Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
brantport14

Adding a new Benchmark to Geocaching Website

14 posts in this topic

If there is a new benchmark, is that updated accordingly to the Geocaching website? 

Forexample:
 

20171002_122719.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post

No, unfortunately. There was a single data dump in the early 2000's (I'm sure one of the helpful posters here will be more specific) and it has never been updated.

2

Share this post


Link to post

Time for someone at Groundspeak to do some updating, it seems!

0

Share this post


Link to post

Not on their priority list for sure...

0

Share this post


Link to post

Add it to Waymarking  under the Benchmarks category, as one way to document its existence . . .

2

Share this post


Link to post

Hey,

Is the NGS back to using what we were calling the 'Goldie, Oldies' metal?  A thread on that subject here somewhere.  I would suggest that all 'Newbies' go after the ones that are 'OTM' (older than me) rather than keep doing the Sinatra '-silly old ram-------dam....' thing about the 2000 dump.

Traveled north to south a couple weeks ago and again wished that if  I still had downhill knees and and Kings field notes.  Still willing to share my Google Earth .kmz file for his occpied high points.

kayakbird   - presently in Moab, Utah

 

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
10 hours ago, Where's George said:

Add it to Waymarking  under the Benchmarks category, as one way to document its existence . . .

Yes.  I did that once.  As part of the Center of Population series of benchmarks.  I did that in 2008.  It was found once in 2009.  Wow! What great fun!

2

Share this post


Link to post

I have about 20 BM's like that listed on the Waymarking site. It's a good place to share photos and coordinates. 

0

Share this post


Link to post

Well that answered my question. I have found that the data on the geocaching site is often out of date (that is, not reflecting recent reports on the condition of the mark). Is this data never updated? 

0

Share this post


Link to post
1 hour ago, The Snowdog said:

Well that answered my question. I have found that the data on the geocaching site is often out of date (that is, not reflecting recent reports on the condition of the mark). Is this data never updated? 

Yep. Never updated. Back in the early days of Geocaching, you could find all the local caches rather quickly and have nothing else to do but wait for another local cache to be placed in a month or two. Groundspeak did a one-time dump of all the NGS Benchmarks and posted them to give us something to do with our GPS unit. Today, with so many caches to find, there are few who go after Benchmarks because they do not add to your cache count.

0

Share this post


Link to post

You can always go look at the NGS data base for current information.  Find the link for Benchmarks, choose your search method, and pick text, not shapefiles.

https://www.ngs.noaa.gov

I quickly tired of finding (or not) green match holders in conifer trees, and decided that while geocaching occasionally took me to interesting places I wouldn't have noticed, it wasn't otherwise a useful activity. 

Bench mark hunting (once I got a feel for what the professionals were interested in and how they described positions) lets me make a useful contribution by posting recoveries both here and to NGS, is still treasure hunting outdoors, sometimes involves historical research, and teaches me about geodetic science.  I also like playing with some technical toys I acquired for that, including metal detector, magnetic locator, obsolescent theodolite, and now a rather old professional GPS receiver to submit files for GPS on Benchmarks that I've posted about.

1

Share this post


Link to post
14 hours ago, 8Nuts MotherGoose said:

Yep. Never updated. Back in the early days of Geocaching, you could find all the local caches rather quickly and have nothing else to do but wait for another local cache to be placed in a month or two. Groundspeak did a one-time dump of all the NGS Benchmarks and posted them to give us something to do with our GPS unit. Today, with so many caches to find, there are few who go after Benchmarks because they do not add to your cache count.

That's the way I understood it as well (benchmarks simply as a fill-in), and agree for the reason why it's not a priority today.

There's a couple other sites that would like some updating, but with lack of a "find count", they probably won't see much either.  :)

0

Share this post


Link to post

Bill93,

Thank you for your input on this. Geocaching can be fun, but benchmark hunting is much more rewarding. I, too, decided to look for benchmarks instead of caches for the same reasons that you gave. More people should travel that way.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post

Hi All,

Bill touched on 'historical' and a good discussion along those lines is something we have not had here for awhile and I miss them.

I am just about back to Montana after a six week swing (some birding, but mostly kayaking) through a fairly large area where I have bench marked.  Re-did exactly one that I had blundered and NGS recovered as 'Not Found' several years ago.  If you will indulge me I will touch on some of the 'historical' memories that filtered by along with 3000 miles or so:

1]   Fur trapping rendezvous & Ashley's further-est down steam travel on the Green River.

2]  Oregon Trail over the pass discovered by the above gentleman.

3]  Gazed at high points and river valleys that became scientifically known as a result of the four great western surveys in the 1860's & 70's - the result of one being instrumental in the formation of Yellowstone National Park.  And, Yes, I still think that somewhere there is permanent evidence of occupation by 'Kings 40th'!

4]  Had a couple of crossings on a multi-state, multi-year level line that was found to have a sizable blunder when finished.  Started  with chiseled squares in the top of native stone posts and ended with 'modern' brass caps in concrete settings. See Special Publication #18 for the description and location of many of these bench marks.

5]  Was again amazed at the density of vertical control points (1 or more per mile) in portions of central west Mohave County, Arizona; and the enduring quality of the concrete in a couple of no longer used structures associated with those level lines.

6]  Did not travel in either Meagher County, Montana or Albany County, Wyoming, but again wondered why those two areas have several of the short lived depression area "& State Survey" marks.

Great Memories.  Maybe next trip I'll be able to take another run at a couple of most likely to prove the belief in 3].  kayakbird

 

 

 

 

 

1

Share this post


Link to post

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0