+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Look at hot the Geocaching website and forums have changed. The first forum host was infopop, it's no longer around. Link to comment
sabrefan7 Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Cool I have never seen that before,, The pages take for ever to load but thanks for posting Link to comment
knowschad Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Cool I have never seen that before,, The pages take for ever to load but thanks for posting That's the Internet Archive site, better known as the Wayback machine. Its a lot of fun to explore various websites there. Its also a useful spot for seeing changes in the geocaching guidelines. Link to comment
+thedeadpirate Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 (edited) Cool I have never seen that before,, The pages take for ever to load but thanks for posting Your welcome. Edited July 10, 2010 by Pinehurst Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 Cool I have never seen that before,, The pages take for ever to load but thanks for posting That's the Internet Archive site, better known as the Wayback machine. Its a lot of fun to explore various websites there. Its also a useful spot for seeing changes in the geocaching guidelines. Lol, I will try it. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Lol, but I did report one. Link to comment
+thedeadpirate Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Lol, but I did report one. No you didn't. Link to comment
jholly Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Lol, but I did report one. No you didn't. why? Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Lol, but I did report one. No you didn't. Yes I did, I linked to it. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 10, 2010 Author Share Posted July 10, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL Lol, but I did report one. No you didn't. why? yaa. Link to comment
+thedeadpirate Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 why? Gonna explain below. Just including this post to show spongy that you can reply to multiple posts at once. Yes I did, I linked to it. You linked to the report of a site feature, not a site bug. yaa. You can reply to multiple posts by clicking the Quote button at the bottom of each post. I suspect you are fully aware of this. Me thinks you are wiser than you let on oh spongy one. Link to comment
Keystone Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Please remain on topic. Finding and discussing things found using the Wayback Machine can be a fun topic. Thank you. Link to comment
+thedeadpirate Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Please remain on topic. Finding and discussing things found using the Wayback Machine can be a fun topic. Thank you. True, but then if we stuck entirely to that it would pretty much belong in that other section that we don't want to talk about. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 11, 2010 Author Share Posted July 11, 2010 why? Gonna explain below. Just including this post to show spongy that you can reply to multiple posts at once. Yes I did, I linked to it. You linked to the report of a site feature, not a site bug. yaa. You can reply to multiple posts by clicking the Quote button at the bottom of each post. I suspect you are fully aware of this. Me thinks you are wiser than you let on oh spongy one. 1. I know, but how? 2. I think it is a bug, there is an e-mail link and a contact link, that may seem confusing to some people like me. 3. I don't like that feacher because I get confused where each message ends when quoting multi quote messages. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 11, 2010 Author Share Posted July 11, 2010 Please remain on topic. Finding and discussing things found using the Wayback Machine can be a fun topic. Thank you. True, but then if we stuck entirely to that it would pretty much belong in that other section that we don't want to talk about. What section? Link to comment
+DragonsWest Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 12, 2010 Author Share Posted July 12, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. Link to comment
knowschad Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. Why??????? Link to comment
+Sioneva Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. Why??????? Lol Link to comment
Keystone Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. That post is on topic. You could learn from that. In the meantime, please leave the moderating to the professionals*. Thank you. *I do not mean "professionals" in the Ashnikes sense of being paid a six figure salary to watch over an internet hobby forum. I mean "professionals" in the sense of knowing how to do it. Link to comment
+power69 Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL nothing MAGOR today i guess. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 12, 2010 Author Share Posted July 12, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. Why??????? That is hijacking. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 12, 2010 Author Share Posted July 12, 2010 Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. That post is on topic. You could learn from that. In the meantime, please leave the moderating to the professionals*. Thank you. *I do not mean "professionals" in the Ashnikes sense of being paid a six figure salary to watch over an internet hobby forum. I mean "professionals" in the sense of knowing how to do it. Sorry. Link to comment
+Pinehurst Posted July 12, 2010 Author Share Posted July 12, 2010 Oh spongy one, you got me. I was sure you were reporting bugs with the new website changes. LOL nothing MAGOR today i guess. Nope. Link to comment
knowschad Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 My goodness! I didn't realize how much GC had changed since I first started. At least it's still pretty friendly. I clicked the news link to the slashdot.org article, from 9/25/2000 (which I read at the time it was published, though it would take over two years for me to go get my own GPS and get started on this thing) I have to say Slashdot has fared far worse - it's a festival of bloated javascript. Well done, Lackeys, please keep GC simple! Please start a new thread next time. Thanks. Why??????? That is hijacking. Not the way I saw it. It was conversation that related to the old geocaching.com web pages and how they compared to another site. Conversations sometimes wander. Link to comment
Motorcycle_Mama Posted July 12, 2010 Share Posted July 12, 2010 Since the OP cannot seem to stay on topic despite two warnings from Keystone, I am closing this thread. To the OP, if you wish to start a thread about the Internet Time Machine, please do so in the Off-Topic forum. Link to comment
Recommended Posts