+Renegade Knight Posted August 23, 2004 Posted August 23, 2004 (edited) Agreed. At this point, I don't intend on renewing my "premium" membership, or spending any more money on geocaching.com items.<BR><BR>Thankfully there are alternatives.<BR><BR>George That explains the MIA status. Edited August 23, 2004 by Renegade Knight Quote
+mtn-man Posted August 23, 2004 Posted August 23, 2004 On virtual caches we are fairly consistent. I have to disagree with this statement. -WJ Feel free to disagree. But... if you are going to bump something out of this old topic, the appropriated posts to do that to would be this one: Re: Virtual Caches If you really want to enter the murky realm of virtual caches, ask first and post second. Consider that your virtual cache will most likely not get listed. That way you are prepared for disappointment. and this one: I'm wildly sober about this. Physical caches are the basis of the activity. Virtual caches were created due to the inaccessability of caching in areas that discourage it. If you must create a virtual cache its best to bring the idea up before doing the research. Expect a no first and a yes in extraordinary situations. I hate it has to be blunt but that's the fact, Jack WJ, you would have done well to have taken that advise. You probably would not harbor so much angst if you did. Quote
+The Leprechauns Posted August 23, 2004 Posted August 23, 2004 mtn-man has quoted the posts that were linked to in some more recent discussions of virtual caches. In response to ju66l3r's valid question, my theory is that the person who bumped the thread did so after reading it because of following a recent link to it. Quote
+mtn-man Posted August 23, 2004 Posted August 23, 2004 (edited) On virtual caches we are fairly consistent. I have to disagree with this statement. -WJ By the way, looking back, that was taken slightly out of context. The full text was: I think the approver are fairly consistent. We are not perfect and never will be. On virtual caches we are fairly consistent. I, like Mopar, would like to (know) which cache you are talking about to see if the cache is grandfathered. Read the guidelines and if you have a question then post your idea for a cache in the forums. I'm sure you will get lots of opinions about it. Those comments were directed to the OP. I never said we never make mistakes. How about we look at something you said in another recent topic about virtual caches: You will hear from me no more on this specific subject. Looks like I will have to disagree with that statement. This topic is evidence of that being a bogus statement. Here you are again continuing to go on about virtual caches. You even started a new topic to boot. Edited August 23, 2004 by mtn-man Quote
+Wily Javelina Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 Nice try mtn-man, but no cigar. Here you go, off again, with arguments full of air and out of context. Your propaganda machine is just not up to snuff. I am sorry if you are still sore… -WJ Quote
+CO Admin Posted August 30, 2004 Posted August 30, 2004 Ok you two take it private. E-mail or PM I dont care but dont air it here. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.