+Beffums Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 (edited) Ok, so say you went out to check on one of your caches. You had yet to get any DNFs on it, you just were doing normal rounds on your hides. If you got there, opened the cache, checked there was adequate swag, dry contents, etc etc... but didn't need to do anything, would you log it as a note or as that new option - owner maintenance? I guess the question mostly is - unless there was a needs maintenace log on the cache, does it matter? Does it make a difference to reviewers (or anyone else), if there's a recent owner maintenance log vs a note saying that the owner swung by their cache and checked in on it? It's just something I wonder about when I'm trying to note maintenance runs on caches... edit: typos Edited March 9, 2006 by Beffums Quote
+Sugar Glider Sweatshop Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 We don't know if it makes any difference or not, but we use Owner Maintenance if we actually fixed something (replaced damp log, replaced muggled cache, moved cache back to proper hiding spot, etc.) and a Note if we just confirmed that the cache is still there, and everything's OK. Quote
+Semper Questio Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 Ok, so say you went out to check on one of your caches. You had yet to get any DNFs on it, you just were doing normal rounds on your hides. If you got there, opened the cache, checked there was adequate swag, dry contents, etc etc... but didn't need to do anything, would you log it as a note or as that new option - owner maintenance? I guess the question mostly is - unless there was a needs maintenace log on the cache, does it matter? Does it make a difference to reviewers (or anyone else), if there's a recent owner maintenance log vs a note saying that the owner swung by their cache and checked in on it? It's just something I wonder about when I'm trying to note maintenance runs on caches... edit: typos Since no one had stated that any maintenance was needed and especially since this was a routine check, nothing needed to be done, and you did nothing that affected prospective hunters, I wouldn't log anything. Quote
+BillsBayou Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 If I go to the trouble of going out there to see if it is still there, still ok, etc, then that's maintenance. If someone posts anything in the logs to which I feel I must respond, it's a note. Not that I practice what I preach, but those seem to be the basics for me. Quote
+briansnat Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 I've been using "owner maintenance" since it became available. Quote
+Big Sky Explorers Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 It would be nice to log the visit on take an inventory to post. I would like that as a cache seeker. Quote
+ZackJones Posted March 9, 2006 Posted March 9, 2006 I use the owner maintenance log. I like the Green and White Plus sign Quote
+Segerguy Posted March 10, 2006 Posted March 10, 2006 It would give me confidence as a seeker that the cache was still available and in good shape, worth my time to seek it out. I would like that. Quote
[RR]Macavity Posted March 10, 2006 Posted March 10, 2006 As a matter of fact, I posted an Owner Maintenance log for Digital Dreams today - almost lost it to some high winds, so I had to move it elsewhere. It's still available, though. Quote
+Team Red Oak Posted March 10, 2006 Posted March 10, 2006 Huh I never noticed the owner maintenance icon and have always posted a note. I wonder if I can go back and change the icons from when I actually did maintenance? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.