+[steelie] Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUESTION: When is a cache small enough that it goes from being a MICRO to a NANO? (Wanting to classify my first cache properly so, looking for size input before I submit it for review. Thanks.) Quote Link to comment
+webscouter. Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 There is no classification of NANO. So when you submit it for review it will be a micro. In the body of the cache page text you can call a cache a nano if it is about the size of a peanut M&M Quote Link to comment
+Wintonian Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 There is no spicific clasification but if you consider it a nano then please state it as a nano on the cache page. Quote Link to comment
+TrailGators Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 If you struggle to get the logbook out and you have to sign the tiny logbook with initials then it is a nano. Quote Link to comment
JJFood Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Nano - About 1cm in diameter. Micro - anything above a nano, below a coffee can. That is the difference Quote Link to comment
+StarBrand Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 yup - offcially nano size does not exist - so choose micro. Say whatever you want in the description about it. Quote Link to comment
+[steelie] Posted March 12, 2009 Author Share Posted March 12, 2009 Thanks everyone. Hearing what people have been saying here and on the Atlantic forum, mine is more like a small micro. It’s about the same diameter as a film canister but shorter. Getting close to placing it. Very excited. Thanks again. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.