+keehotee Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 (edited) Don't know what happened there - post was fine in the preview pane. Anyway..... Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh......................!!!! Edited to add laughing frogs. That's an ironic, hysterical, NO....... kind of laugh, not a jovial, hahaha kind of laugh. Edited August 24, 2009 by keehotee Quote Link to comment
+Stuey Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 Not with you.... Whassup? Quote Link to comment
+Haggis Hunter Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 I'm guessing that you either don't like Gowenhouse caches, or you don't like the idea of a circular walk with a lot of caches along it?? Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted August 24, 2009 Author Share Posted August 24, 2009 I'm guessing that you either don't like Gowenhouse caches, or you don't like the idea of a circular walk with a lot of caches along it?? I've nothing against Gowenhouse caches per se - it was just a shock reaction at yet another big pile'o'micros and smalls appearing down the road..... Quote Link to comment
+Stuey Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 The horror... Cachers placing caches for cachers to find... Whatever next? Quote Link to comment
+Munkeh Posted August 24, 2009 Share Posted August 24, 2009 The horror... Cachers placing caches for cachers to find... Whatever next? cachers going looking for them? Quote Link to comment
+keehotee Posted August 24, 2009 Author Share Posted August 24, 2009 The horror... Cachers placing caches for cachers to find... Whatever next? You don't know how lucky you are down there... Quote Link to comment
+HazelS Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 But surely it doesn't matter what size, or how close a cache is - it's what it's taking you to see that's the important bit... I'm in work and can't see the map that's attached as it's been censored, but it's not like Gowenhouse operate in a dreadful part of the world....... Quote Link to comment
+gse1986 Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 Like the others i'm a little lost - flickr r showing an "unavailable" picture so that could explain everything maybe. Regarding the title though, it would be useful. Personally I wouldn't run a PQ based on a user's caches but for filtering withing the google maps it would be useful. Just a few hours ago I was looking for a series and tried to filter them through the PQ preview but alas the option wasn't there! Quote Link to comment
+Pharisee Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 As ever, GSAK is your friend. You can filter by cache setter easily. Quote Link to comment
+gse1986 Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 As ever, GSAK is your friend. You can filter by cache setter easily. It doesn't add them all to a map easily though [] Quote Link to comment
+Pharisee Posted August 25, 2009 Share Posted August 25, 2009 As ever, GSAK is your friend. You can filter by cache setter easily. It doesn't add them all to a map easily though [ ] Oh yes it does.... just select your subset and run the 'myGoogleEarth.gsk' macro. It will open Google Earth with all your selected caches shown. Quote Link to comment
Jester1970 Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 But surely it doesn't matter what size, or how close a cache is - it's what it's taking you to see that's the important bit... I'm in work and can't see the map that's attached as it's been censored, but it's not like Gowenhouse operate in a dreadful part of the world....... Yes, but what if a particular cacher repeatedly places micros in places which aren't suitable, or are uninteresting in the first place? Quote Link to comment
+HazelS Posted August 26, 2009 Share Posted August 26, 2009 (edited) But surely it doesn't matter what size, or how close a cache is - it's what it's taking you to see that's the important bit... I'm in work and can't see the map that's attached as it's been censored, but it's not like Gowenhouse operate in a dreadful part of the world....... Yes, but what if a particular cacher repeatedly places micros in places which aren't suitable, or are uninteresting in the first place? Surely Beauty is in the eye of the beholder? What may be interesting / pretty / a fab place to you might be my idea of hell? I dislike large caches cos they tend to be choc full of McTat and calling cards, and have unimaginitive hiding places. Some Micros / Nanos are clever and well hidden, they have a log book in 'em and do the job just fine! Edited cos it's past my bedtime and my typing is dreadful! Edited August 26, 2009 by HazelS Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.