Neos2 Posted March 28 Share Posted March 28 (edited) Geocaching HQ has partnered with the Geological Society of America (GSA) to offer some suggestions for EarthCache hiders. The blog has the information, here. Edited March 28 by Neos2 1 2 Quote Link to comment
+peter-tvm Posted March 29 Share Posted March 29 Seems like an reasonable change to me. Strange that it is only a suggestion, meaning it's optional, and nothing that is required. Quote Link to comment
+Awesnap Posted April 1 Share Posted April 1 I agree that this optional guidance is easy to implement. Though I kind of rolled my eyes about the character counts. So I am to assume finders have only a basic knowledge of geology BUT I also should make my UNIQUE cache pages shorter like they ones they made in the olden days. You know, the golden days of earthcaching, back when earthcache creators found an information sign, made people answer questions directly based on the information from that sign (or signs), and maybe have them answer a question about what animals they saw on their visit that day. Or the ones that have a commonly used diagram on their cache page to identify what type of WATERFALL or WETLAND we are looking at. Perhaps the geocaching guidelines and the earthcache guidelines should sync up more to make it clear for BOTH the hiders and the finders. Give clear timelines and procedures for both the hider and cache owner that has to be followed for a before a log gets deleted. It should be clear that if someone makes observations, sends send their logging requirements, that right or wrong, they will not be hasseled or deleted. There should be a timeline that the cache owner has to bring up logging requirement problems, so that one day months down the road they wake up and have a problem with your answers they can't delete you. That If a cache finder has to send answers in, it probably should be required that the cache owner responds. It's polite. Also.. maybe not a requirement, but some language preventing cacheowners from panhandling for more intersting logs or favorite points when they respond to answers. It's just tacky. That if a photo is required on an earthcache, the sender should have the option of emailing, messaging it, or posting it to their logs. Also caches should not require more than one Required photo per earthcache. 2 Quote Link to comment
+thekingofbattle Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 After reading the suggestions...they make sense...but on the handful that I own, I typically do five. Two based on the reading, two based on observation at GZ and a photo. Personally I prefer posting it to the log vice simply sending it to me. It's a clear standard and if the cacher doesnt want their face in it...that's fine, I'll accept it. I see stuff on social media on a regular basis about ECs being "homework caches" and that people routinely despise them. For me...I'm not a fan of multi-caches...so I dont regularly go find them. If you dont like ECs...my philosophy is the same...there's no requirement to find them. Play the game how you wish to play it. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.