NetDep Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 I was curious, and nearly certain, that someone here could answer a question about determining distance between two coords. If I had been at S 34 54.952/W 055 02.791 and wanted to go to S 34 51.356/W 056 01.435 what would the distance be? I can not find the usual resources beause the two coords are in Uruguay, S. America. The first is a virtual that I was at a little while ago and the second is the only cache located in Uruguay (but located in/near Montevideo where I may be returning) so I would like a rough distance. If I return and the cache is still placed I would like to try to find it. Thanks in advance for anyone's help. I have previously asked a rather odd question and got help right away. By the way - I would not ask if the answer was *clearly* obvious - I try to solve those myself before posting. Take care & HAPPY CACHING!! Does the walker choose the path, or the path, the walker? - Sabriel, by Garth Nix Quote Link to comment
+CWL Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 You can get the distance from EZ GPS also this place is suppost to work: http://grapevine.abe.msstate.edu/~fto/calculator/converte.html There are also programs you can download. I have a few at home my self. Quote Link to comment
+MacBWizard Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 When I want to see the distance between two waypoints I create a route between the points on the gps itself. Just look at the total route distance. It is the easiest way if you don't want to mess with programs or websites. MacBWizard Quote Link to comment
dave and jaime Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 you could imput both sets of coordinates into your gps or some waypoint manager program (ie easy-gps) and then create a route. by entering the coordinates into my unit i get 89km (50mi). Quote Link to comment
+MaxEntropy Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 Thanks for the flashback. It's been a long time since spherical trig. I had to search this one. D = 1.852 * 60 * ARCOS ( SIN(L1) * SIN(L2) + COS(L1) * COS(L2) * COS(DG)) L1 = latitude at the first point (degrees) L2 = latitude at the second point (degrees) G1 = longitude at the first point (degrees) G2 = longitude at the second point (degrees) DG = longitude of the second point minus longitude of the first point (degrees) DL = latitude of the second point minus latitude of the first point (degrees) D = computed distance (km) Definitions South latitudes are negative East longitudes are positive Great circle distance is the shortest distance between two points on a sphere. This coincides with the circumference of a circle which passes through both points and the centre of the sphere. Geodesic distance is the shortest distance between two points on a spheroid. Normal section distance is formed by a plane on a spheroid containing a point at one end of the line and the normal of the point at the other end. For all practical purposes, the difference between a normal section and a geodesic distance is insignificant. Note: If your calculator returns the ARCOS result as radians you will have to convert the radians to degrees before multiplying by 60 and 1.852 degrees = (radians/PI)*180, where PI=3.141592654... Mickey Max Entropy More than just a name, a lifestyle. Quote Link to comment
+Markwell Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 or click here - 89.34 km. Markwell Chicago Geocaching Quote Link to comment
+Web-ling Posted January 3, 2003 Share Posted January 3, 2003 quote:Originally posted by MaxEntropy: D = 1.852 * 60 * ARCOS ( SIN(L1) * SIN(L2) + COS(L1) * COS(L2) * COS(DG)) Cool! I've been thinking of adding a function in my Access database where I track my finds to calculate the total distance traveled between caches. Now I don't have to search the forum archives to find the last time someone gave the formula! Thanks! Anyone have a formula to determine the bearing from waypoint A to waypoint B? Quote Link to comment
NetDep Posted January 6, 2003 Author Share Posted January 6, 2003 Thank you all very much. I was curious and now I know. I knew I could count on the forums to get an answer - and an especially helpful website to compute this kind of thing in the future!! Thanks again & HAPPY CACHING!! Does the walker choose the path, or the path, the walker? - Sabriel, by Garth Nix Quote Link to comment
+Markwell Posted January 6, 2003 Share Posted January 6, 2003 ARCOS doesn't work in Access. Try these fields in Access. Lat1=Decimal Degrees Latitude Point 1 Lon1=Decimal Degrees Longitude Point 1 Lat2=Decimal Degrees Latitude Point 2 Lon2=Decimal Degrees Longitude Point 2 Pi: 3.14159265359 DistanceInMiles: (Atn(-(Cos([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Cos([Lat2]*[Pi]/180)*Cos(([Lon2]-[Lon1])*[Pi]/180)+Sin([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Sin([Lat2]*[Pi]/180))/Sqr(-(Cos([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Cos([Lat2]*[Pi]/180)*Cos(([Lon2]-[Lon1])*[Pi]/180)+Sin([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Sin([Lat2]*[Pi]/180))*(Cos([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Cos([Lat2]*[Pi]/180)*Cos(([Lon2]-[Lon1])*[Pi]/180)+Sin([Lat1]*[Pi]/180)*Sin([Lat2]*[Pi]/180))+1))+2*Atn(1))*3959 This is great circle calculation. It can be done with less accuracy using Pythagorean method, but that assumes a flat earth. The closer you are to the poles, the more distorted that is. Also larger distances (>500 miles) become distorted by tenths of a mile. Markwell Chicago Geocaching Quote Link to comment
+Prime Suspect Posted January 6, 2003 Share Posted January 6, 2003 Yeow! Waaay over-complicated. Here's what I use in VB. Esentially the same, but a little easier to follow: DISTANCE = R * ARCCOS((SIN(RAD(LAT1)) * SIN(RAD(LAT2)) + (COS(RAD(LAT1)) * COS(RAD(LAT2)) * COS(LON2 -LON1))) LAT1, LON1, LAT2, LON2 are the latitide and longitude, in decimal degrees format. Multiply the results by 3956.665 for miles, or 6367.52645 for kilometeres. The is the simple calculation, using an average of the polar and equatorial distances. The following functions need to be implemented: Private Function ArcCos(X As Double) As Double On Error Resume Next ArcCos = Atn(-X / Sqr(-X * X + 1)) + 2 * Atn(1) End Function Private Function Rad(X As Double) As Double Rad = X / 45 * Atn(1) End Function You'll notice that the value for Pi doesn't appear to be in the equation anywhere. It's actually incorporated into the RAD function. Since a Radian = X / 180 * Pi, and Pi = 4 * Atn(1), then you can resolve it down to Radian = X / 45 * Atn(1) [This message was edited by Prime Suspect on January 06, 2003 at 03:13 PM.] Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.