Jump to content

A web cam completed


ayrbrain

Recommended Posts

Back in Nov last year we were in Melbourne Australia and managed a few caches. One of the ones I completed was Fedcam in Federation Square .melbourne. I have just been looking at my stastistics and cannot see any mention of the web cam on my chart. It is counted as a find in my numbers found though. Just wondered if this is counted as a web cam one as It was to be completed using the web cam, which I managed to do, and logged it. Thank you for any replies/help. Ps I hope this is the correct area to post this. <_<

Link to comment

GCK4EG was published as Mystery type, not a webcam type.

 

It looks to have always been something of a webcam. But the cache owner choose Mystery, and the reviewer published that way - which is also okay, as Mystery type is a catch-all. It's a bit different in design from the usual webcam - you take a picture, using your own camera, of your image on the big screen.

 

In any case, you're credited with the type on the page, which is Mystery.

Edited by Isonzo Karst
Link to comment

Back in Nov last year we were in Melbourne Australia and managed a few caches. One of the ones I completed was Fedcam in Federation Square .melbourne. I have just been looking at my stastistics and cannot see any mention of the web cam on my chart. It is counted as a find in my numbers found though. Just wondered if this is counted as a web cam one as It was to be completed using the web cam, which I managed to do, and logged it. Thank you for any replies/help. Ps I hope this is the correct area to post this. <_<

 

The cache was published as an "Unknown" type 8.gif

 

It wasn't published as a "webcam" type 11.gif

 

 

B.

Link to comment

GCK4EG was published as Mystery type, not a webcam type.

 

It looks to have always been something of a webcam. But the cache owner choose Mystery, and the reviewer published that way - which is also okay, as Mystery type is a catch-all. It's a bit different in design from the usual webcam - you take a picture, using your own camera, of your image on the big screen.

It was okay for the reviewer to publish it that way because Additional Logging Requirements were allowed back in 2004. Today...not so much. Since ALRs weren't grandfathered, I'm a bit surprised that this cache still requires a photo be taken and uploaded.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...