You'd think.....

[+Team Cotati]

"Show numbers on map", would be the default.

[+VirginiaGator]

I wish it were!

[+BlessedBees]

Ahhhh, but I like that it isn't.

[+The Leprechauns]

I like the maps without the clutter of the numbers. I think I've clicked the box to show the numbers maybe twice. But maybe that's because I use pocket queries in my mapping software for detailed study and planning.

[+Theseus]

I also prefer no numbers. One cacher's opinion.

[+KRnlKilR]

I also prefer no numbers. One cacher's opinion.

I, also, would prefer the maps NOT have the numbers turned on by default. I think having all of the numbers turned on clutters the map even more than it is already.

KRnlKilR

[+Prime Suspect]

I also prefer no numbers. One cacher's opinion.

I, also, would prefer the maps NOT have the numbers turned on by default. I think having all of the numbers turned on clutters the map even more than it is already.

KRnlKilR

Huh? That already is the default. I don't get your point.

[+Theseus]

I also prefer no numbers. One cacher's opinion.

I, also, would prefer the maps NOT have the numbers turned on by default. I think having all of the numbers turned on clutters the map even more than it is already.

KRnlKilR

Huh? That already is the default. I don't get your point.

 

Yes, but the suggestion on the table is that the numbers be turned on by default. We are expressing our delight that this is currently not the case.

[+Lil Devil]

It would be nice if it would just remember the state from one invocation to the next, similar to how it remembers the map height setting.

[+michigansnorkelers]

I'd also like the numbers to be the default.

Edited November 10, 2007 by michigansnorkeler

[+BlessedBees]

seems like every other topic is about maps. Can we get these consolidated?