Before and After photos

[+Shorelander]

I'm sure that it's not that uncommon, but I was going over my last couple of week's finds and found that someone had found NG0244 a few months ago. (For some reason I hadn't checked the GC.com log before I went out.) I went back today to get an "after photo" from the same angle:

 

Before

After

 

I marked it destroyed for GC.com and I'm planning to log "Not Found" with the NGS. How often do you come across something like this?

[+Butano]

A while back I went looking for this one, but it had been reset with another one. Both are still in the database as active, with the same exact coordinates.

But this one has a similar condition to the one that you found. Well, the whole bridge was destroyed and not replaced.

[+Harry Dolphin]

Shorelander, I would present that one to NGS as destroyed. Or, at least present it to Deb.

I know that this one has been destroyed: KV0276. Last time I drove by, the bridge had been destroyed, and rebuilt. I just haven't stopped by to take a new photo. Not a good distance shot, but it's on the shoulder of 1&9 in Lincoln Park in Jersey City.

[68-eldo]

I'm sure that it's not that uncommon, but I was going over my last couple of week's finds and found that someone had found NG0244 a few months ago. (For some reason I hadn't checked the GC.com log before I went out.) I went back today to get an "after photo" from the same angle:

 

Before

After

 

I marked it destroyed for GC.com and I'm planning to log "Not Found" with the NGS. How often do you come across something like this?

 

Shorelander,

Are you sure it is gone? It could be under a thin layer of concrete. A chisel and hammer could bring out the mark and make it useable.

 

A metal detector would tell you it if it was there or not.

[+Intermountain Angler]

I'm sure that it's not that uncommon, but I was going over my last couple of week's finds and found that someone had found NG0244 a few months ago. (For some reason I hadn't checked the GC.com log before I went out.) I went back today to get an "after photo" from the same angle:

 

Before

After

 

I marked it destroyed for GC.com and I'm planning to log "Not Found" with the NGS. How often do you come across something like this?

 

Shorelander,

Are you sure it is gone? It could be under a thin layer of concrete. A chisel and hammer could bring out the mark and make it useable.

 

A metal detector would tell you it if it was there or not.

I agree with 68-eldo, that mark just might still be there. personally I would try to find out for sure before filing a report with Deb

[+GEO*Trailblazer 1]

Yes it (appears) to be under the thin layer of cement.

Like stated a metal detector will tell you for sure.

I would not take very much away from the patch they have done,it may start the erosion again.

[foxtrot_xray]

I wouldn't worry about erosion too much, I mean, in the before and after, a crack above and to the left of the pipe has gotten noticably larger. It's going to continue to cruble away at any rate. Depending on how 'thin' a layer is, I'd chip it away.. (If possible to do and not get questioned by police or anything..)

 

FOx.

[+Shorelander]

Well, I went back and took a look. Not having a metal detector, I had to try using a magnet (which, I determined, wouldn't work even if the disk was there) and tapping it with a hammer and listening to the sounds. No luck on either. So I'll change my original log on GC to a DNF.