ArtMan Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 What exactly is so offensive about the Katrina post, and if "Max Cacher" (whoever he is; not a regular in this forum, surely) is authorized to close the topic, would it be asking too much to explain why? Perhaps if Rob had referred to all the benchmarks under the floodwaters rather than the trivial loss of life and property, it would have been OK to express concern for our fellow Americans at a time of enormous hardship? -ArtMan- Quote Link to comment
+2oldfarts (the rockhounders) Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Artman, There is a duplicate thread in the Geocaching.com Web Site forum & that is probably the reason it was closed here. John Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) There was absolutely nothing "offensive" about the closed thread. Off-topic threads are closed and moved to the proper forum every day of the week. Max Cacher, the moderator for the Benchmark Hunting forum, applied the forum guidelines and closed a thread that was off-topic in this forum. If you wish to post your views on how Groundspeak ought to respond to the Hurricane Katrina tragedy, please do so in the thread mentioned in John's post above. If you wish to convey your sympathy and concerns for geocachers and benchmarkers in the affected region, please post to the thread in the South and Southeast regional forum. Thanks, Keystone Global Forum Moderator Edited August 31, 2005 by Keystone Quote Link to comment
Max Cacher Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 (edited) I read every post in every thread and do not post much as a moderator and only causality under my real login name, is that so bad . Am also a moderator for the South, Southeast Forums. There are duplicate threads popping up everywhere, but the one in South, Southeast Forums will remain open. I do apologize for not stating why the thread was closed, I do this so rarely, kind of thought you would just know why as it was being done site wide Max Cacher Geocaching.com Volunteer Cache Reviewer // Moderator BTW have found and logged over 500 benchmarks if it matters Edited August 31, 2005 by Max Cacher Quote Link to comment
+2oldfarts (the rockhounders) Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 Max Cacher Geocaching.com Volunteer Cache Reviewer // Moderator BTW have found and logged over 500 benchmarks if it matters Of course it matters! We wouldn't want just any old moderator here in the benchmark forums. John Quote Link to comment
+PFF Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Impressive total, Max.....although I don't know how you have time to BM hunt and read every post in the forum! [grin] -Paul- Quote Link to comment
+BuckBrooke Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Although the Katrina hurricane damage to New Orleans does beg the question. There are a LOT of benchmarks in the New Orleans, SE Louisiana, Coastal Mississippi area. Especially as the local agencies have been trying to track the land settling and disappearing in that area. Kind of a trivial thought in the midst of the carnage, but I can't imagine how many of the marks have gone missing, not to mention some of the off shore drilling rig PIDs. Quote Link to comment
evenfall Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 Fwiw, I just posted what I did because because I felt it was worth saying. I don't post anywhere else. My friends are here. I don't geocache, so to the geocacher's, I'd add little value. I said it here for the people who read only here. That was what I was thinking. You know, just to say to the Benchmark Hunters, keep those folks in harm's way in your thoughts. That's all. To be honest, the rules, and the closing of my thread of kindness does seem a bit, well, curious, amongst other things. Not My Dog. Rob Quote Link to comment
+deimos444 Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 causality Did you really mean causality and, if so, what does that mean in the context of your message? Quote Link to comment
ArtMan Posted September 4, 2005 Author Share Posted September 4, 2005 causality Did you really mean causality and, if so, what does that mean in the context of your message? I think he probably meant "casually." Spelling is one of the first things to go in these forums (but it's far worse in the Blackberry and mobile phone emails one gets). -ArtMan- Quote Link to comment
Max Cacher Posted September 5, 2005 Share Posted September 5, 2005 Sometimes it both Max BTW I sent a detailed note to the OP for the reason when I closed the topic at that time Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.