+kewfriend Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 No apologies on this one folks: I'm involved in negotiating a formal landowner agreement with those that control a substantial swathe of south west London heathland, a large part of which is SSSI and on which there are already many caches. Our friendly over-worked reviewers are being kept informed and inevitably some of the caches (in the wrong place) will have to be archived to allow the others to survive. As an active keen and thoroughly incompetent cacher, I personally dont want a repeat of the Greenwich Park fiasco so I have come clean to the authorities about the caches, spent an hour with the the Chair and the Chief Exec today, and am supplying them with the assistance of our friendly reviewers any additional info they require. I cannot guarantee that any cache will survive - no one can - as their senior Board has to approve or not approve, but I mindful to be mildly optimistic. The alternate was their 'uncovering' by accident, ructions and their being summarily removed, a likely outcome given the cache density. dont shoot the messenger Quote Link to comment
+Dorsetgal & GeoDog Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Good work Ian, sometimes you have to speculate to accumulate! Personally, I think all caches on SSSIs should have permission anyway Quote Link to comment
+dibbler69 Posted November 5, 2008 Share Posted November 5, 2008 Personally, I think all caches on SSSIs should have permission anyway Dont all caches have permission any way. You have to tick the box when you submit Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.