A cache i have previously found has moved 90 feet, can i log it as a find again?

[+Lotho]

As the title states, a cache ive already found has been moved 90 feet after it was muggled at the first place. Would it be right to go and hunt for it again and log it as found again, or should i not log it as found again because its the same GC page and number?

 

Thanks

 

Lotho

[+Chuy!]

The general consensus is one find per GC#. Although at some events, cachers will post multiple finds for the temp caches set up for the event.

[+poohstickz]

As the title states, a cache ive already found has been moved 90 feet after it was muggled at the first place. Would it be right to go and hunt for it again and log it as found again, or should i not log it as found again because its the same GC page and number?

 

Thanks

 

Lotho

 

It's the same cache as you yourself said, and you've already logged a find on that cache. There's no reason not to go find it again if you wanted to but as for logging multiple finds on the same cache... that's up to you but to most folks that's somewhat cheesy.

[+briansnat]

If its the same listing, I wouldn't. In the end if you decide to, its between you and the cache owner.

[+Lotho]

Ok, thanks. Im not desperate for one extra smiley so i wont go back there, well if I do i wotn log another find anyway.

[+XopherN71]

If it makes you feel better, go for it

[+StarBrand]

I wouldn't if it is the same GC #.

[+Polarbz]

Survey says... No.

 

But heres a smiley for trying =)

[+Renegade Knight]

As the title states, a cache ive already found has been moved 90 feet after it was muggled at the first place. Would it be right to go and hunt for it again and log it as found again, or should i not log it as found again because its the same GC page and number?

 

Thanks

 

Lotho

 

If the onwers cache page says "Hey ya'll come on and log this puppy again" by all means find and log again if that's your cup of tea. If not, pass.

[crawil]

*I* wouldn't log it again because of the same GC number. We had one around here that was archived and a new cache page created. The hide was the same bison tube in the same hole, just a different GC number. I logged that one!

[+Photographer Jim]

I have seen a number of cases where the cache owner has moved a cache for some reason, and considers the new hide significantly different, and therefore posts that cachers are invited to find the cache in its new hiding place and log it as a new find. Minus that invitation by the owner, I would not relog the cache as a new find (although I might go seek it out anyway, in the hopes that the new hide would be a challenge and some extra fun).