+PDOP's Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 Received a [GEO] Notify: cache-advance published A Big Leap Forward - YLHDAB email for this cache this morning but receive the "Sorry, you cannot view this cache listing until it has been approved." when I use the link in the email. Link to comment
+WeightMan Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 I've noticed that happening a few times. Normally it will show up in a few minutes. Link to comment
+PDOP's Posted October 1, 2005 Author Share Posted October 1, 2005 I've noticed that happening a few times. Normally it will show up in a few minutes. Hmmm. From the e Sent Saturday, October 1, 2005 0:20 am and Log Date: 9/30/2005 Published Still shows as not being approved so something else must be going on here. Link to comment
Moun10Bike Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 Chances are the cache was initially approved in error, then immediately retracted. The notification mail was triggered upon the approval and in the meantime the status of the cache changed. Link to comment
+WeightMan Posted October 1, 2005 Share Posted October 1, 2005 That should generate a "Retract Listing" email though, shouldn't it? I have that checked on my Insta-Notify subscriptions and have yet to see one even though a few caches have shown up as not yet approved. The only two I have checked are the publish and retract boxes. Link to comment
Moun10Bike Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yes, retract listing should generate a notification. What you might be seeing is the web site caching web pages (which it does to help performance) - the cache might be approved, but the unapproved status is what is cached. Normally refreshing your browser corrects this. If it continues to show up as unapproved, then there might be another issue. Link to comment
+PDOP's Posted October 2, 2005 Author Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yes, retract listing should generate a notification. Didn't receive that What you might be seeing is the web site caching web pages (which it does to help performance) - the cache might be approved, but the unapproved status is what is cached. Normally refreshing your browser corrects this. . Have tried refreshing several times but no change. It's also not showing up in a search for unfound caches in my area. What do you see? If it continues to show up as unapproved, then there might be another issue Must be. Link to comment
Moun10Bike Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 PDOP's, I have confirmed that your issue was an approval that was retracted. Perhaps the retract notification is not working. Link to comment
+Ambrosia Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 I had that happen with a new cache. I tried refreshing it for a while, but it never came up as approved. A bit later the cache owner posted a note about it being approved in our local forum. I checked and it had been posted. Not sure what the issue was with that one, but it's the only time I've seen it. Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 Yes, retract listing should generate a notification. Didn't receive that What you might be seeing is the web site caching web pages (which it does to help performance) - the cache might be approved, but the unapproved status is what is cached. Normally refreshing your browser corrects this. . Have tried refreshing several times but no change. It's also not showing up in a search for unfound caches in my area. What do you see? If it continues to show up as unapproved, then there might be another issue Must be. Did you check to box to receive retraction notices? Link to comment
+PDOP's Posted October 2, 2005 Author Share Posted October 2, 2005 Did you check to box to receive retraction notices? Had to double check that and no I had not ticked that check box which explains why I didn't receive the retraction notice. Thanks. Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted October 2, 2005 Share Posted October 2, 2005 Did you check to box to receive retraction notices? Had to double check that and no I had not ticked that check box which explains why I didn't receive the retraction notice. Thanks. Mystery solved. And all this time, I thought it was ol' man Higgens, trying to scare people away from the abandoned amusement park while he searched for the hidden treasure. I'll never forget his last words, before the police dragged him away, "I would have found it too, if it weren't for those dang, meddling kids!" Link to comment
+PDOP's Posted October 3, 2005 Author Share Posted October 3, 2005 Mystery solved. But no the mystery remains. Why was the cache published then withdrawn? Will it ever see the light of day? Has ol' man Higgens made off with it? Link to comment
+Hemlock Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Why was the cache published then withdrawn?Accidents happen. Will it ever see the light of day?Not in the original location. Link to comment
robertlipe Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 HDOP, in less opaque terms - and with no inside information at all about this specific case - the "withdraw" thing appears to be reserved for "oopsie" listings - things that were approved but that probably shouldn't have been. They're relatively uncommon. For example, if I submit a cache that's under an interstate, over a railroad track, and filled with heroin laced stamps, but it gets approved (work with me - I'm exaggerating for a reason) there are three ways to "undo" it. A) Temp disable it - that won't work in this case becuase I, the evil cache placer, have the power to un-disable it. B ) Archive it - but that won't work in this case because you can look at my profile or guess the GC# and get the coords of the evil box. C ) Retract the listing - which actually will work here as it returns the cache to it's pre-approved state, ensuring that others can't find the coords for the end of the rainbow. Less contrived examples could include where the placer claimed to have landowner permission but did not. Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 There may be another reason as well. It could just be something that the owner needs to fix on the cache page, but it shouldn't be viewable until the fix is made. If it's just disabled, people can still see it and even log it. If it's archived, the owner is locked out from making any changes, so they're unable to make the fix. So the Retract option takes it out of public view, but still gives the owner the ability to edit the page. Link to comment
robertlipe Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Can a cache owner retract thier own listing? Isn't that reserved for admins? Link to comment
+The Leprechauns Posted October 3, 2005 Share Posted October 3, 2005 Can a cache owner retract thier own listing? Isn't that reserved for admins? No, and yes. Link to comment
Recommended Posts