Jump to content

datum conversion


Recommended Posts

I am looking for a cache in which the coords are given in the normal WSG 84 datum which leads to a bogus site. To find the real cache site the datum has to be converted to Old Hawaiian datum and searched with it. I have the Old Hawaiian datum as a choice on my eTrex Vista C but changing to it does not alter the obviously incorrect location.

How do I use the datum selections in the GPSr to convert from one to another?

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment

I would think that you need to switch to the other datum first, then create the waypoint at the given location and then change the datum back to WGS84. Looking at the waypoint's coordinates should then give you the converted numbers. Disclaimer: untested.

Link to comment

I would think that you need to switch to the other datum first, then create the waypoint at the given location and then change the datum back to WGS84. Looking at the waypoint's coordinates should then give you the converted numbers. Disclaimer: untested.

 

That is how I would do it.

me too.

Link to comment

I would think that you need to switch to the other datum first, then create the waypoint at the given location and then change the datum back to WGS84. Looking at the waypoint's coordinates should then give you the converted numbers. Disclaimer: untested.

 

That is how I would do it.

me too.

 

Not me. I wrote my own datum converter for that cache. Used the 3-parameter Molodensky transform. Worked great. I don't know how many GPS units have the Old Hawaiian datum in them.

Link to comment

All of my 60 series have the Old Hawaiian Data in them, as well as the SporTrak and Meridian.

 

A quick test shows that there is about 489 yards difference between WGS 84 and the O Hw. That's a bunch. Think I better run that again!

Link to comment

Thanks everybody - we found it today.

 

What worked was to enter the given coords into the Old Hawaiian datum setup on the eTrex then change to the usual WSG 84 format. The result was a different set of coords that led us to the prize. All just like dfx and others suggested. And yes the distance from the WSG 84 bogus site to the Old Hawaiian find was certainly hundreds of meters.

 

I had tried a NADCON (NAD 27 to NAD 83) conversion app but the results were quite a bit off. I assume that is because the Old Hawaiian datum is not exactly the same as NAD 27 even though it was stated to be derived from it.

Edited by frefel
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...