Just Replace the Log

[Dulce-Joy]

I would accept any example. None has been forthcoming.

When was the last time L0ne.R replied to any of your posts?

 

If you're on someone's ignored users list, then a reply may not be forthcoming.

+1

[+noncentric]

In particular, denigrating a group for not meeting someone's standards, in a normal discussion, would entail some demonstration that the person doing the criticism would meet the same standards they set for others.

Yep, unless that person is a hypocrite and/or doesn't mind others having the opinion that they are. The things I hear from hypocrites doesn't hold much water with me.

[knowschad]

Not being able to feeling the need to prove it to someone else's satisfaction doesn't make their opinion wrong.

 

In a normal discussion (remember, this is a discussion, not a posting of random opinions) smearing a large group of cache owners with a judgement such as "they are not responsible cache owners" generally requires some support.

 

In particular, denigrating a group for not meeting someone's standards, in a normal discussion, would entail some demonstration that the person doing the criticism would meet the same standards they set for others.

 

We are not talking about the validity of someone's experience. At least I am not. I am discussing the validity of someone's smearing of a wide group of cachers.

 

OK, I will accept that that is your reality. But then, let me ask you this: Why is it you feel that group of cache owners need you to come to their defense? Do you feel that you are being put into that box with them? Are you defending others, or are you defending yourself?

 

Personally, I do believe that we (some of us, perhaps even most of us) are indeed talking about the validity of someone's experience.

[Rock Chalk]

Thread has gone way off the rails. Closed.