pitbulls20 Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 I was thinking of getting a GPS but as I looked at the different models there didn't seem to be a huge difference. The main thing I saw was the chipset in for example the 60csx which also cost like $150 more than the units in the eTrex series. Is this better chipset really worth the extra cash?? Planned use would be for geocaching, hiking, and hopefully soon long range backpacking and camping. Thanks Larry Quote Link to comment
SandyGarrity Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 As a Mountaineer, I don't Geocache, with a 60csx I'd say it was worth every penny, cent etc. Quote Link to comment
+apersson850 Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 The difference between the old traditional Garmin GPS receiver and the SiRFstar III is so large, that there is no meaning telling you. It has to be seen to be believed. Quote Link to comment
+geognerd Posted May 22, 2007 Share Posted May 22, 2007 You might want to hold off on your GPSr purchase if you can wait a few weeks. Check out this topic, which discusses upgrades to the eTrex series that may bring them up to par with the SiRF-equpped 60/76 models. Quote Link to comment
+alanfreed Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 To give you an idea of the difference the SIRF chip makes... I sat in the middle of our high school auditorium (no windows to be found... in the middle of the school), and I was getting a signal of +-20 feet. The difference is simply remarkable. I bought this unit because I was tired of losing a signal under tree cover. So far, the only time I've seen "Lost GPS Signal" has been in a tunnel. Quote Link to comment
The Lost Crew Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 We have both the 60CSx and the 76CSx. The mapping features are clear and easy to use. We love them. Garmin has several programs to interface with these units, and has an online feature called motionbased.com: "Using data collected from GPS devices, MotionBased empowers its customers with online data and mapping analysis, unattainable with the current set of products available to endurance athletes. While GPS technology has been available for many years to outdoor enthusiasts, few applications exist on the market where GPS data is effectively harnessed and analyzed for fitness and training." -from motionbased.com Quote Link to comment
pitbulls20 Posted May 23, 2007 Author Share Posted May 23, 2007 Awesome, thanks for the replies. I will wait now and just get one of the SiRFstar III chipset units. Quote Link to comment
+Chuy! Posted May 23, 2007 Share Posted May 23, 2007 For caching, I don't think it's worth it. I had the funds to purchase one, but having cached with friends that have 'em, I was not impressed and purchased a Venture Cx instead for almost half the price. I agree it gets better reception, but I did not find it improves my caching eperience to justify the $$. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.