+greiol Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 when checking my found mysts it says I found 502 mysts. If I scroll to the last page with the ">>" link everything seems fine since there are 26 pages and only 2 caches on the last page. Normally a page holds 20 caches so 20*25+2 = 502. So far so good. But if I have a closer look at page 2, there are only 19 caches listed. which one is missing? where has it gone? and why? Link to comment
+Chrysalides Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 I guess it's a mystery. *cough* Sorry. Was a mystery accidentally logged as found twice? Link to comment
OpinioNate Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 You are probably ignoring one of the caches that would normally appear on that page. Check your Ignore Bookmark List. Link to comment
+greiol Posted April 6, 2010 Author Share Posted April 6, 2010 (edited) Chrysalides was right. GC1T8PY was logged twice. I deleted one of the logs and find count went down to 501 and every page had 20 caches on it. Then i started a little experiment and logged one of my archived caches 20 times as found. and the result was: so it seems if you are looking for caches you logged as found more than once check for pages containing less than 20 caches and you found it. Now I will have to delete the 20 logs again, but I hope I could demonstrate the effect and show how to reproduce it. the lackeys may decide if this form of presentation is a feature or a bug. thanks for your help Edited April 6, 2010 by greiol Link to comment
+eigengott Posted April 6, 2010 Share Posted April 6, 2010 You are probably ignoring one of the caches that would normally appear on that page. Even if this were true, the pagination code violates heavily on the principle of least astonishment. It should paginate the result/view, not the underlying data model. BTW: Any chance to get bookmark pagination fixed? I got the feeling that it suffers from the same issue. Link to comment
+Lil Devil Posted April 7, 2010 Share Posted April 7, 2010 the lackeys may decide if this form of presentation is a feature or a bug. I'm not a lackey, but I see this as a feature. Link to comment
Recommended Posts