+stalsa31 Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 (edited) http://www.danrichter.de/unaktuell/listen/downbylaw.jpg[/url] The guy should rather rate this cache as a two star terrain. Edited November 13, 2007 by stalsa31 Quote
+meralgia Posted November 16, 2007 Posted November 16, 2007 I've got a cache that keeps falling out of the dang tree. I downgraded the terrain rating only to have a guy say, "I adjusted its altitude to where I am assuming (based on the logs) it should have been." No big deal, so I simply adjusted the description to read, "Apparently the cache can't decide on which terrain rating it prefers. It's been in both locations recently. Good luck... this is as close to a "moving cache" as we'll ever get!". Bad form?? Quote
+joranda Posted November 22, 2007 Posted November 22, 2007 I see them all the time. I just went to one a day ago that was a 3.5 and all it was was a guard rail with a little slope. Oh well, what can you do? Quote
+Miragee Posted November 23, 2007 Posted November 23, 2007 There is one here that is rated '5' . . . It is a short walk, up a steep hill. Apparently, the cache owner thinks a Jeep 4WD, with lockers, is necessary to get to the cache . . . Quote
+Steinwälzer Posted November 24, 2007 Posted November 24, 2007 I have several caches in my area that are rated as T1 but that are hidden on buildings or trees in such a way that a person like me is not able to get that cache because the cache is placed too high. Or you have to climb on a wall to reach it. If you ask the owner about the rating they often answer "you can reach the cache location with a wheelchair, so it's a T1" I guess there is a little bit of misunderstanding about that. You should be able get the cache from a wheelchair if it's T1, or I am wrong about that? Quote
+briansnat Posted November 24, 2007 Posted November 24, 2007 I found a 4/4.5 yesterday. It was a half mile hike over a flat, well maintained trail. The cache was about 20 feet off the trail hidden in a stand of rhododendron that required a bit of ducking under branches, but 4.5 for terrain? And 4 for difficulty? It was a Tupperware container hidden in the split of a tree, basically the first place most people would look. It had over 20 finds and I can't believe not one finder questioned the rating before me. Quote
+blb9556 Posted November 25, 2007 Posted November 25, 2007 I see these all the time. Like one needed higher terrain because you had to get on a trash can. A person even fell in the trash Quote
+Miragee Posted November 25, 2007 Posted November 25, 2007 I have several caches in my area that are rated as T1 but that are hidden on buildings or trees in such a way that a person like me is not able to get that cache because the cache is placed too high. Or you have to climb on a wall to reach it. If you ask the owner about the rating they often answer "you can reach the cache location with a wheelchair, so it's a T1" I guess there is a little bit of misunderstanding about that. You should be able get the cache from a wheelchair if it's T1, or I am wrong about that? You are not wrong about that. The Terrain '1' is a cache that should be retrievable by someone in a wheelchair. If a cache owner is being obstinate about changing the Terrain to a '1.5' or higher, I would send a friendly request to my local Reviewer, explaining the situation. Perhaps they will bump it up, so others aren't frustrated in their quest for what should be a wheelchair-friendly cache. Quote
knowschad Posted November 26, 2007 Posted November 26, 2007 I found a 4/4.5 yesterday. It was a half mile hike over a flat, well maintained trail. The cache was about 20 feet off the trail hidden in a stand of rhododendron that required a bit of ducking under branches, but 4.5 for terrain? While I totally agree with you about the unpredictable and subjective nature of the ratings, why on earth would even you go for what you thought was a 4.5 terrain cache while recovering from a soccer injury? Sounds to me like you should be grateful! LOL! Quote
+briansnat Posted November 27, 2007 Posted November 27, 2007 I found a 4/4.5 yesterday. It was a half mile hike over a flat, well maintained trail. The cache was about 20 feet off the trail hidden in a stand of rhododendron that required a bit of ducking under branches, but 4.5 for terrain? While I totally agree with you about the unpredictable and subjective nature of the ratings, why on earth would even you go for what you thought was a 4.5 terrain cache while recovering from a soccer injury? Sounds to me like you should be grateful! LOL! I didn't know it was a 4/4.5 until I went to log it. The park had very flat terrain which is why we chose it. I did step the wrong way on a root on the way out and probably set back my recovery another 2 weeks. Ouch that hurt! The swelling is just going down today. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.