+Jeff in Pa Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 The PN-20 is a very good unit and is very high on my list of choices, my only concern is the screen size which if someone here who now owns both could you please take a snapshot of both side by side. The map options on the PN-20 mean alot to me with the only concern being screen size and possibly the reception that it gets, i.e. heavy foilage. How does the PN-20 screen size compare to a Vista HCX? Thanks a million for any comments, Jeff Quote Link to comment
+embra Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 (edited) A picture's worth a thousand words, but I couldn't find one. The specs suggest they are virtually the same size: Vista HCx Display size, WxH: 1.3" x 1.7" (3.3 x 4.3 cm) Display resolution, WxH: 176 x 220 pixels Display type: "256 level color TFT" PN-20 Display size, WxH: 1.375" x 1.75" (3.5 x 4.4 cm) Display resolution, WxH: 176 x 220 pixels Display type: "Transflective TFT" Edited January 19, 2008 by embra Quote Link to comment
+Jeff in Pa Posted January 19, 2008 Author Share Posted January 19, 2008 Thanks Embra! Quote Link to comment
Baumer Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 1.53"W x 2.55"H (3.8 x 6.3 cm); 3" diag (7.6 cm) <-the colorado Quote Link to comment
+benjamin921 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 (edited) Don't have the Vista but here is an actual screen shot from my PN-20. (looks a tad bit bigger on here than in real life but still very good) Edited January 19, 2008 by benjamin921 Quote Link to comment
+embra Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 and possibly the reception that it gets, i.e. heavy foilage. I overlooked this...the PN-20 has fine reception. People who have put it up against the 60csx reported comparable performance. Some have observed that the accuracy fields favor other models. Delorme has said that they regard the other models as overly optimistic, and that they have used a more conservative algorithm to calculate their value. Quote Link to comment
+dwayne23 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 That screen shot looks great. I would still like to know is the screen smaller than the explorist. Quote Link to comment
+Team CowboyPapa Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 (edited) That screen shot looks great. I would still like to know is the screen smaller than the explorist. Check this: http://www.magellangps.com/products/product.asp?PRODID=1014 or, 2.25" diagonal, 4-level grayscale, high resolution (122 x 160), backlit Edited January 19, 2008 by CowboyPapa Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.