+tanisdad Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 (edited) Yesterday while out caching, I hiked to a cache where the last log shown was November of 2004. Prior to leaving I read the previous log where people talked about what they left and what they took. When I get to the cache I begin to read the log book and notice that the cache was found in May 05. The finder took a Susan B. Anthony Dollar and a TB and left a hotel pen. ( Not quite trading even or up). On the way back I got to thinking what if I inventoried the caches and included the inventory in my found log. Would this be helpful? Would it be a waste of time? I know I have read that cache owners can send a TB to grave yard - would this help remove those travel bugs that have been lost from the data base or would it cause increased confusion? Let me know what you think and please don't turn this into a SWAG Bashing thread. Tanisdad Edited July 18, 2005 by tanisdad Quote Link to comment
+Miragee Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I have seen people locally make a note if a TB they expected to find has gone missing. I wouldn't want to inventory some of the caches I find . . . I wouldn't know what to call some of that stuff. Quote Link to comment
+RichardMoore Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I wouldn't want to inventory some of the caches I find . . . I wouldn't know what to call some of that stuff. Exactly. When I placed my first cache I tried to keep a running list of what was in it. The problem is that people call the same thing by different names. For example: Someone took a toy car out of the cache, but my inventory didn't show a toy car as being in the cache. Someone had placed a flashlight in the cache, but when Id did my maintenance check there was no flashlight in the cache. I later found out that it was a flashlight key ring that was shaped like a race car. Quote Link to comment
newmonster Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I think part of the fun is not knowing what stuff is in the cache. Once in a while it is a big surprise! Its nice knowing that a travel bug is there but as for the rest of the stuff, i would rather remain in the dark. just one guys opinion though. Quote Link to comment
+tabulator32 Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I've seen caches with 20 or 30 different things in them. I don't know if I'd take the time to try and catalog everything. I don't know if I'd take the time to read them in the logs. Quote Link to comment
+BlueDeuce Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 (edited) You can inventory the content if you so wish, or not. Missing TB's should always be reported, each and every time by every cacher until it's removed from the cache page. Many figure that since it was mentioned in an earlier post they don't need to mention it again. Then the MIA notice gets pushed off the page with subsequent logs and someone goes out thinking the bug is there and we start the whole process over. (Yeah, I know the bug or cache owner should remove the missing bug listing, but how often does that happen) edit spelling Edited July 18, 2005 by BlueDeuce Quote Link to comment
+treasure_hunter Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I think it would be a waste of time. Quote Link to comment
+Isonzo Karst Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 mention the missing bug - something like, "cache owner the TB XDF is missing from your cache, you can follow the bug's link to remove him from your cache page" Many cache owners don't know they can do that. Quote Link to comment
+Delta-S Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 Maybe just dump it all out and post a digital image of it. I probably wouldn't read through the inventory list, but might look at the photo. Quote Link to comment
+TeamAO Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 Yesterday while out caching, I hiked to a cache where the last log shown was November of 2004. Prior to leaving I read the previous log where people talked about what they left and what they took. When I get to the cache I begin to read the log book and notice that the cache was found in May 05. The finder took a Susan B. Anthony Dollar and a TB and left a hotel pen. ( Not quite trading even or up). On the way back I got to thinking what if I inventoried the caches and included the inventory in my found log. Would this be helpful? Would it be a waste of time? I know I have read that cache owners can send a TB to grave yard - would this help remove those travel bugs that have been lost from the data base or would it cause increased confusion? Let me know what you think and please don't turn this into a SWAG Bashing thread. Tanisdad That idea would be great in a more "controlled" environment, but it's WAY to hard to keep up, especially if you own multiple caches. Quote Link to comment
+AuntieWeasel Posted July 18, 2005 Share Posted July 18, 2005 I definitely mention if a listed bug isn't there (provided its exit isn't mentioned in the paper log, and people haven't been marking it missing for 18 months in the online log). I'll sometimes mention a specific item not being there, if there's a buffalo nickel or a shiny rock I especially wanted. Beyond that, I will mention if the swag looks exceptionally good or exceptionally tired, or if I spotted something exceptionally interesting that I didn't take. Quote Link to comment
4wheelin_fool Posted July 19, 2005 Share Posted July 19, 2005 I think a posted inventory is a good idea in some caches to let the owner and others know what is going on with the cache, and whether it needs to be restocked. I have done it a few times. To do it to every cache might be a waste of time, but on the other hand, if cachers know that someone might post an inventory after their visit, they may be more likely to trade up, than down. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.