+Clinton Baptiste Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 I'm fortunate to have recently come in to some spare money and I'm going to blow the lot on upgrading my GPSr from a Garmin Vista Hcx to either a Satmap Active 10 or an Oregon 450. My question is, which one should I buy?? The Satmap looks very attractive due to its larger screen BUT the Oregon seems to be more geared to geocaching, which is what I'll mainly be using it for, plus it supports US mapping (handy for my occasional visits). Has anyone used both? Or have any opinons on which to get? I've searched the forums but there seems to be very little info on the Satmap. Thanks in advance Quote Link to comment
+Bear and Ragged Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 (edited) SatMap seems to be getting more "Caching friendly" and does have OS maps... Edit to add: So does the Oregon,with the Discoverer series. Question is... Which gives you the most maps, for the price? Edited February 24, 2010 by Bear and Ragged Quote Link to comment
+Bambography Posted February 24, 2010 Share Posted February 24, 2010 Oregon will accept Pocket Queries direct from GC.com and with the field note function, help keep notes for logging when you get home. I looked at Satmap last year at the Outdoor Show (Which is at the end of March & might save you a few bob if you buy there) and can't say that it really impressed me, but that is a personal point of view and not really 'using' it. That was also before I had the Oregon. Quote Link to comment
+Longfram Kev Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 I, very luckily, got an Oregan 550t from Santa and find it brilliant to use. I haven't got the hang of all the whitles and bells yet but I'm getting there. There is a Wiki site dedicated to the Garmins Gps and answers all sorts of questions and gives detailed stages on how to do what. I've found it very usefull. Quote Link to comment
+The_Street_Searchers Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 Ive tested both for geocaching and for me the Oregon wins hands down. I found the Satmap very unfriendly to use whereas the Oregon was very intuative. Quote Link to comment
+Walker Dan Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 Have already got a 60CSX but have ordered a Satmap today, mainly for walking but will also use it for caching as well. Most reports are good and at least it's a decent size. Will see how it goes. Quote Link to comment
+*mouse* Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 If you want it primarily for caching then definately the oregon. Quote Link to comment
+little-miss-naughty Posted February 25, 2010 Share Posted February 25, 2010 I, very luckily, got an Oregan 550t from Santa and find it brilliant to use. I haven't got the hang of all the whitles and bells yet but I'm getting there. There is a Wiki site dedicated to the Garmins Gps and answers all sorts of questions and gives detailed stages on how to do what. I've found it very usefull. i also got a 550t from santa very luck i was and i love it so so much. lmn Quote Link to comment
+NickandAliandEliza Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 Oregon all the way. Quote Link to comment
+Jonovich Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 (edited) A friend I go caching with has a Satmap and we are usually on our second cache before the Satmap even gets a Satellite fix Go for an Oregon with Garmin Discoverer Maps. If you apply the latest Firmware (3.20 on the 550) then the Oregon's are a joy to use! Jon. Edited February 26, 2010 by Dakar4x4 Quote Link to comment
+mcwomble Posted February 26, 2010 Share Posted February 26, 2010 A friend I go caching with has a Satmap and we are usually on our second cache before the Satmap even gets a Satellite fix Most odd - I have no trouble with mine, but then I do use my Satmap as my in car navigation tool as well. Since the v1.4 software install, the battery life seems to be much longer and the hibernate settings seem to improve start up time too. The POI locking problem is greatly diminished and there are now bespoke GC icons. About the only thing I've found the Satmap can't do yet is Wherigo caching. On the plus side you get a big screen OS map to revel in and with a bit of nouce given a GPS signal failure, you can still navigate yourself to the rough cache location, certainly close enough to start searching with the clue. Quote Link to comment
+Clinton Baptiste Posted February 26, 2010 Author Share Posted February 26, 2010 Thanks for the responses. I think I'm swinging towards the Oregon, particularly as I've heard Garmin will be doing a good deal on a 450/Discoverer maps combo at the upcoming Outdoor Show. Having said that the Satmap's bigger screen is REALLY appealing. Decisions, decisions...... I shall try them both at the show and decide then probably. Cheers! Quote Link to comment
+Walker Dan Posted March 11, 2010 Share Posted March 11, 2010 Having had a 60 CSx for 3 years and a yellow Etrex for 5 years before that have bitten the bullet and bought a Satmap. It's been brilliant so far - locks on quickly and the bigger screen is ideal for walking. Have just imported a gpx file from GSAK with all the info, logs and hints that are required. So basically, can say so far it's fine although I understand there were one or two issues with earlier Satmaps. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.