+hidenseek581 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 I went out today to find a cache, and when I couldn't find it I searched recent logs, several of which mentioned it was an offset cache. One said it was offset to the NE. I have no idea what this means. Please help. Quote Link to comment
jholly Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 The cache is located at some distance by some distance from ground zero, hence offset from ground zero. Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 According to Geocache Types: "An offset cache (where you go to a location and get hints to the actual cache) is considered a Multi-Cache." Sometimes, the "hints" have been a distance and bearing from an object at ground zero. Sometimes, the "hints" have been values to be added/subtracted from the decimal minutes of the posted coordinates. Sometimes the "hints" have been something else. But a log that says the cache is "offset to the NE" seems to indicate "soft" (that is, bad) coordinates on a traditional cache. Quote Link to comment
+hidenseek581 Posted March 27, 2012 Author Share Posted March 27, 2012 Here are the comments about the cache, that I thought meant it was an offset cache. Do "official" offset caches usually say how much they are offset? I can't tell if this is a "official" offset, or comments mean that it is just "off". Description: Micro cache is offset from the center of the redwood grove but reachable from within the park. From recent logs: Found with help of some prior logs. According to our compass, offset direction is NE. AND ANOTHER: I'd already DNF'd at least three times before (typically due to not realizing it's an offset cache) niraD - you may know this cache: The Forgotten Flying Redwoods in PA. Quote Link to comment
+terrkan78 Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 If it's listed as a traditional cache (and not listed as a multi-cache), then it's not an official offset. With the site down right now, I can't look up the cache in question, but my guess is it's not an official offset multi-cache. A typical official offset multi-cache would tell you explicitly in the description that you're going to this location not to find the actual cache, but to find information that you will use (usually in solving a puzzle that's in the description) which will give you the coordinates to the actual cache. Some really old caches are grandfathered in with wrong coordinates - for example I found one where the coordinates provided were for a trailhead parking lot, and then buried deep in the description were the coordinates to the actual cache. I suppose that could also be called an "offset" cache (albeit not official). Quote Link to comment
+The A-Team Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 (edited) If it's listed as a traditional cache (and not listed as a multi-cache), then it's not an official offset. With the site down right now, I can't look up the cache in question, but my guess is it's not an official offset multi-cache. Now that the site is back up, we can see that it is indeed an "offset" listed as a Traditional. One log mentions it being 65 feet away from the coordinates. It looks like many have had problems finding this one due to the mis-leading cache type. The owner really needs to update the coordinates to point to the cache. The way it is right now, it's just confusing people. ETA: Also, with fully 20% of the logs being DNFs on what sounds like a fairly easy find, you'd think the owner would realize there was something wrong with their cache. Edited March 27, 2012 by The A-Team Quote Link to comment
+JesandTodd Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 http://coord.info/GCGKEH Agreed. It's incorrectly listed as a traditional. Quote Link to comment
+niraD Posted March 27, 2012 Share Posted March 27, 2012 Yeah, I found that one a few years ago. Upon rereading my log, it looks like the cache isn't really a traditional cache, as traditional caches are currently understood. However, it was hidden in 2003, and it isn't the only "traditional" cache from back then that wouldn't be listed as a traditional cache today. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.