+Team GeoBlast Posted October 6, 2008 Share Posted October 6, 2008 I am quite certain that I've stated the vacation cache listing standards accurately, and exactly as Groundspeak wishes for them to be applied. The instructions I received do not allow for variation. I have been overruled when my attempts to be stricter have been appealed, and I'm not aware of any instructions from Groundspeak that say a vacation cache in Ohio should be treated differently than one in Hawaii. So, if your reviewer is doing something stricter than Groundspeak has specifically asked us to do, he or she is flying under the radar. The cache owner is welcome to appeal the decision. It is not my concern. Rather, my obligation as a forum moderator is to state the listing guideline interpretations as accurately as possible. People from all over read the forums. Fair enough. Since people from all over read this forum, it's my hope that people from all over are not only made aware of the appeal process that you brought up but they understand that working closely with their reviewer and helping them understand local issues is a good best practice. Quote Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.