lowracer Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 I've had a cache waiting for approval for a few days now. Has everyone gone home for the holidays already? This anticipation (whether this is going to get approved or rejected) is killing me. Hell even N&vic@che hasn't acted on it yet! Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 (edited) I'd chalk it up to being a holiday weekend. If they don't get to it by Wednesday, email your local approver. Edited December 1, 2003 by Team GPSaxophone Link to comment
Keystone Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Lowracer, it took me a bit of searching, but I finally found your cache submission from 11/30. It does not appear in the approval queue, because you have both archived your cache and temporarily disabled it. The cache must be listed as "active" and "unarchived" in order to appear in the approval queue. I have fixed this so your cache is now in the queue. I am confident that this is user error as the audit log for your members-only cache shows that nobody but you and me has viewed the page. You should hear from the reviewer for your area in due course now. Link to comment
lowracer Posted December 1, 2003 Author Share Posted December 1, 2003 Thanks for the replies. I have a few event caches that never saw the light of day due to initially not being approved, so I have been recycling them into other types of caches. They are still archived from the initial rejection, so usually I have to email somebody to get them unarchived. Fortunately I'm out of those types of caches now so I can just use the normal method of reporting a cache. Thanks for the assist! -mark. Link to comment
+Team GPSaxophone Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 It's best to create a new page for each cache, not recycle archived caches. Link to comment
Jeremy Posted December 1, 2003 Share Posted December 1, 2003 Please don't recycle cache listings. It confuses people who logged them in the past. Some of the veteran caches get confused when their event turns into a virtual cache, etc. We have plenty of cache numbers to use. Link to comment
lowracer Posted December 2, 2003 Author Share Posted December 2, 2003 I haven't been recycling caches that ever saw the light of day, so no one would be confused by finding them with new names and types. These caches were originally rejected, archived, and no one ever saw them or posted to them. As I've currently used up my supply of this class of caches, I won't be reusing any in the future. Too much work to get them visible to the approvers anyway... Link to comment
+OurWoods Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 I've been waiting almost a week now for 2 new caches to be approved. One is simple 2/2 and one is a multi, I posted the coords for each stage and everything. I waited 5 days now and have listed it on navicache.com where it was approved in only a day. Link to comment
Jeremy Posted December 7, 2003 Share Posted December 7, 2003 There was only one cache in the queue (a multi) - I went ahead and approved it for you. Link to comment
Recommended Posts