed it first. I would never use Safari for regular browsing, merely testing web design. I hate the brushed metal interface, it just doesn't work on Windows. Link to comment
+The Cheeseheads Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Safari for Windows was cracked on its first day. A security researcher wrote "I now have a fully functional command execution vulnerability, triggered without user interaction simply by visiting a website." Apple excels in a lot of area, but they have no experience writing safe code for the security hellhole that is Windows. There's an updated version out to fix all that. That said, I'm not really sure what Apple's going after. I think that most people who want to shun IE are probably using either Firefox or Opera. Probably the only people who will use Safari are Mac users who also use PCs. Personally, I use Webkit on the Mac and Firefox on Windows. Link to comment
+admo1972 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 That said, I'm not really sure what Apple's going after. Probably going to use Safari for iPhone syncing. Link to comment
+QuesterMark Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Sounds interesting, but I use the Opera browser, which is much faster than either IE or Firefox, so I don't think I'll need to check it out. I just have to comment because my personality is different than yours. I primarily use Firefox with some AddOns. But I downloaded Safari just so I could see how it works! I still primarily use Firefox. I have Opera installed too, and try it for some pages sometimes. I have Opera Mini on my phone. Anyway...Safari is still definitely beta. Try it if you want...but don't make it your default or even preferred just yet. Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Tried it out, but can't see why I would drop Firefox for it. There didn't seem to be any support for themes, so you can't get rid of that awful etched metal look. The fonts looked muddy, probably due to Apple deciding not to utilize native ClearType capabilities, and instead using something of their own concoction. The few nice touches it does have, such as being able to resize most textboxes, are also available in Firefox by just adding an extension. Link to comment
+PJPeters Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Sounds interesting, but I use the Opera browser, which is much faster than either IE or Firefox, so I don't think I'll need to check it out. I am an Opera user, as well. Safari blows Opera out of the water rendering pages. It's a lot faster (at least on my dysfunctional machine). I also haven't seen many issues with it, just some minor annoyances: I can't use the extra buttons on my mouse (set for forward and back pages), there's no apparent way to delete buttons from the toolbar, so I'm stuck with the add a link button, etc., and I like Mouse Gestures on Opera. I know it's beta still, so I'll wait until they fix it. Unless I throw the Windoze machine out the real window. As for the GC.com site, it's fine. I haven't seen any issues with it. Granted, I'm starting to phase out of the Winblows machine, and over to the new Mac laptop, so most of this is moot at this point. Link to comment
+W8TTS Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 I've been playing with Safari and it's interesting, and still buggy. Does some strange things that I've reported and hope they fix. Just remember what they've put out is beta. Link to comment
+adventurer17 Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 I've been using Safari from my MAC for a year now. Didn't realize it would be different. Haven't downloaded any waypoints yet. Still waiting for Apple to come up with a TOPO for Mac and a cord to download waypoints. Link to comment
+Miragee Posted June 18, 2007 Share Posted June 18, 2007 Interesting. Wonder why they didn't test Opera? It is faster than either IE or Firefox . . . Since I connect at 24 K, speed, or lack of it, is something I can definitely notice . . . Link to comment
+truenorth Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 heh. i tried the new safari beta for osx on my macbook, and was told that it did not meet the requirements... Link to comment
Recommended Posts