+capytone Posted July 2, 2008 Posted July 2, 2008 we are so new to gcing we have only found them by map. but we're hooked. i posted on another board that ordered a triton 300 and was told... "Hmmm, you might want to check the GPS and Technology forum and read a bit about the Triton. To put it simply, it has had very poor reviews from a lot of users." even though it is on it's way.... did i make a mistake? thanks capytone Quote
+Lasagna Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 Every GPSr model has it's own set of unique quirks and advantages ... it all depends on how you plan to use it and what you expect from it. Having nothing prior to this, you may well find the Triton to be fine for your needs. It will, at a minimum do what you need it to do in order to cache -- and that is point the way to a programmed set of coordinate. It's all those other features as you get into caching that you may or may not be happy with about the Triton including satellte reception/coverage, storage capacity, extra navigation features, etc. Personally, I wouldn't have bought a Triton -- but I am an admitted Garmin-biased individual. So, in short, if you like the price you paid and find it capable of getting you to the caches you choose to seek -- then you did fine. Quote
+storm180 Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 I actually owned a triton 2000 for a short period before I returned it. Nothing but problems for me and the support was really lacking. My major issues were the lockups and how sluggish it operated. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.