+Flyphishing Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 I realize that caches have to be placed at least 528ft. apart. I would like to place a Traditional Cache about 100 ft. from the starting point of a Mystery Cache whose GZ is about 3 miles away. Since the actual cache location of the Mystery Cache is more than 528ft. can I place my Traditional Cache? Thanks!! Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Bogus posted coordinates for mystery/puzzle caches are considered virtual stages. Virtual stages are allowed to be within 528ft/161m of other geocaches. Here are some Help Center articles: Waypoints and stages Check for minimum distance 1 Quote Link to comment
+Flyphishing Posted July 31, 2018 Author Share Posted July 31, 2018 Yes!! Thank You!! Quote Link to comment
+Max and 99 Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 3 hours ago, Flyphishing said: I would like to place a Traditional Cache about 100 ft. from the starting point of a Mystery Cache whose GZ is about 3 miles away. Not less than 2? Quote Link to comment
+hzoi Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 4 hours ago, Max and 99 said: 8 hours ago, Flyphishing said: I would like to place a Traditional Cache about 100 ft. from the starting point of a Mystery Cache whose GZ is about 3 miles away. Not less than 2? Perhaps an older cache. The 2-mile rule was not made retroactive when it was introduced. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 1 hour ago, hzoi said: Perhaps an older cache. The 2-mile rule was not made retroactive when it was introduced. The 2-mile limit for Mystery caches was introduced in the November 2003 version of the listing guidelines: Quote Unless a good reason otherwise can be provided, the posted coordinates should be no more than 1-2 miles away from the true cache location. This allows the cache to show up on the proper vicinity searches and to keep the mileage of Travel Bugs that find their way into the cache reasonably correct. In the January 2011 version of the listing guidelines, any "wiggle room" was removed by the deletion of the words "Unless a good reason otherwise can be provided." 1 Quote Link to comment
+hzoi Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 3 hours ago, Keystone said: 4 hours ago, hzoi said: Perhaps an older cache. The 2-mile rule was not made retroactive when it was introduced. The 2-mile limit for Mystery caches was introduced in the November 2003 version of the listing guidelines: Quote Unless a good reason otherwise can be provided, the posted coordinates should be no more than 1-2 miles away from the true cache location. This allows the cache to show up on the proper vicinity searches and to keep the mileage of Travel Bugs that find their way into the cache reasonably correct. In the January 2011 version of the listing guidelines, any "wiggle room" was removed by the deletion of the words "Unless a good reason otherwise can be provided." I stand corrected. How strictly was that enforced, though? I can think of more than one post-2003 mystery cache that was over 2 miles from the listed coords; the Virginia Delorme Challenge, for example, was published in 2006 with bogus coords almost 200 miles from the final. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 I moved an Off Topic question into its own thread in the Benchmarking forum section. Quote Link to comment
Keystone Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 3 hours ago, hzoi said: I stand corrected. How strictly was that enforced, though? I can think of more than one post-2003 mystery cache that was over 2 miles from the listed coords; the Virginia Delorme Challenge, for example, was published in 2006 with bogus coords almost 200 miles from the final. A 2006 DeLorme Challenge predates the tightening of the guidelines in 2011. The reviewer at the time may have felt that there was a good reason to make an exception. Also, many reviewers are dogs. 1 Quote Link to comment
+hzoi Posted August 1, 2018 Share Posted August 1, 2018 13 hours ago, Keystone said: A 2006 DeLorme Challenge predates the tightening of the guidelines in 2011. The reviewer at the time may have felt that there was a good reason to make an exception. Also, many reviewers are dogs. Got it. I think I took the elimination of the wiggle room as the imposition of the rule; clearly not. Alles klar. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.