Jump to content

Survey: Which Gps Fits Best In/on Belt/pocket?


Recommended Posts

Some GPSr units get better reception when held face-up, like my Garmin Vista C. It is nice and small and is easy to carry that way.

 

If I need my hands free for rock scrambling, it fits nicely, face-up, in the handle of a Case Logic camera case I have on the belt of my fanny pack.

Edited by Miragee
Link to comment

Yeah, I find I really like that about the Garmins-they are so easy to carry in the pocket. Must be handy on the belt to. I guess I did not realize about how they must be carried. Is there a Garmin model where it does not matter if you carry it vertically or horizontally?

 

-SunnyWalker :wub:

Link to comment

I use the belt clip provided with my 60cs. I attach it to my waist strap on my backpack. It sits in front of me to the side which makes it very easy to clip and unclip as needed. I used it this way in Shenandoah NP last month and it always kept locks on satellites.

Now I wonder, do the higher end units (besides the x series) have better sensitivity?

Link to comment

I'm guessing you just want to carry a GPS on the belt, not being turned ON.

 

I found the Map60C, and Map60Cx, easy to carry in it's canvas case on the belt, and still be able to get in the car, and buckle up, but I ripped open a canvas carry case, trying to carry the Map76S, on the belt, that GPS is just to big, to even try to keep on the belt, because the canvas case had shredden, when getting in and out of the car.

 

The small eXplorists units are easy to carry on the belt, but not the eXplorist XL, or the Meridians.

 

So I vote the 60 series GPS units.

Link to comment

Thanks for the feedback friends. I have written else where on this forum that I was thinking only about Magellans. But I have started to look at Garmins now.

 

Factors for me have been: Weight, battery type, size to fit in pocket or on belt.

Givens are: Unit must be able to plug into a PC for obvious reasons.

 

Magellan choice: Exp 210

Garmin: I'm looking.

 

I was very interested in the merigolds for a while but their size and weight finally made me discard purchasing one of them.

 

I am so intrigued by the idea of using a GPS in hiking. I am a member of Outward Bound, have done Mtn climing with younger, hiked a lot and consider myself very adept at map and compass. I am always prepared in that regard.

 

The GPS would enhance my outdoor experience in many ways as well as being a neat toy to utilize. Any feedback on the above would be appreciated. SunnyWalker :rolleyes:

Link to comment

I ended up purchasing an XL I find that if I carry it in my pocket it is ok, but it fills up a pocket. In my fannypack it works great. I mean, it will still track and everything right through the fabric of the fanny pack. So I will probably carry it there. Neat.

 

:ph34r: SunnyWalker

Link to comment

Thanks for the feedback friends. I have written else where on this forum that I was thinking only about Magellans. But I have started to look at Garmins now.

 

Factors for me have been: Weight, battery type, size to fit in pocket or on belt.

Givens are: Unit must be able to plug into a PC for obvious reasons.

 

Magellan choice: Exp 210

Garmin: I'm looking.

 

I was very interested in the merigolds for a while but their size and weight finally made me discard purchasing one of them.

 

I am so intrigued by the idea of using a GPS in hiking. I am a member of Outward Bound, have done Mtn climing with younger, hiked a lot and consider myself very adept at map and compass. I am always prepared in that regard.

 

The GPS would enhance my outdoor experience in many ways as well as being a neat toy to utilize. Any feedback on the above would be appreciated. SunnyWalker :ph34r:

 

If you're looking for small, compact, and good reception ... you can beat the Vista C/Cx. The older eTrex series suffered in their ability to obtain / maintain a quick lock on satellites, but the newer "C" family (Cx if you want the expandable memory) are great. The Garmin 60/76 families have better reception in dense foliage because of the change in antenna type and have a slightly richer feature set, but at more cost and a larger size. For it's size, the eTrex are great.

Link to comment

I have found through experience that belt clip cases have a drawback. I have had my cell phone and my Vista Cx pulled from my belt as I crawled over rocks and through dense brush. I now clip a caribiner to the long wrist strap that is connected to the GPSr case. Then wear the GPSr on my belt with the caribiner clipped to a belt loop. The strap is long enough to allow me to hold the GPSr in my hand and navigate. Should the unit slip off my belt the strap/caribiner keeps me from losing it. It also keeps me from being stupid and leaving the GPSr behind after I sign the log and rehide the cache.

Link to comment

I just discovered that Magellan now is offering a clip case for the eXplorist that "fits" on the belt. I (mistake) ordered one and will let you know how it works. I have since discovered the same item for almost half of what Mag is asking at Amazon.com

 

:( SunnyWalker

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...