+Rentell "The Brain" Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Is there a way to have my caches reviewed by another reviwer? Quote Link to comment
+cerberus1 Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Not that I'm aware of. Suppose you could ask him for another, but I'd kinda think good luck with that. I believe when one doesn't see eye-to-eye with a Reviewer, that's what the Help Center (and appeals) is for. Quote Link to comment
+Sapience Trek Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 Work with your reviewer. They want to publish your caches, they really do. You can always use the help center to resolve a problem if you can't come to terms. If you want to get around the min 30 minute event, a new reviewer won't help. Quote Link to comment
+dprovan Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 This might be a more productive thread if you explain why you want your cache reviewed by another reviewer. Quote Link to comment
+Touchstone Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 This might be a more productive thread if you explain why you want your cache reviewed by another reviewer. Productive? I'm not so sure. Interesting? More than likely. My first thought was, you should be careful what you ask for. Quote Link to comment
Pup Patrol Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 This might be a more productive thread if you explain why you want your cache reviewed by another reviewer. I doubt it. One Reviewer has already responded. I doubt that the non-Reviewer crowd who have no idea what's going on, and would only hear from one side, would be of much help. Communicating with the Reviewer already involved would be the best way to go about things. If one insists, then one can go to Groundspeak Appeals. B. Quote Link to comment
+wmpastor Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 This might be a more productive thread if you explain why you want your cache reviewed by another reviewer. Yes, and this is the place to vent, and to seek solutions. Politely, of course. Quote Link to comment
+wmpastor Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I doubt that the non-Reviewer crowd who have no idea what's going on, and would only hear from one side, would be of much help. I've seen many situations involving cachers, reviewers, mods, landowners, city officials, etc. get mediated quite well in the forums. Don't underestimate the "non-reviewer crowd," as you call us. And occasionally the mediation is not successful, but, hey, people tried! Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Productive? I'm not so sure. Interesting? More than likely. My first thought was, you should be careful what you ask for. One could switch from the eastern PA reviewer to the western PA reviewer. Stories are legendary, however. Geocachers are known to move out of western PA just to get a new reviewer. They use cover stories like "the job market is better in the southeast" and "I wanted to be closer to my mother in law." Quote Link to comment
Pup Patrol Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I doubt that the non-Reviewer crowd who have no idea what's going on, and would only hear from one side, would be of much help. I've seen many situations involving cachers, reviewers, mods, landowners, city officials, etc. get mediated quite well in the forums. Don't underestimate the "non-reviewer crowd," as you call us. And occasionally the mediation is not successful, but, hey, people tried! Sorry, but those of us who are not Reviewers have no idea what has transpired until now. What are the "issues"? What has the Reviewer said? It's not appropriate to post emails in the forum, so how would we know what has really gone on? We've seen plenty of threads get locked because the "discussion" spirals into angst and complaints about Reviewers. There are avenues available. There's no purpose to involving forum members who have no idea what is going on, has gone on, etc. B. Quote Link to comment
+wmpastor Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 I doubt that the non-Reviewer crowd who have no idea what's going on, and would only hear from one side, would be of much help. I've seen many situations involving cachers, reviewers, mods, landowners, city officials, etc. get mediated quite well in the forums. Don't underestimate the "non-reviewer crowd," as you call us. And occasionally the mediation is not successful, but, hey, people tried! Sorry, but those of us who are not Reviewers have no idea what has transpired until now. What are the "issues"? What has the Reviewer said? It's not appropriate to post emails in the forum, so how would we know what has really gone on? We've seen plenty of threads get locked because the "discussion" spirals into angst and complaints about Reviewers. There are avenues available. There's no purpose to involving forum members who have no idea what is going on, has gone on, etc. B. Um, he can't *tell* us what went on?? Understood that not every storyteller is objective, but i've seen the intelligent, knowledgeable, savvy "non-reviewer crowd" (yeah, that's not my favorite terminology) repeatedly ferret out the truth in these matters. But all the angst that's already been voiced has probably scared off the original poster and therefore the community misses an opportunity to look at the reviewing process and have a good discussion, and possibly have something helpful to say to the cacher. "Talk to the reviewer and appeal if necessary" is accurate but deficient. We perhaps could have pointed out ways that the cacher could handle things better. And there's at least a 50% chance that this is not a "reviewer problem," but maybe a technical issue or even a diplomacy/communications issue where we suggest *what* to say when he contacts the reviewer. Quote Link to comment
+Gitchee-Gummee Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) Did I notice something what others have not? It seems a bit sad to see how this thread has degraded as it has, wanting to know just "what the story is". Unless I read it wrong, the crux issue has already been pointed out, early on. Perhaps (more likely, probably) the OP did notice it also... therefore not continuing the discussion here in the forums, but rather taking it on to appeals. Edited May 2, 2015 by Gitchee-Gummee Quote Link to comment
Pup Patrol Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 (edited) Did I notice something what others have not? It seems a bit sad to see how this thread has degraded as it has, wanting to know just "what the story is". Unless I read it wrong, the crux issue has already been pointed out, early on. Perhaps (more likely, probably) the OP did notice it also... therefore not continuing the discussion here in the forums, but rather taking it on to appeals. Yup, I noticed it, too. But some people prefer forum drama. And any opportunity to diss other forum members. B. Edited May 2, 2015 by Pup Patrol Quote Link to comment
+T.D.M.22 Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Did I notice something what others have not? It seems a bit sad to see how this thread has degraded as it has, wanting to know just "what the story is". Unless I read it wrong, the crux issue has already been pointed out, early on. Perhaps (more likely, probably) the OP did notice it also... therefore not continuing the discussion here in the forums, but rather taking it on to appeals. Someone taking advice given and not complaining, asking for another option? Oh, my. I feel light headed.... Oh, and if it continues, ibtl. Quote Link to comment
+Walts Hunting Posted May 2, 2015 Share Posted May 2, 2015 Productive? I'm not so sure. Interesting? More than likely. My first thought was, you should be careful what you ask for. One could switch from the eastern PA reviewer to the western PA reviewer. Stories are legendary, however. Geocachers are known to move out of western PA just to get a new reviewer. They use cover stories like "the job market is better in the southeast" and "I wanted to be closer to my mother in law." If "voting with their feet" is known to the hierarchy wouldn't that be an indication that it needs to be looked into. There is always a tendency to side with fellow members of any organization but it seems that in this case that seems to have been put aside. Quote Link to comment
+jellis Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 (edited) My area we have 3.5 reviewers. You never know who you will get. Depending on area, time of day. All of ours will be happy to help cachers and have their own opinions. And one of them was one of them who responded here. :D :D edit to clarify Edited May 5, 2015 by jellis Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted May 5, 2015 Share Posted May 5, 2015 Productive? I'm not so sure. Interesting? More than likely. My first thought was, you should be careful what you ask for. One could switch from the eastern PA reviewer to the western PA reviewer. Stories are legendary, however. Geocachers are known to move out of western PA just to get a new reviewer. They use cover stories like "the job market is better in the southeast" and "I wanted to be closer to my mother in law." If "voting with their feet" is known to the hierarchy wouldn't that be an indication that it needs to be looked into. There is always a tendency to side with fellow members of any organization but it seems that in this case that seems to have been put aside. My post was made in jest. The serious version: the reviewers bordering OReviewer's territory do their very best to follow a consistent set of standards. OReviewer has many years of experience (he's published many more caches than I have!) and is well-regarded both in his local community and in the reviewer community. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.