+LaNoRy Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 I have just thought of a new feature, and I just thought it would be a good idea. I really like the idea of where you can pick a distance (within 10km, 100km, etc.) and the app will pick a cache randomly for you. I just thought it would be a good idea. That’s all. 1 2 Quote Link to comment
+Max and 99 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Just close your eyes and point on the map. 5 1 Quote Link to comment
+Sottiwotti Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 Yeah, sounds cool. A sort of "surprise me" feature 1 Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 13 hours ago, LaNoRy said: I have just thought of a new feature, and I just thought it would be a good idea. I really like the idea of where you can pick a distance (within 10km, 100km, etc.) and the app will pick a cache randomly for you. I just thought it would be a good idea. That’s all. I am reminded of the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button on the Google search page... 2 1 Quote Link to comment
+cerberus1 Posted January 29 Share Posted January 29 22 hours ago, LaNoRy said: I have just thought of a new feature, and I just thought it would be a good idea. I really like the idea of where you can pick a distance (within 10km, 100km, etc.) and the app will pick a cache randomly for you. I just thought it would be a good idea. With my luck, the "app" would pick all low D/T caches that I wouldn't do even when the other 2/3rds was a FTF hound... Quote Link to comment
+Mausebiber Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 On 1/28/2024 at 11:13 PM, LaNoRy said: pick a distance (within 10km, 100km, etc.) and the app will pick a cache Do you really think it is a good idea to drive 100 Km (one way) just for this random selected cache? 1 1 Quote Link to comment
+barefootjeff Posted February 5 Share Posted February 5 6 hours ago, Mausebiber said: Do you really think it is a good idea to drive 100 Km (one way) just for this random selected cache? I've often travelled that distance for just one cache, most recently for GCA8WQY at Sandy Hollow in the upper Hunter Valley (150km in a straight line but 220km by road). I also own a cache (GC9ZM7G) that's a similar distance from home. Almost all my caching now is more than 40km from home (straight line) as new caches closer than that are a rare treat these days. I'll use public transport (trains, buses and ferries) if I can but often that's not an option. Before retiring, my daily commute to the office was over 40km each way (5km bike ride, 37km train trip and 1.4km walk). Distances don't mean much here because everything is a long way away. 1 Quote Link to comment
+Mausebiber Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 19 hours ago, barefootjeff said: Distances don't mean much here because everything is a long way away. Yes, this is right for you, but there is much more than Australia. You have about 0,025 Cache / km² while we have about 3,35 Cache / km². If I travel 100 km I will pass about 500 Cache. But this is not the point. None has to follow this new Idea, you could just ignore it. The statement was "I just thought it would be a good idea" and I don't agree. 1 Quote Link to comment
+LaNoRy Posted February 10 Author Share Posted February 10 On 2/5/2024 at 6:22 AM, Mausebiber said: Do you really think it is a good idea to drive 100 Km (one way) just for this random selected cache? I am just giving an example, that’s all. Quote Link to comment
+x7Kevin Posted February 11 Share Posted February 11 This would be a fun feature, even if I didn't want to find the cache it chose it could help me choose an area to go that day. Some type of similar feature that showed me areas or directions that I've cached the least, or that there's the highest density of unfound caches could be interesting too. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.