+McDeHack Posted April 21, 2005 Posted April 21, 2005 Whats happening this evening. I am trying to submit some caches that I placed today. But I cannot get to do so. It is taking ages for the pages to appear. Before anyone asks, yes I ame running BB 1 meg. Even Groundspeak is slow. I think that the answer is that the hobby is getting too popular and the site is getting overloaded. I shall try again at the crack of the blanket. (Early in the morning). Quote
+McDeHack Posted April 21, 2005 Author Posted April 21, 2005 Yes it was after I posted this thread but as I posted my new caches it was up and down so to speak. Phew that was nackering... Quote
+Kitty Hawk Posted April 21, 2005 Posted April 21, 2005 The rate of growth of geocaching in this country can be seen on G:UK's awesome stats pages. The first UK cache was placed in Sept 2000. At the end of November 2002 there were 1349 caches placed in the UK. So far in 2005 1351 caches have been placed. If that rate of growth is replicated in other countries it's easy to see why GC.com is slowing down a tad! Quote
+kbootb Posted April 21, 2005 Posted April 21, 2005 dadgum.... I asked them to stop you uploading new caches. I can't find any of them... far too devious. But despite their best effortst you have managed to get them uploaded. I guess I've just got to try harder. Quote
+Dead Poet's Society Posted April 21, 2005 Posted April 21, 2005 Had the same problem on Sunday night (17.04.05) it took ages just to log one cache. I think you are right, there is a lot of traffic at peak times and the server just can't handle it. I tried again the following morning (when all the yanks were in bed) and it was fine. Quote
+kbootb Posted April 21, 2005 Posted April 21, 2005 Actually, looking at the cache page I'm really grateful. I have just ordered a handlebar mount for the garmin. And almost got the bike back into working order after 2 years in the shed. So this looks perfect. And in answer to the first question. Yes, the server has been having slow moments more and more often just lately. Quote
+McDeHack Posted April 22, 2005 Author Posted April 22, 2005 Actually, looking at the cache page I'm really grateful. I have just ordered a handlebar mount for the garmin. And almost got the bike back into working order after 2 years in the shed. So this looks perfect. And in answer to the first question. Yes, the server has been having slow moments more and more often just lately. I have just downloaded photos. What wonderful cycle paths (In most places) Quote
+CuplaKiwis Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 Noticed somewhere in the general GC.com stuff a note from Jeremy that "GC.com is on four servers that are currently running very close to capacity". Suspect we are seeing symptoms of this in the big slowdowns, timeouts etc. I have now paid up to become a Premium Member (Shock! Horror!!); I hope that my $30 will go straight towards a new server! Quote
+third-degree-witch Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 Noticed somewhere in the general GC.com stuff a note from Jeremy that "GC.com is on four servers that are currently running very close to capacity". Suspect we are seeing symptoms of this in the big slowdowns, timeouts etc. I have now paid up to become a Premium Member (Shock! Horror!!); I hope that my $30 will go straight towards a new server! only 1 server ? i think possibly another 4 may be a better idea Quote
+Pengy&Tigger Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 It's dying on it's a**e. i've been trying to drop off TBs at the St George's Day event for the last hour. It lets me write the logs but won't save them, It's not even a peak time either. T Quote
+-Phoenix- Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 The server slow downs are noticably at times when both US and Europe are active. They would probably get more return on investment if they established a separate European Server system, and then did daily cross atlantic updates. At least that way there would be no excuse for flooding Europe with offers that are only available stateside. Quote
+Mad H@ter Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 This website is no more! It has ceased to be! 'E's expired and gone to meet 'is maker! 'E's a stiff! Bereft of life, 'e rests in peace! If you hadn't cached 'im on Google 'e'd be pushing up the daisies! 'Is metabolic processes are now 'istory! 'E's off the twig! 'E's kicked the bucket, 'e's shuffled off 'is mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibile!! THIS IS AN EX-GEOCACHING WEBSITE!! Well at least, it is eer! Quote
+Pengy&Tigger Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 Another gripe - Logged on this morning and saw a few new caches. Set up a PQ for new and updated within 50 miles. Previewed it to make sure the new caches were on it - all there. Ran PQ which came in within 10 minutes but no new caches. GRRRR! T Quote
+-Phoenix- Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 Another gripe - Logged on this morning and saw a few new caches. Set up a PQ for new and updated within 50 miles. Previewed it to make sure the new caches were on it - all there. Ran PQ which came in within 10 minutes but no new caches. GRRRR! T All symptoms of multiple servers which individually locally cache database details, and periodically/infrequently update from the main DB server. Ive noticed this a number of times. Another example of this is getting the email alert to someone finding your cache and seeing that the find has been loged in the summary listing, yet when you go to the cache page there is nothing there. Quote
+McDeHack Posted April 22, 2005 Author Posted April 22, 2005 Moan, Moan, moan. Is there no satisfing you lot. I don't know who started this thread but they need topping. Er! wot me? nar. Someone useing my usermame. Quote
+Kitty Hawk Posted April 22, 2005 Posted April 22, 2005 I wondered if the USA were discussing this - They are Quote
+McDeHack Posted April 22, 2005 Author Posted April 22, 2005 I wondered if the USA were discussing this - They are So what would we do if it got that bad here in the UK early hours when USA sleeps. GCUK maybe? Could they cope? Quote
+dunos Posted April 23, 2005 Posted April 23, 2005 Half the problem is that it is all asp and windows based. They need more servers to cope with the load whereas if they had gone with a different technology it would have coped better on the same hardware. I imagine they are already doing this but they need to look at how the site is structured from a code point of view. Web applications have a tendency to grow organically and this leads to inefficiencies in the code. At the end of the day they will have to throw money at more and more servers. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.