knowschad Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I don't even know if the cacher's rude log was a response to my NA log on his/er cache, but it was warrented. The coordinates are off and it has been almost two months. Was the issue corrected? I looked through your find logs for the past couple months, but didn't see anything that was disabled or archived due to bad coords. What cache was it? You know for a cop you are a lousy investigator. CR... take a look at the "rude logger's" caches. The older one was archived following a NA log by TerraViators. The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds, but not on TV's, indicating that the RL's rude log was due to TV's NA log. Got it, now? Sorry...you are NOT right..."rude logger" has posted a few rude comments....TerraViators was NOT the first cacher to receive snarky comments from the "rude logger". Rude Logger only has 17 finds....go through the logs and look for yourself. I didn't, and will not, look at every log that person has posted. I checked the first few and they looked just fine. I don't care about it enough to go through all 17 logs. Quote Link to comment
+KBfamily Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I don't even know if the cacher's rude log was a response to my NA log on his/er cache, but it was warrented. The coordinates are off and it has been almost two months. Was the issue corrected? I looked through your find logs for the past couple months, but didn't see anything that was disabled or archived due to bad coords. What cache was it? You know for a cop you are a lousy investigator. CR... take a look at the "rude logger's" caches. The older one was archived following a NA log by TerraViators. The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds, but not on TV's, indicating that the RL's rude log was due to TV's NA log. Got it, now? Sorry...you are NOT right..."rude logger" has posted a few rude comments....TerraViators was NOT the first cacher to receive snarky comments from the "rude logger". Rude Logger only has 17 finds....go through the logs and look for yourself. I didn't, and will not, look at every log that person has posted. I checked the first few and they looked just fine. I don't care about it enough to go through all 17 logs. I guess you will have to take my word for it....I went through ALL 17 logs and this cacher is rude to more cachers than just TerraViators. Quote Link to comment
knowschad Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I don't even know if the cacher's rude log was a response to my NA log on his/er cache, but it was warrented. The coordinates are off and it has been almost two months. Was the issue corrected? I looked through your find logs for the past couple months, but didn't see anything that was disabled or archived due to bad coords. What cache was it? You know for a cop you are a lousy investigator. CR... take a look at the "rude logger's" caches. The older one was archived following a NA log by TerraViators. The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds, but not on TV's, indicating that the RL's rude log was due to TV's NA log. Got it, now? Sorry...you are NOT right..."rude logger" has posted a few rude comments....TerraViators was NOT the first cacher to receive snarky comments from the "rude logger". Rude Logger only has 17 finds....go through the logs and look for yourself. I didn't, and will not, look at every log that person has posted. I checked the first few and they looked just fine. I don't care about it enough to go through all 17 logs. I guess you will have to take my word for it....I went through ALL 17 logs and this cacher is rude to more cachers than just TerraViators. So, what is your point? My point was simply that it seemed to be aimed at TV's NA log. OK... that may or may not be true. It really doesn't change anything, does it? I wasn't defending the guy, I was simply tryiing to guess at a motive. Let it go. Quote Link to comment
+KBfamily Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I don't even know if the cacher's rude log was a response to my NA log on his/er cache, but it was warrented. The coordinates are off and it has been almost two months. Was the issue corrected? I looked through your find logs for the past couple months, but didn't see anything that was disabled or archived due to bad coords. What cache was it? You know for a cop you are a lousy investigator. CR... take a look at the "rude logger's" caches. The older one was archived following a NA log by TerraViators. The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds, but not on TV's, indicating that the RL's rude log was due to TV's NA log. Got it, now? Sorry...you are NOT right..."rude logger" has posted a few rude comments....TerraViators was NOT the first cacher to receive snarky comments from the "rude logger". Rude Logger only has 17 finds....go through the logs and look for yourself. I didn't, and will not, look at every log that person has posted. I checked the first few and they looked just fine. I don't care about it enough to go through all 17 logs. I guess you will have to take my word for it....I went through ALL 17 logs and this cacher is rude to more cachers than just TerraViators. So, what is your point? My point was simply that it seemed to be aimed at TV's NA log. OK... that may or may not be true. It really doesn't change anything, does it? I wasn't defending the guy, I was simply tryiing to guess at a motive. Let it go. My point is that you were giving incorrect information...a little defensive aren't you? Quote Link to comment
mresoteric Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) Nevermind Edited May 3, 2011 by mresoteric Quote Link to comment
+KBfamily Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I guess you will have to take my word for it....I went through ALL 17 logs and this cacher is rude to more cachers than just TerraViators. 43 hides. I think you are qualified to read logs and judge degree of rudeness to other cachers. The good thing for me is, I have never had anyone say anything but sweet, supportive, grateful things in their logs....I have only had GREAT experiences with every cacher I have ever run into...it is so fun to bump into fellow cachers on the trail...I actually was on a desert trail yesterday and found a family in the bushes looking for one of my caches...the kids were laughing and playing with the swag I put in the cache...totally made my day.... Maybe that is why the rude cacher really bugs me...he was out of line and treated someone badly...someone who spent their money and time to place a cache and then the guy just was snotty in a log....not nice....not necessary.... Quote Link to comment
+Coldgears Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 From what I'm seeing, is the CO got the wrong coords for his cache, then made an effort to fix the issue, not doing so in a timely manner terraviators posted a NA log in which the "rude cacher" got upset and posted a false, but mean log on one of terraviators logs, in which terraviators came to the forums and told everybody what just happended sans the NA log. From that you guys can decide who's right or wrong. Quote Link to comment
+Coldgears Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 (edited) Delete Edited May 3, 2011 by Coldgears Quote Link to comment
knowschad Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 My point is that you were giving incorrect information...a little defensive aren't you? Not really, on either point. My statement was, " The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds". I stand by that. I didn't say they posted polite logs on all other finds. I didn't check all other finds. Perhaps I should have said "on all other finds that I looked at", and that would have been 100% true. I did not see one single snarky log by them on the (three, I think) other logs of theirs that I looked at. And I was not defending them anyway... I was simply stating what I had seen, and my supposition that their log was most likely due to the NA log. If I was wrong about that... I can live with that. Not defensive in the least. Quote Link to comment
+KBfamily Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 From what I'm seeing, is the CO got the wrong coords for his cache, then made an effort to fix the issue, not doing so in a timely manner terraviators posted a NA log in which the "rude cacher" got upset and posted a false, but mean log on one of terraviators logs, in which terraviators came to the forums and told everybody what just happended sans the NA log. From that you guys can decide who's right or wrong. Just for your own moment of "wow, this is the worst cache placement mess ever", have you read the two caches that rude cacher placed? I had never seen anything like that mess....it is comical except for the fact that it wasted a lot of people's time. Quote Link to comment
mresoteric Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 My point is that you were giving incorrect information...a little defensive aren't you? Not really, on either point. My statement was, " The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds". I stand by that. I didn't say they posted polite logs on all other finds. I didn't check all other finds. Perhaps I should have said "on all other finds that I looked at", and that would have been 100% true. I did not see one single snarky log by them on the (three, I think) other logs of theirs that I looked at. And I was not defending them anyway... I was simply stating what I had seen, and my supposition that their log was most likely due to the NA log. If I was wrong about that... I can live with that. Not defensive in the least. But you did make it sound like terraviators was the only person that received a rude log. KB just corrected that assumption and suggested that the relatively low number of logs would be easy to verify. Quote Link to comment
knowschad Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 My point is that you were giving incorrect information...a little defensive aren't you? Not really, on either point. My statement was, " The "rude logger" seems to have posted polite logs on other finds". I stand by that. I didn't say they posted polite logs on all other finds. I didn't check all other finds. Perhaps I should have said "on all other finds that I looked at", and that would have been 100% true. I did not see one single snarky log by them on the (three, I think) other logs of theirs that I looked at. And I was not defending them anyway... I was simply stating what I had seen, and my supposition that their log was most likely due to the NA log. If I was wrong about that... I can live with that. Not defensive in the least. But you did make it sound like terraviators was the only person that received a rude log. KB just corrected that assumption and suggested that the relatively low number of logs would be easy to verify. No... I said that they "seemed to have posted polite logs on other finds", and that is a true statement. I never said, nor did I intend to say that they did that on all of their other logs, because I didn't read all of their other logs. Besides, you, of all people, should know that I do not approve of rude logs, right? Quote Link to comment
mresoteric Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Besides, you, of all people, should know that I do not approve of rude logs, right? What do I know. I have no hides. Quote Link to comment
+luvvinbird Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I just wasted 40 minutes of my life reading all 64 comments. I'm going to bed... Quote Link to comment
knowschad Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 Besides, you, of all people, should know that I do not approve of rude logs, right? What do I know. I have no hides. You will. Whippersnapper. Quote Link to comment
+WRASTRO Posted May 3, 2011 Share Posted May 3, 2011 I just wasted 40 minutes of my life reading all 64 comments. I'm going to bed... I have often wondered if birds were slow readers. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.