+DiKri Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 I have a problem opening some of my pocket query's giving following error: Server Error in '/' Application. Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Source Error: An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace: [NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.] Geocaching.UI.pocket_gcquery.ShowQueryInfo() +2868 Geocaching.UI.pocket_gcquery.Page_UserLoggedIn(Object sender, EventArgs e) +1775 Geocaching.UI.WebformBase.IsLoggedIn() +1088 Geocaching.UI.pocket_gcquery.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +318 System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +67 System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +35 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +744 Any idea ??? Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted January 30, 2007 Share Posted January 30, 2007 How were you trying to open it? With what program? Link to comment
+DiKri Posted January 30, 2007 Author Share Posted January 30, 2007 How were you trying to open it? With what program? On the geocaching.com website with the overview of pocket queries. Then clicking on the name of the query. It's a problem with the website, not the result of the query. Strange enough, the query itself runs and gives the expected results, but you can't open the definition of it. If you copy the query, the copied result gives the same error. Link to comment
+Bolingbrook Joe Posted January 31, 2007 Share Posted January 31, 2007 I occasionally get a similar error when trying to download a GPX file. GCJ807 is one example. Admitedly, it's archived, but other archived caches don't exhibit this problem. Link to comment
Recommended Posts