+Xangxa Posted March 10, 2005 Share Posted March 10, 2005 I’ve just posted an article explaining a setup that automatically processes Pocket Queries as they arrive in my mailbox. I’m using MS Outlook’s inbox rules and a few other tools to extract the GPX from the ZIP file, rename the GPX to match the PQ, stage it for automatic synchronization to my Pocket PC (for paperless caching), import it into a GSAK database, and export from GSAK a few filtered subsets (also staged for synchronization with my PPC). GSAK version 6 is expected to have POP3 email support. But this setup extends beyond GSAK, is available today, or can be used independently of GSAK. The setup requires editing batch files, so it does require some basic computer skills. If you fit this audience, you may enjoy the article “Automating Inbound Pocket Queries” at http://www.craiggiven.com/gc_auto.htm Quote Link to comment
+Sputnik 57 Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 (edited) GSAK version 6 is expected to have POP3 email support. In the famous words of Radar O'Reilly, "Wait for it." 5.2 will be here before you know it. POP3 and Gmail support is awesome. Edit: No disrespect to the OP. I haven't tried Xanxa's link, so please feel free to check it out. Edited March 11, 2005 by Sputnik 57 Quote Link to comment
+Pasha Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Sounds like you have first-hand knowledge. I'm waiting for POP support to be added to GSAK as well, since I have my PQs sent to my Gmail account. The only non-automated part of my paperless setup now is getting the attachments from Gmail. Quote Link to comment
+ClydeE Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Sounds like you have first-hand knowledge. I'm waiting for POP support to be added to GSAK as well, since I have my PQs sent to my Gmail account. The only non-automated part of my paperless setup now is getting the attachments from Gmail. You have mail Quote Link to comment
+NightPilot Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Well, anything that requires Lookout is something that I'll pass on. Thanks anyway. Quote Link to comment
+Pasha Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 Xangxa's process undoubtedly works well for him, though only small parts of it are probably transferrable to someone without that specific hardware combination. I can't help but think of all the work that went into it. There's a sort of natural evolution of processes for things like this; a variety of file formats and hardware are available, someone tries to put them together and ends up coding a little utility to automate some of it, someone else uses that utility in their own program that does something else, yet another person ends up writing a "kitchen sink" solution that incorporates everything that came before and then some, and eventually Microsoft comes along and buys it all and incorporates it into Windows. The process ends up driving itself when you think about it. That's my Meta-Code Thought of the Day, free to everyone. Quote Link to comment
+caderoux Posted March 11, 2005 Share Posted March 11, 2005 I've also got a similar home-grown automation, but Clyde's solution is going to take it to more people by making it mail agent independent and open to everyone. Quote Link to comment
+Xangxa Posted March 11, 2005 Author Share Posted March 11, 2005 I can't help but think of all the work that went into it. The hard work was in explaining it. Building it was quite easy, while building the web page to document the setup took the longest. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.