Jump to content

What does this mean?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't believe the article is entirely clear. For example, during the Bush era, there was a proposal in the works to designate additional Federal lands for timber production to fund public schools in areas where the tax base is insufficient to keep schools open. It would be good to see an objective explanation of the article.

Posted

President Bush opened up some federal lands for development. President Obama would like to return those lands to the protected wilderness status that they had prior to the Bush administration.

Posted
I'd rather have forests that we can't cache in than no forests for our children and grandchildren.

Black and white logic.

 

I'd rather have forests that we can cache in. And for the most part, that's what we have. (Speaking for Canada here; come visit sometime.)

Posted
I'd rather have forests that we can't cache in than no forests for our children and grandchildren.

Black and white logic.

 

I'd rather have forests that we can cache in. And for the most part, that's what we have. (Speaking for Canada here; come visit sometime.)

+1 I am tried of going out into the back country only to find that some bureucrat has decided that I can no longer go there and declared the area a wilderness. Most of the new wilderness areas do not meet the original purpose of the original wilderness act.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...